Revisión de protocolos de contención de la tasa de cesárea: objetivos y desenlaces
| dc.contributor.advisor | Carrillo Moreno, Daniel Andres | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arias Montenegro, Fabian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arrieta Caycedo, Juan Pablo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ayala Velandia, Ana Gabriela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Castro Gomez, Gabriela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Galvis Garrido, Sofia Alejandra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mijares Avila, Lina Isabella | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Arrieta Caycedo, Juan Pablo[0000-0002-8353-1733] | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Ayala Velandia, Ana Gabriela [0000-0002-2279-2382] | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Galvis Garrido, Sofia Alejandra [0000-0002-5161-8762] | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Arias Montenegro, Fabian [0009-0003-6883-6357] | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-28T18:23:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-28T18:23:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-04-12 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Durante las últimas décadas, la tasa de cesárea ha incrementado considerablemente, generando un impacto significativo en el ámbito social, en salud y en economía internacional. Se considera que el aumento progresivo de esta se debe a factores socioeconómicos, demográficos y médico-quirúrgicos. Encontrando como ejemplo que para el año 2014 la tasa global de cesáreas fue de 39.6%, superando la tasa recomendada por la OMS de 10-15% (1),(2)(3). Algunos países se han concientizado de esta problemática y han optado por buscar estrategias para regular la tasa de cesárea. Entre estos, el caso de Brasil con el “Proyecto Parto Adecuado” (PPA) o el proyecto “Caesarean Reduction” (CARE) de Canadá (4). A lo largo de esta revisión de la literatura, se describirán algunas consideraciones actuales sobre el parto por cesárea y las estrategias que se han utilizado con su efectividad en los diferentes ámbitos descritos, así como los roles del personal de salud y el manejo monetario de los servicios en salud. | |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | During the last decades, the cesarean section rate has increased considerably, generating a significant impact on the social, health and international economy. It is estimated that the progressive increase is due to socioeconomic, demographic and medical-surgical factors, with a rate of 39.6% in 2014 (3), which is much higher than the WHO recommended rate of 10-15% ,(1)(2). Some countries around the world have become aware of this problem, and have chosen to seek strategies for the regulation of the cesarean rate, as in the case of Brazil with the "Appropriate Childbirth Project" (PPA) or with the "Cesarean Reduction" (CARE) project in Canada (4). Throughout this literature review, we will describe some current considerations on cesarean delivery and the strategies that have been used with their effectiveness in the different settings described, as well as the roles of health personnel and the monetary management of health services. | |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Pregrado | spa |
| dc.description.degreename | Médico Cirujano | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/12205 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Medicina | spa |
| dc.publisher.grantor | Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.publisher.program | Medicina | spa |
| dc.relation.references | 1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesárea. Human Reproduction Program . 2015;1–8. | |
| dc.relation.references | 2. OPS Organizacion Panamericana de la salud. La cesárea solo debería realizarse cuando es medicamente necesaria. Biblioteca digital OPS . 2015; | |
| dc.relation.references | 3. Jiménez Hernández DL, Guevara Rodríguez ADP, Zuleta Tobón JJ, Rubio Romero JA. Tasa de cesáreas por grupos de Robson en una institución de mediana complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá, 2012-2014. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2016 Jun 30;67(2):101. | |
| dc.relation.references | 4. Shoemaker ES, Bourgeault IL, Cameron C, Graham ID, Hutton EK. Results of implementation of a hospital-based strategy to reduce cesarean delivery among low-risk women in Canada. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2017 Nov;139(2):239–44. | |
| dc.relation.references | 5. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018 Oct;392(10155):1341–8. | |
| dc.relation.references | 6. Jaime A. Furzán. Nacimiento por cesárea y pronóstico neonatal. Arch Venez Puer Ped. 2014 Jun;77(2):78–86. | |
| dc.relation.references | 7. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019 Jan;133(1):e73–7. | |
| dc.relation.references | 8. Sadler M. Los efectos de la cesárea en la salud infantil: Un asunto urgente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2018;(ahead):0–0. | |
| dc.relation.references | 9. Gilloran JL. The relationship of the specialist in community health to environmental health services. Health Bull (Melb). 1972 Jan;30(1):67–8. | |
| dc.relation.references | 10. Vallejos Parás A, Espino y Sosa S, López Cervantes M, Durán Arenas L. ¿Las mujeres prefieren las cesáreas? Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2016 Jul;30(3):127–9. | |
| dc.relation.references | 11. Cantone D, Lombardi A, Assunto DA, Piccolo M, Rizzo N, Pelullo CP, et al. A standardized antenatal class reduces the rate of cesarean section in southern Italy. Medicine. 2018 Apr;97(16):e0456. | |
| dc.relation.references | 12. Negrini R, D’Albuquerque IMSC, de Cássia Sanchez e Oliveira R, Ferreira RD da S, De Stefani LFB, Podgaec S. Strategies to reduce the caesarean section rate in a private hospital and their impact. BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Aug 12;10(3):e001215. | |
| dc.relation.references | 13. Fecopen F. Racionalización del uso de la cesárea en Colombia. Consenso de la Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FECOLSOG) y la Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (FECOPEN). Bogotá, 2014. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2014 Jun 30;65(2):139. | |
| dc.relation.references | 14. Soto L C, Teuber L H, Cabrera F C, Marín N M, Cabrera D J, Da Costa S M, et al. EDUCACIÓN PRENATAL Y SU RELACIÓN CON EL TIPO DE PARTO: UNA VÍA HACIA EL PARTO NATURAL. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2006;71(2). | |
| dc.relation.references | 15. García OFD, Montoya JJB, Olvera HR. Operación cesárea. In: Manual de obstetricia y procedimientos medicoquirúrgicos. McGraw Hill. accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1126556951; 2016. | |
| dc.relation.references | 16. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Parto vaginal instrumental. In: Williams Obstetricia. 25e ed. McGraw Hill, https://accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=2739§ionid=229287264.; 2019. | |
| dc.relation.references | 17. Nagy S, Papp Z. Global approach of the cesarean section rates. J Perinat Med. 2021 Jan 26;49(1):1–4. | |
| dc.relation.references | 18. Rudey EL, Leal M do C, Rego G. Cesarean section rates in Brazil. Medicine. 2020 Apr;99(17):e19880. | |
| dc.relation.references | 19. Casallas Espitia DA, Florez Ruiz G, Gonzalez Valderrama J, Jerez Uribe JJ. Características sociodemograficas y clínicas asociadas a los casos de cesárea Colombia 2015. Universidad El Bosque http://hdl.handle.net/2050012495/2879. 2020 Apr 4; | |
| dc.relation.references | 20. CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. First Data Released on Maternal Mortality in Over a Decade. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2020/202001_MMR.htm. 2020. | |
| dc.relation.references | 21. Oviedo JD, Valencia R, De La Ossa M ferananda, Solano J, Clavijo AM, Acevedo L. DIRECCIÓN DE CENSOS Y DEMOGRAFÍA. Cifras definitivas 2017. . Gobierno de Colombia ; 2018 Dec. | |
| dc.relation.references | 22. Lagrew DC, Low LK, Brennan R, Corry MP, Edmonds JK, Gilpin BG, et al. National Partnership for Maternal Safety. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018 Mar;131(3):503–13. | |
| dc.relation.references | 23. Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, et al. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21099592/. 2010 Dec;116(6):1281–7. | |
| dc.relation.references | 24. Sandström A, Altman M, Cnattingius S, Johansson S, Ahlberg M, Stephansson O. Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27929527/. 2017 Mar;37(3):236–42. | |
| dc.relation.references | 25. Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Journal of Perinatal Medicine https://doi.org/101515/jpm-2020-0305. 2021 Jan 26;49(1):5–16. | |
| dc.relation.references | 26. Mariani GL, Vain NE. The rising incidence and impact of non-medically indicated pre-labour cesarean section in Latin America. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine https://dx.doi.org/101016/j.siny201809002. 2019 Feb;24(1):11–7. | |
| dc.relation.references | 27. Entringer AP, Pinto M, Dias MAB, Gomes MA de SM. Análise de custo-efetividade do parto vaginal espontâneo e da cesariana eletiva para gestantes de risco habitual no Sistema Único de Saúde. Cad Saude Publica. 2018 May 10;34(5). | |
| dc.relation.references | 28. Manual Tarifario SOAT de Salud. Republica de Colombia ; 2020. | |
| dc.relation.references | 29. Costa-Ramón AM, Rodríguez-González A, Serra-Burriel M, Campillo-Artero C. It’s about time: Cesarean sections and neonatal health. Journal of Health Economics https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629617307609. 2018 May;59:46–59. | |
| dc.relation.references | 30. The Lancet. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)32394-8/fulltext. 2018 Oct;392(10155):1279. | |
| dc.relation.references | 31. Topçu HO, Özel Ş, Üstün Y. Identifying strategies to reduce cesarean section rates by using Robson ten-group classification. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31588826/ . 2021 Aug 18;34(16):2616–22. | |
| dc.relation.references | 32. Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. The Lancet https://doi.org/101016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5. 2018 Oct;392(10155):1358–68. | |
| dc.relation.references | 33. Chaillet N, Dumont A, Abrahamowicz M, Pasquier JC, Audibert F, Monnier P, et al. A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates in Quebec. New England Journal of Medicine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25923551/. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1710–21. | |
| dc.relation.references | 34. Negrini R, Ferreira RD da S, Albino RS, Daltro CAT. Reducing caesarean rates in a public maternity hospital by implementing a plan of action: a quality improvement report. BMJ Open Quality https://doi.org/101136/bmjoq-2019-000791. 2020 May 6;9(2):e000791. | |
| dc.relation.references | 35. Oliveira C de F, Bortoli MC de, Setti C, Luquine Júnior CD, Toma TS. Apoio contínuo na assistência ao parto para redução das cirurgias cesarianas: síntese de evidências para políticas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva https://doi.org/101590/1413-8123202227241572020. 2022 Feb;27(2):427–39. | |
| dc.relation.references | 36. Eslambolchi L, Mosadeghrad AM, Taheri S, Afshari M. Taxonomy of effective strategies to reduce unnecessary caesareans: a systematic review. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2021 Aug 26;27(8):826–49. | |
| dc.relation.references | 37. Tang Y, Gao J, Sun L, Gao Y, Guo F, Chen Q. Promotion of Pre-natal Education Courses Is Associated With Reducing the Rates of Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study. Frontiers in Public Health https://doi.org/103389/fpubh2021666337. 2021 May 28;9. | |
| dc.relation.references | 38. Maleki M, Mousavizadeh A, Parhizkar S, Shams M. Using Social Marketing to Reduce Intention of Cesarean Section in Iranian Women. Journal of pregnancy . 2021;2021:3920126. | |
| dc.relation.references | 39. Boatin A, Cullinane F, Torloni M, Betrán A. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology https://doi.org/101111/1471-052814774. 2018 Jan;125(1):36–42. | |
| dc.relation.references | 40. Opiyo N, Young C, Requejo JH, Erdman J, Bales S, Betrán AP. Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions. Reproductive Health https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-020-00983-y | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.local | Acceso abierto | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Cesarea | |
| dc.subject | Mortalidad materna | |
| dc.subject | Efectividad de intervenciones | |
| dc.subject | Demanda inducida | |
| dc.subject | Determinantes sociales de la salud | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Cesarean section | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Maternal mortality | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Effectiveness of interventions | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Induced demand | |
| dc.subject.keywords | Social determinants of health | |
| dc.subject.nlm | W100 | |
| dc.title | Revisión de protocolos de contención de la tasa de cesárea: objetivos y desenlaces | |
| dc.title.translated | Review of containment protocols of the cesarean section rate: objectives and outcomes | |
| dc.type.coar | https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | |
| dc.type.coarversion | https://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | |
| dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
| dc.type.local | Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregrado | spa |