Static computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorTattan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorChambrone, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Martín, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorAvila Ortiz, Gustavo
dc.contributor.orcidChambrone, Leandro [0000-0002-2838-1015]
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T21:07:07Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T21:07:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractenglishObjective To analyze the outcomes of static computer‐aided implant placement (sCAIP) compared to partially guided (PGIP) and free‐handed (FHIP) implant placement. Material and Methods This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019131397). A comprehensive literature search was performed by two independent examiners. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. Treatment modalities included sCAIP, PGIP, and FHIP. Data pertaining to the outcomes of interest were extracted. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were feasible for a subset of outcomes. Results From an initial list of 2,870 records, fourteen articles for a total of ten RCTs were selected. Data from 7 of these studies allowed for the conduction of three meta‐analyses comparing accuracy of implant placement across modalities. Survival rate up to 12 months post‐loading was high (>98%) and comparable between treatments (low‐quality evidence). No tangible differences in terms of patient perception of intra‐ or postoperative discomfort were observed (low‐quality evidence). Quantitative analyses revealed significantly lower angular (MD = 4.41° , 95% CI 3.99–4.83, p < .00001), coronal (MD = 0.65 mm, 95% CI 0.50–0.79, p < .00001), and apical (MD = 1.13 mm, 95% CI 0.92–1.34, p < .00001) deviation values for sCAIP as compared to FHIP (8 studies, 383 patients, 878 implants, high‐quality evidence). A similar discrepancy, in favor of sCAIP, was observed for angular deviation only as compared to PGIP (MD = 2.11° , 95% CI 1.06–3.16, p < .00001).eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13635
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/3670
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellspa
dc.publisher.journalClinical oral implants researchspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical oral implants research, 1600-0501, 2020spa
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/clr.13635
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightsAcceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons2020-07-12
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.subject.keywordsClinical assessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordsClinical researchspa
dc.subject.keywordsClinical trialsspa
dc.subject.keywordsDiagnosisspa
dc.subject.keywordsSurgical techniquesspa
dc.titleStatic computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsspa
dc.title.translatedStatic computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revista

Archivos

Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos