“Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infants

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCormack, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Dena L.
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Roseann
dc.contributor.authorAlshaikh, Belal N.
dc.contributor.authorEliasziw, Misha
dc.contributor.authorFenton, Tanis
dc.contributor.authorHay, William W.
dc.contributor.authorHoyos, Angela
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Diane M.
dc.contributor.authorBloomfield, Frank
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Ian J.
dc.contributor.authorEmbleton, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorRochow, Niels
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Sarah N.
dc.contributor.authorSenterre, Thibault
dc.contributor.authorSchanler, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorElmrayed, Seham A.A.
dc.contributor.authorGroh-Wargo, Sharon L.
dc.contributor.authorAdamkin, David H.
dc.contributor.authorShah, Prakesh
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-26T20:54:06Z
dc.date.available2020-04-26T20:54:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractenglishPreterm infants are increasingly diagnosed as having“extrauterine growth restriction”(EUGR) or“postnatal growth failure”(PGF). Usually EUGR/PGF is diagnosed when weight is <10th percentile at either discharge or 36–40 weeks postmenstrualage. The reasons why the phrases EUGR/PGF are unhelpful include, they: (i) are not predictive of adverse outcome; (ii) arebased only on weight without any consideration of head or length growth, proportionality, body composition, or geneticpotential; (iii) ignore normal postnatal weight loss; (iv) are usually assessed prior to growth slowing of the reference fetus,around 36–40 weeks, and (v) are usually based on an arbitrary statistical growth percentile cut-off. Focus on EUGR/PGFprevalence may benefit with better attention to nutrition but may also harm with nutrition delivery above infants’actualneeds. In this paper, we highlight challenges associated with such arbitrary cut-offs and opportunities for further refinementof understanding growth and nutritional needs of preterm neonateseng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0658-5
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0743-8346
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2399
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Naturespa
dc.publisher.journalJournal of perinatologyspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of perinatology, 0743-8346, 2020, p. 704-714spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41372-020-0658-5
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf100
dc.rights.creativecommons2020
dc.rights.localAcceso cerradospa
dc.subject.decsPronósticospa
dc.subject.decsRecien nacido prematurospa
dc.subject.decsCrecimiento & desarrollospa
dc.title“Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infantsspa
dc.title.translated“Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infants
dc.typearticlespa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localartículospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Fenton, Tanis. et,al_2020.pdf
Tamaño:
774.83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos