Hacia una mejor comprensión de la decoherencia desde una perspectiva general

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorFortín, Sebastián
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4531-7461
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:08:04Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:08:04Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01
dc.description.abstractEl trabajo se propone presentar un enfoque de la decoherencia cuántica más general que el enfoque tradicional de la decoherencia inducida por el entorno (environment-induced decoherence) formulado por Zurek y sus colaboradores. Este nuevo enfoque, que viene desarrollándose en diversas publicaciones de nuestro grupo, adopta la perspectiva del sistema cerrado completo, sistema más entorno, y se basa en el análisis de la evolución temporal de los valores medios de los observables de dicho sistema cerrado. Al unificar la decoherencia inducida por el entorno y algunas propuestas alternativos, este nuevo enfoque facilitaría la elucidación del concepto de decoherencia desde una perspectiva generalspa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe present paper proposes an approach to quantum decoherence more general than the traditional environment-induced decoherence (EID) approach, formulated by Zurek and his collaborators. This new approach, developed in different publications of our group, adopts the closed-system perspective, i.e. considers the whole system (system plus environment), and is based on the temporal evolution of the expecta-tion values of the closed system’s observables. By unifying the environment-induced decoherence and some alternative proposals, this new approach would facilitate the elucidation of the concept of decoherence from a general perspective.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1695
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6285
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 24, 2012, 65-82.spa
dc.relation.referencesAdler, S. “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P. W. Anderson”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 (2003): 135-142.—. Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesBacciagaluppi, G & Hemmo, M.. “Making sense of approximate decohe-rence”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1 (1994): 345-354.—. “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27 (1996): 239-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesBonifacio, R., Olivares, S., Tombesi, P. & Vitali, D. “Model-independent approach to nondissipative decoherence”. Physical Review A, 61 (2000): 053802.spa
dc.relation.referencesBub, J. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesCasati, G. & Chirikov, B. “Quantum chaos: unexpected complexity”. Physica D, 86 (1995): 220-237.spa
dc.relation.referencesCasati, G. & Prosen, T. “Quantum chaos and the double-slit experiment”. Physical Review A, 72 (2005): 032111.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastagnino, M. & Fortin, S. “Predicting decoherence in discrete models”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 50 (2011): 2259-2267.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastagnino, M., Fortin, S., Laura, R. & Lombardi, O. “A general theore-tical framework for decoherence in open and closed systems”. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25 (2008): 154002.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastagnino M. & Lombardi, O. “The self-induced approach to decoherence in cosmology”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42 (2003): 1281-1299.—. “Self-induced decoherence: a new approach”. Studies In History and Philo-sophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35 (2004): 73-107.—. “Self-induced decoherence and the classical limit of quantum mechanics”. Philosophy of Science, 72 (2005a): 764-776.—. “Decoherence time in self-induced decoherence”. Physical Review A, 72 (2005b): 764-776.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiosi, L. “A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics”. Physics Letters A, 120 (1987): 377-381.spa
dc.relation.referencesElby, A. “The «decoherence» approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philo-sophy of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1994.spa
dc.relation.referencesFord, G. W. & O’Connell, R. F. “Decoherence without dissipation”. Physics Letters A, 286 (2001): 87-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrasca, M. “General theorems on decoherence in the thermodynamic limit”. Physics Letters A, 308 (2003): 135-139.spa
dc.relation.referencesGambini, R. & Pulin, J. “Relational physics with real rods and clocks and the measurement problem of quantum mechanics”. Foundations of Physics, 37 (2007): 1074-1092.spa
dc.relation.referencesHealey, R. “Dissipating the quantum measurement problem”. To p o i, 14 (1995): 55-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeisenberg, W. “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer Kinematic und Mechanik”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43 (1927): 172-198. Versión inglesa: “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mecha-n i c s”. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Eds. J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.spa
dc.relation.referencesJoos, E. “Elements of environmental decoherence”. Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems.Eds. P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E.spa
dc.relation.referencesJoos, C. Kiefer & I.-O. Stamatescu. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2000. Lecture Notes in Physics 538.spa
dc.relation.referencesKiefer, C. & Polarski, D. “Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?”. Advanced Science Letters, 2 (2009): 164-173.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeggett, A. J. “Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox”. Quantum Implications. Eds. B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat. Londres: Routledge and Kegan P a u l , 19 8 7spa
dc.relation.referencesLombardi, O. & Vanni, L. “Medición cuántica y decoherencia: ¿qué medimos cuando medimos?”. Scientiae Studia,8 (2010): 273-291spa
dc.relation.referencesMilburn, G. J. “Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics”. Physical Review A, 44 (1991): 5401-5406.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. “Environment-induced decoherence and the transi-tion from quantum to classical”. Fundamentals of Quantum Information: Quantum Computation, Communication, Decoherence and All That. Ed. D. Heiss. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesPenrose, R. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesPessoa Jr., O. “Can the decoherence approach help to solve the measurement problem? ”, Synthese, 113 (1998): 323-346.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlosshauer, M. “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpre-tations of quantum mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76 (2004): 1267-1305.—. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesSicardi, A. C., Abal, G., Siri, R., Romanelli, A. & Donangelo, R. “Intrinsic decoherence and irreversibility in a quasiperiodic kicked rotor”, arXiv:quant-ph/0308162, 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Trad. R. T. Beyer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, [1932] 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesZeh, D. “On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory”, Founda-tions of Physics, 1 (1970): 69-76.spa
dc.relation.referencesZurek, W. H. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?”, Physical Review D, 24 (1981): 1516-1525.—. “Environment-induced superselection rules”, Physical Review D, 26 (1982): 1862-1880.—. “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”, Physics Today, 44 (1991): 36-44.—. “Preferred sets of states, predictability, classicality and environment-induced decoherence”. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry. Eds. J. J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader & W. H. Zurek, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.—. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75 (2003): 715-776.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1695
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectDecoherencia cuánticaspa
dc.subjectDecoherencia inducida por el entornospa
dc.subjectSistema cerradospa
dc.subject.keywordsQuantum Decoherencespa
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironment-induced Decoherenespa
dc.subject.keywordsClosed Systemspa
dc.titleHacia una mejor comprensión de la decoherencia desde una perspectiva generalspa
dc.title.translatedTowards a better understanding of decoherence from a general perspectivespa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2012.jpg
Tamaño:
84.27 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia