Bibliofaculty: Estrategia bidireccional para la articulación organizacional entre la biblioteca y las facultades

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCristancho Ferrer, Mónica Liliana
dc.contributor.authorCastro Rojas, Fabián Camilo
dc.contributor.authorAristizábal Otálvaro, Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Lasso, Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorReyes Meneses, Juan Francisco
dc.contributor.authorArturo Vargas, Germán
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T16:26:04Z
dc.date.available2024-06-21T16:26:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBibliofaculty es un servicio de la Biblioteca de la Universidad El Bosque pensado para potenciar el alcance y cobertura de su portafolio. También busca, desde un enfoque organizacional, fortalecer la comunicación con otras unidades de la Universidad y obtener información relevante para su transformación con un enfoque bidireccional. El presente documento busca exponer el servicio de Bibliofaculty y validar su apoyo en el fortalecimiento de los servicios de la biblioteca y la articulación de esta con otras unidades académicas de la universidad durante su funcionamiento. Bibliofaculty surgió mediante un piloto desde septiembre de 2022 y se implementó para todas las facultades en enero de 2023. Se ha realizado un levantamiento documental para indagar instituciones o investigaciones que aborden iniciativas similares en otras bibliotecas universitarias, hallando un marcado énfasis hacia la alfabetización informacional (Baker & Gladis, 2016; Charles, 2019; Gilman et al., 2017; Gregory & McCall, 2016; Junisbai et al., 2016; Matthies, 2004; Shane, 2004). Para el análisis de Bibliofaculty, se ha optado por un análisis metodológico basado en el modelo lógico para la conceptualización del servicio (Yim et al., 2020), junto a un enfoque de datos mixto, en el cual se analizan los datos de servicios y uso de la biblioteca en relación con períodos anteriores a su implementación, además de emplear información de encuestas a los decanos de las facultades para complementar el análisis con algunas consideraciones de las unidades académicas. Los resultados se evaluaron desde diferentes ejes estratégicos: articulación, usabilidad, consolidación, formación, percepción y costo/eficiencia.
dc.description.abstractenglishBibliofaculty is a service of the Universidad El Bosque Library designed to enhance the scope and coverage of its portfolio. It also seeks, from an organizational approach, to strengthen communication with other units of the University and to obtain relevant information for its transformation with a bidirectional approach. This document seeks to present the Bibliofaculty service and validate its support in strengthening library services and its articulation with other academic units of the university during its operation. Bibliofaculty was piloted in September 2022 and implemented for all faculties in January 2023. A document review was conducted to investigate institutions or research addressing similar initiatives in other university libraries, finding a strong emphasis on information literacy (Baker & Gladis, 2016; Charles, 2019; Gilman et al., 2017; Gregory & McCall, 2016; Junisbai et al., 2016; Matthies, 2004; Shane, 2004). For the analysis of Bibliofaculty, we opted for a methodological analysis based on the logic model for service conceptualization (Yim et al., 2020), together with a mixed data approach, in which we analyzed data on library services and usage in relation to periods prior to its implementation, we also used information from surveys of faculty deans to complement the analysis with some considerations of the academic units. The results were evaluated from different strategic axes: articulation, usability, consolidation, training, perception and cost/efficiency. The Bibliofaculty service has allowed the University Library to establish strategies to strengthen its relationship with users and other units, coordinate efforts and capabilities, and generate a perception of closeness that promotes the initiative to use the library to solve information needs. However, further analysis is needed to follow up on its long-term consolidation process, as well as to maintain an incremental approach according to the information obtained on specific needs by academic unit.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/12389
dc.language.isoes
dc.relation.referencesAlabi, A. O. (2018). Bridging the Great Divide: Librarian-faculty Collaboration in Selected Higher Institutions in Lagos State Nigeria. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.05.004
dc.relation.referencesAnglada i de Ferrer, L. M. (2006). Colaboraciones y alianzas: La inteligencia social aplicada a las bibliotecas universitarias. Anales de Documentación, 9, 7–15. https://revistas.um.es/analesdoc/article/view/1851
dc.relation.referencesBaker, L., & Gladis, P. (2016). Moving Ahead by Looking Back: Crafting a Framework for Sustainable, Institutional Information Literacy. En Information Literacy: Research and Collaboration across Disciplines (pp. 325–344). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0834.2.16
dc.relation.referencesCampillo Torres, I., & José Sitak, R. B. (2022). Direcciones estratégicas en torno al proceso de cooperación desde las bibliotecas de la Universidad Agostinho Neto. Bibliotecas. Anales de investigación, 18(1), 1–15.
dc.relation.referencesChaddha, K. (2009). Improving Faculty-Librarian Relationship in Academic Libraries. En Delhi University Library System (Ed.), ICAL 2009 – POSTER PAPERS (pp. 673–676). Conference proceedings of International Conference on Academic Libraries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283447388_Improving_Faculty-Librarian_Relationship_in_Academic_Libraries
dc.relation.referencesCharles, C. (2019). Faculty–Librarian Collaboration: Information Literacy Integration in Second Year English Writing and Composition in Second Year English Writing and Composition [Pd.D., Condordia University]. https://core.ac.uk/reader/287301198
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen, L., Stombler, M., & Thaxton, L. (2004). A Report on Librarian-Faculty Relations from a Sociological Perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.01.003
dc.relation.referencesFagan, J. C., Ostermiller, H., Price, E., & Sapp, L. (2021). Librarian, Faculty, and Student Perceptions of Academic Librarians: Study Introduction and Literature Review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 27(1), 38–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2019.1691026
dc.relation.referencesForbes, C. (2020). Portraits of Professional Collaboration:Faculty-Librarian Teaching Partnerships [Ph.D., University of Denver]. https://core.ac.uk/reader/388580036
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Amézquita, J., Arbeláez Parra, J., & Garrido Arenas, H. (2019). Gestores de relaciones interdisciplinarias: un rol activo en la implementación del CRAI de la Universidad del Rosario - Colombia. V Congreso Internacional de Bibliotecas Universitarias, 1–19.
dc.relation.referencesGilman, N., Sagàs, J., Camper, M., & Norton, A. (2017). A Faculty–Librarian Collaboration Success Story: Implementing a Teach-the-TeacherLibrary and Information Literacy Instruction Model in a First-Year AgriculturalScience Course. Library Trends, 65(3), 339–358. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/653636
dc.relation.referencesGregory, A. S., & McCall, B. L. (2016). Building Critical Researchers and Writers Incrementally: Vital Partnerships Between Faculty and Librarians. En Information Literacy: Research and Collaboration across Disciplines (pp. 371–386). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0834.2.18
dc.relation.referencesJunisbai, B., Lowe, S., & Tagge, N. (2016). A Pragmatic and Flexible Approach to Information Literacy: Findings from a Three-Year Study of Faculty-Librarian Collaboration. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.001
dc.relation.referencesKissel, F., Wininger, M. R., Weeden, S. R., Wittberg, P. A., Halverson, R. S., Lacy, M., & Huisman, R. K. (2016). Bridging the Gaps: Collaboration in a Faculty and Librarian Community of Practice on Information Literacy. En Information Literacy: Research and Collaboration across Disciplines (pp. 411–428). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0834.2.20
dc.relation.referencesMatthies, B. (2004). The road to faculty-librarian collaboration. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(4), 135–141. https://core.ac.uk/reader/62411328
dc.relation.referencesMuirragui-Irrazábal, V. L. (2019). Soporte a la docencia por bibliotecas adscritas a la red de bibliotecas Universitarias Españolas. Revista Electrónica en Educación y Pedagogía, 3(4), 107–121.
dc.relation.referencesShane, J. M. Y. (2004). Formal and Informal Structures for Collaboration on a Campus-Wide Information Literacy Program. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 17(1–2), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1300/J121v17n01_08
dc.relation.referencesSmith, J. D., Li, D. H., & Rafferty, M. R. (2020). The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implementation Science, 15(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8
dc.relation.referencesTennant, M. R., & Cataldo, T. T. (2002). Development and Assessment of Specialized Liaison Librarian Services. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 21(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J115v21n02_03
dc.relation.referencesVarela-Prado, C., & Baiget, T. (2012). El futuro de las bibliotecas académicas: incertidumbres, oportunidades y retos. Investigación bibliotecológica, 26(56), 115–135. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-358X2012000100006&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
dc.relation.referencesYamaguchi, M., & Richardson, J. (2018). Demonstrating academic library impact to faculty: A case study. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(2), 137–150. https://research- repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/371550/YamaguchiPUB4663.pdf?sequence=1
dc.relation.referencesYim, M., Fellows, M., & Coward, C. (2020). Mixed-methods library evaluation integrating the patron, library, and external perspectives: The case of Namibia regional libraries. Evaluation and program planning, 79, 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101782
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectComunicación interinstitucional
dc.subjectServicios especializados
dc.subjectEnfoque organizacional
dc.subjectOptimización de servicios
dc.subjectSoporte a la academia
dc.subjectBiblioteca universitaria
dc.subjectAprendizaje significativo
dc.subjectcomunicación bidireccional
dc.subject.keywordsInter-institutional communication
dc.subject.keywordsSpecialized services
dc.subject.keywordsOrganizational focus
dc.subject.keywordsService optimization
dc.subject.keywordsSupport to academia
dc.subject.keywordsUniversity library
dc.subject.keywordsMeaningful learning
dc.subject.keywordstwo-way communication
dc.titleBibliofaculty: Estrategia bidireccional para la articulación organizacional entre la biblioteca y las facultades
dc.title.translatedBibliofaculty: Bidirectional strategy for organizational articulation between the library and the faculties

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ponencia bibliofaculty.pdf
Tamaño:
503.84 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.95 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Biblioteca