Comparación de la resistencia adhesiva de diferentes sistemas adhesivos con agentes antimicrobianos en su composición
dc.contributor.advisor | Rivera Barrero, Jaime Rodrigo | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Díaz-Báez, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Estupiñan Vasquez, Jennifer Lorena | |
dc.contributor.author | Sandra Melissa, Rodríguez | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T16:58:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T16:58:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | Los reportes de literatura sobre historia y evolución de adhesión destaca tanto estrategias de grabado como la selección de la técnica en el acondicionamiento de tejidos previo a la aplicación del adhesivo la cual estará directamente relacionada a las variantes estructurales que existen entre los tejidos y que provocan entonces un comportamiento distintos entre los dos sustratos, así mismo la implicabilidad que conlleva la inclusión de diferentes moléculas dentro de la composición de sistemas adhesivos los cuales buscan mejorar la resistencia adhesiva Objetivo: Comparar la fuerza de unión al cizallamiento y el modo de falla de los sistemas adhesivos con agentes antimicrobianos en su composición Materiales y métodos: Experimental, estudio in vitro. Se evaluaron 24 muestras de dientes bovinos sector anterior que fueron asesinados para consumo humano los cuales fueron distribuidos en 3 grupos relacionados a los sistemas adhesivos (Peak Ultradent, All Bond Universal y Gluma de KULZER con glutaraldehído), se realizaron preparaciones cavitarias con exposición de dentina con el aparato de corte micrométrico (ISOMET) hasta 2 mm, donde después de esta preparación se realizó protocolos adhesivos propuestos por cada casa comercial y se realizó un cilindro en resina sobre la superficie con Forma de la casa comercial Ultradent con posterior fotocurado lámpara VALO resultados: la resistencia adhesiva en el sistema adhesivo All bond Universal presentó un promedio de 16.07 ± 5.15 fue estadísticamente mayor en la resistencia adhesiva con respecto a la resistencia observada por Gluma promedio: 9.81 desviación estándar: 2.36, con relación a la comparación entre All Bond y Peak se observó una tendencia a que All Bond tiene una mayor resistencia pero no alcanzó a ser estadísticamente significativo. Conclusión: el estudio demostró que la generación de los adhesivos evaluados influye en la resistencia adhesiva, independientemente del agente antimicrobiano utilizado. | spa |
dc.description.abstractenglish | Literature reports on the history and evolution of adhesion highlight etchings trategies and the conditioning technique for tissues before the application of adhesives which is directly related to structural variables of tissues and their behaviour. In addition, it implies the inclusion of different molecules in the systems’ composition aimed at improving the adhesive resistance. Objective: to compare the adhesive strength to shearing and type of failure of adhesive systems with anti-microbial agents in their composition. Methods: Experimental, in vitro study in which 24 anterior sector teeth samples of sacrificed bovines for human consumption were evaluated. They were distributed in three groups related to the adhesive systems (Peak Ultradent, all bond universal and Gluma by kulzer with glutaraldehyde), cavity preparations were performed exposing dentin with the micrometric cutter (ISOMET) up to two mm, the adhesive protocols of each company were carried out, a resin cylinder was produced on the surface following Ultradent’s guideline and photocuring with a valo lamp. Results: The adhesive resistance of All Bond Universal has an average of 16.07 ± 5.15, was statistically higher with regards to Gluma average: 9.81 standard deviation: 2.36, comparison between All Bond and Peak showed a tendency of the former towards higher resistance but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: the study revealed that the generation of evaluated adhesives influences the resistance independently of the anti-microbial agent used. | eng |
dc.description.degreelevel | Especialización | spa |
dc.description.degreename | Especialista en Operatoria Dental Estética y Materiales Dentales | spa |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundación Universitaria UniCIEO | spa |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad El Bosque | spa |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque | spa |
dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/8095 | |
dc.language.iso | spa | |
dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Odontología | spa |
dc.publisher.grantor | Universidad El Bosque | spa |
dc.publisher.program | Especialización en Operatoria Dental Estética y Materiales Dentales | spa |
dc.relation.references | 1. Bertassoni LE, Orgel JP, Antipova O, Swain MV. The dentin organic matrix - limitations of restorative dentistry hidden on the nanometer scale. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2419-2433 2. Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7-26. 3. Dos Santos PH, Karol S, Bedran-Russo AK. Long-term nano-mechanical properties of biomodified dentin-resin interface components. J Biomech. 2011;44(9):1691-1694. 4. Eick JD, Wilko RA, Anderson CH, Sorensen SE. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res. 1970;49(6):1359-1368 5. Ganesh AS. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth generation bonding agents: An In Vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(5):752-757. 6. Giacomini MC, Scaffa PMC, Gonçalves RS, et al. Profile of a 10-MDP-based universal adhesive system associated with chlorhexidine: Dentin bond strength and in situ zymography performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103925. 7. Gu L, Mazzoni A, Gou Y, et al. Zymography of Hybrid Layers Created Using Extrafibrillar Demineralization. J Dent Res. 2018;97(4):409-415. 8. Kazemi-Yazdi H, Saeed-Nezhad M, Rezaei S. Effect of Chlorhexidine on durability of two self-etch adhesive systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(7):e663-e669 9. Li B, Zhu X, Ma L, et al. Selective demineralisation of dentine extrafibrillar minerals-A potential method to eliminate water-wet bonding in the etch-and-rinse technique. J Dent. 2016;52:55-62 10. Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, et al. Dentin-smear remains at self-etch adhesive interface. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1147-1153. 11. Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Platt JA. Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Oral Sci. 2014;56(1):1-9. 12. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1-16. 13. Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):333-viii. 14. Ramos G, Calvo N, Fierro R. Adhesión convencional en dentina, dificultades y avances en la técnica. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 2015; 26(2): 468-486. 15. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent. 2007;35(6):467-475 16. Stape THS, Wik P, Mutluay MM, Al-Ani AAS, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Selective dentin etching: A potential method to improve bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;86:14-22. 17. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17(4):296-308. 18. Tessore, R., Silveira, C., Vázquez, P., Mederos, M., García, A., Cuevas-Suarez, C. E., & Grazioli, G. Evaluación de la resistencia de unión a dentina humana de un sistema adhesivo universal con clorhexidina utilizado en modo de grabado total y autocondicionante. Odontoestomatología, 2020;22(35), 20-29. 19. Toroian D, Lim JE, Price PA. The size exclusion characteristics of type I collagen: implications for the role of noncollagenous bone constituents in mineralization. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(31):22437-22447. 20. Valencia, José de Jesús Cedillo, et al. Adaptación marginal e hibridación de los adhesivos de autograbado. Estudio in vivo. Revista de la Asociación Dental Mexicana, 2012;69, (2):76-82. 21. Van Landuyt KL, Krifka S, Hiller KA, et al. Evaluation of cell responses toward adhesives with different photoinitiating systems. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):916-927 22. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757-3785. 23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235. 20. Valencia, José de Jesús Cedillo, et al. Adaptación marginal e hibridación de los adhesivos de autograbado. Estudio in vivo. Revista de la Asociación Dental Mexicana, 2012;69, (2):76-82. 21. Van Landuyt KL, Krifka S, Hiller KA, et al. Evaluation of cell responses toward adhesives with different photoinitiating systems. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):916-927 22. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757-3785. 23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235. | spa |
dc.relation.references | 1. Bertassoni LE, Orgel JP, Antipova O, Swain MV. The dentin organic matrix - limitations of restorative dentistry hidden on the nanometer scale. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2419-2433 2. Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7-26. 3. Dos Santos PH, Karol S, Bedran-Russo AK. Long-term nano-mechanical properties of biomodified dentin-resin interface components. J Biomech. 2011;44(9):1691-1694. 4. Eick JD, Wilko RA, Anderson CH, Sorensen SE. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res. 1970;49(6):1359-1368 5. Ganesh AS. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth generation bonding agents: An In Vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(5):752-757. 6. Giacomini MC, Scaffa PMC, Gonçalves RS, et al. Profile of a 10-MDP-based universal adhesive system associated with chlorhexidine: Dentin bond strength and in situ zymography performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103925. 7. Gu L, Mazzoni A, Gou Y, et al. Zymography of Hybrid Layers Created Using Extrafibrillar Demineralization. J Dent Res. 2018;97(4):409-415. 8. Kazemi-Yazdi H, Saeed-Nezhad M, Rezaei S. Effect of Chlorhexidine on durability of two self-etch adhesive systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(7):e663-e669 9. Li B, Zhu X, Ma L, et al. Selective demineralisation of dentine extrafibrillar minerals-A potential method to eliminate water-wet bonding in the etch-and-rinse technique. J Dent. 2016;52:55-62 10. Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, et al. Dentin-smear remains at self-etch adhesive interface. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1147-1153. 11. Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Platt JA. Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Oral Sci. 2014;56(1):1-9. 12. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1-16. 13. Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):333-viii. 14. Ramos G, Calvo N, Fierro R. Adhesión convencional en dentina, dificultades y avances en la técnica. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 2015; 26(2): 468-486. 15. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent. 2007;35(6):467-475 16. Stape THS, Wik P, Mutluay MM, Al-Ani AAS, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Selective dentin etching: A potential method to improve bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;86:14-22. 17. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17(4):296-308. 18. Tessore, R., Silveira, C., Vázquez, P., Mederos, M., García, A., Cuevas-Suarez, C. E., & Grazioli, G. Evaluación de la resistencia de unión a dentina humana de un sistema adhesivo universal con clorhexidina utilizado en modo de grabado total y autocondicionante. Odontoestomatología, 2020;22(35), 20-29. 19. Toroian D, Lim JE, Price PA. The size exclusion characteristics of type I collagen: implications for the role of noncollagenous bone constituents in mineralization. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(31):22437-22447. 20. Valencia, José de Jesús Cedillo, et al. Adaptación marginal e hibridación de los adhesivos de autograbado. Estudio in vivo. Revista de la Asociación Dental Mexicana, 2012;69, (2):76-82. 21. Van Landuyt KL, Krifka S, Hiller KA, et al. Evaluation of cell responses toward adhesives with different photoinitiating systems. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):916-927 22. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757-3785. 23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235. 20. Valencia, José de Jesús Cedillo, et al. Adaptación marginal e hibridación de los adhesivos de autograbado. Estudio in vivo. Revista de la Asociación Dental Mexicana, 2012;69, (2):76-82. 21. Van Landuyt KL, Krifka S, Hiller KA, et al. Evaluation of cell responses toward adhesives with different photoinitiating systems. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):916-927 22. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757-3785. 23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235. | spa |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights.accessrights | https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.rights.local | Acceso abierto | spa |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Clorhexidina | spa |
dc.subject | Resistencia adhesiva | spa |
dc.subject | Metaloproteasas | spa |
dc.subject | Dentina | spa |
dc.subject | Agentes de Unión | spa |
dc.subject.keywords | Chlorhexidine | spa |
dc.subject.keywords | Adhesive strength | spa |
dc.subject.keywords | Metalloproteases | spa |
dc.subject.keywords | Bonding agents | spa |
dc.subject.nlm | WU300 | |
dc.title | Comparación de la resistencia adhesiva de diferentes sistemas adhesivos con agentes antimicrobianos en su composición | spa |
dc.title.translated | Comparison of adhesive strength of different adhesive systems with anti-microbial agents in their composition | spa |
dc.type.coar | https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | |
dc.type.coarversion | https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | |
dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
dc.type.local | Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregrado | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Rodriguez_Ardila_Sandra_Melissa_2022.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 506.4 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Comparación de la resistencia adhesiva de diferentes sistemas adhesivos con agentes antimicrobianos en su composición
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- Acta de aprobación.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 284.39 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Acta de aprobación
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- ANEXOS- AUTORIZACIONES DIVULGACION BIBLIOTECA Rodriguez_Ardila_Sandra_Melissa_2022.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 319.98 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Carta de autorización
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 1.95 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción: