Desafiando la validez de constructo de soborno en la economía experimental

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorSenci, Carlos Maximiliano
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9131-3843
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:22:22Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:22:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractEl constructo de soborno que emplean los estudios experimentales sobre corrupción enfrenta tres desafíos interrelacionados. En primer lugar, la noción de confianza em-pleada en el constructo de soborno reduce la misma a un mero cálculo de riesgo. En se-gundo lugar, y como consecuencia de lo anterior, el contexto apropiado de interacción se encuentra indeterminado. Por último, los experimentos presentan una insuficiente explicitación del marco normativo. En resumen, los investigadores sobre corrupción deben ser conscientes de los desafíos del constructo que emplean en el laboratorio y deben abordar los problemas antes mencionados para no comprometer la validez de sus resultados.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe bribery construct employed by experimental studies of corruption faces three inter-related challenges. First, the notion of trust used in the bribery construct reduces it to a mere calculation of risk. Second, and as a consequence of the above, the appropriate context of interaction is undetermined. Finally, the experiments show an insufficient clarification of the normative framework. In short, researchers on corruption should be mindful of the challenges of the construct they employ in the lab, and they should tackle the aforementioned issues in order not to compromise the validity of their results.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3252
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6305
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 21 Núm 42, 2021, 205-234.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbbink, Klaus. “Staff Rotation as an Anti-corruption Policy: an Experimental Study”. Journal of European Political Economy 20.4 (2004): 887-906. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008>spa
dc.relation.referencesAbbink, Klaus., and Hennig-Schmidt, Heike. “Neutral Versus Loaded Instructions in a Bribery Experiment”. Experimental Economics 9.2 (2006): 103-121. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-5385-z>spa
dc.relation.referencesAbbink, Klaus., and Serra, Danila. “Anticorruption Policies: Lessons from the Lab”. New Advances in Experimental Research on Corruption (Research in Exper-imental Economics, Vol. 15. Eds. Serra, Danila. and Wantchekon, Leonard. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012. 77-115. <https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-2306(2012)0000015006>spa
dc.relation.referencesAlatas, Vivi., Cameron, Lisa., Erkal, Nisvan., and Gangadharan, Lata. “Subject Pool Effects in a Corruption Experiment: A comparison of Indonesian Public Ser-vants and Indonesian Students”. Experimental Economics 12.1 (2009): 113-132. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9207-3>spa
dc.relation.referencesAlekseev, Aleksandr., Gary Charness., and Uri Gneezy. “Experimental Methods: When and Why Contextual Instructions Are Important”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 134.1 (2017): 48-59. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.005>spa
dc.relation.referencesAlexandrova, Ana., and Daniel M, Heibron. “Is Construct Validation Valid?” Philos-ophy of Science 83.5 (2016): 1098-1109. <https://doi.org/10.1086/687941>spa
dc.relation.referencesAndvig, Jens Chr. “Corruption and Fast Change”. World Development 34.2 (2006): 328-340. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.007>spa
dc.relation.referencesArmantier, Oliver., and Amadou, Boly. “A Controlled Field Experiment on Cor-ruption”. European Economic Review, 55.8 (2011): 1072–1082. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.04.007>spa
dc.relation.referencesBanerjee, Ritwik. “On the Interpretation of Bribery in a Laboratory Corruption Game: Moral Frames and Social Norms”. Experimental Economics 19.1 (2016): 240–267. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9436-1>spa
dc.relation.referencesBanfield, Edward C. “The Moral Basis of a Backward Society”. Glencoe: IL: The Free Press, 1958.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarr, Abigail., and Danila, Serra. “The Effects of Externalities and Framing on Brib-ery in a Petty Corruption Experiment”. Experimental Economics 12.4 (2009): 488-503. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-009-9225-9>spa
dc.relation.referencesBarron, Kenneth., Allison R. Brown., Christopher R. Gesualdi., Kimberly A. Marchuk., and Theresa E. Egan. “Validity”. 21st Century Psychology: A Reference Handbook. Eds. Davis, Stephen F., and Buskist, William. Thousand Oaks, Cal-ifornia: Sage, 2008. 55–64. <https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412956321.n7>spa
dc.relation.referencesBerg, Joyce., Dickhaut, John., and McCabe, Kevin. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History”. Games and Economic Behavior 10.1 (1995): 122-142. <https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027>spa
dc.relation.referencesBicchieri, Cristina. “The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorsboom, Denny. “Measuring the Mind”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. <https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511490026>spa
dc.relation.referencesBorsboom, Denny., Cramer, Angélique., Kievit, Rogier A., Franić, Sanja., and Scholten, Annemarie Zand. “The End of Construct Validity”. The Concept of Validity: Revisions, New Directions, and Applications. Ed. Lissitz, Robert W. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2009. 135-170.spa
dc.relation.referencesBray, John. “The Use of Intermediaries and Other ‘Alternatives’ to Bribery”. The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. Eds. Johann Graf Lambsdorff, Markus Taube and Matthias Schramm. London: Routledge, 2004. 112-137.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrennan, Geoffrey., Lina Eriksson, Brennan., Robert E. Goodin, and Nicholas Southwood. “Explaining Norms”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesBobkova, Nina., y Egbert, Henrik. “Corruption investigated in the lab: A Survey of the Experimental Literature”. International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences 2.4 (2012): 337-349. <https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:38163>spa
dc.relation.referencesCamaño-Alegre, María. and Camaño-Alegre, José. “From Ontological Traits to Va-lidity Challenges in Social Science: The Cases of Economic Experiments and Research Questionnaires”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32.2 (2019): 101-127. <https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2019.1682773>spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, Donald T. “Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in So-cial Settings”. Psychological Bulletin 54.4 (1957): 297–312. <https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950>spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell Donald T., and Cook Thomas D. “Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings”. Dallas, Ill.: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.spa
dc.relation.referencesCapraro, Valerio. and Rand, David G. “Do the Right Thing: Experimental Evidence that Preferences for Moral Behavior, Rather than Equity and Efficiency Per Se, Drive Human Prosociality”. Judgment and Decision Making 13.1 (2018): 99-111.spa
dc.relation.referencesCialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., and Kallgren C.A. “A Focus Theory of Normative con-duct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58.6 (1990): 1015–1026. <https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015>spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, James William. “Toward an Integrated Theory of White-Collar Crime”. American Journal of Sociology 93.2 (1987): 406-439. <https://doi.org/10.1086/228750>spa
dc.relation.referencesCronbach, Lee J., and Meehl, Paul E. “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests”. Psychological Bulletin 52.4 (1955): 281-302. <https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957>spa
dc.relation.referencesDella Porta, Donnatella., and Vannuci, Alberto. “Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Re-sources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption”. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1999. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080284>spa
dc.relation.referencesEngel, Christoph., and Rand, David G. “What does ‘Clean’ Really Mean? the Im-plicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments”. Economic Letters 122.3 (2014): 386-389. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.020>spa
dc.relation.referencesFalk, Armin., and Czech, Nora. “Morals and Markets”. Science 340.6133 (2013): 707-711. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231566>spa
dc.relation.referencesFehr, Ernst., and Schmidt, Klaus M. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Coop-eration”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114.3 (1999): 817–868. <https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151>spa
dc.relation.referencesFrank, Björn. and Schulze, Günther G. “Does Economics make Citizens Corrupt?”.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43.1 (2000): 101-113. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00111-6>spa
dc.relation.referencesGneezy, Uri., and Rustichini, Aldo. “A Fine Is a Price”. The Journal of Legal Studies 29.1 (2000): 1-17. <https://doi.org/10.1086/468061>spa
dc.relation.referencesGuala, Francesco. “The Methodology of Experimental Economics”. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. <https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614651>spa
dc.relation.referencesHansson, Sven O. “Risk”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, 2018. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/risk/>spa
dc.relation.referencesHeimer, Carol A. “Solving the Problem of Trust”. Trust in Society. Ed. Karen S. Cook. Russell Sage Foundation, 2001. 40-88spa
dc.relation.referencesHeukelom, F. “How Validity Travelled to Economic Experimenting”. Journal of Economic Methodology 18.1 (2011): 13-28. <https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2011.556435>spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffrage, Ulrich. “Overconfidence”. Cognitive Illusions: a Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Ed. Pohl, Rüdiger. Dove and New York: Psychology Press, 2004. 235-254.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacquemet, Nicholas. “Corruption as betrayal: Experimental Evidence on Corrup-tion Under Delegatio”. gate Groupe d’Analyse et de Théorie Économique (2012) <https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00180044>spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, Daniel., and Tversky, Amos. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk”. Econometrica 47.1 (1979): 263-291. <https://doi.org/10.21236/ada045771>spa
dc.relation.referencesKlitgaard, Robert E. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesLambsdorff, J. G. and Teksoz, S. U. “Corrupt relational contracting”. The New In-stitutional Economics of Corruption. Eds. Johann Graf Lambsdorff, Markus Taube, Matthias Schramm. London: Routledge, 2004. 138-151. <https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511492617.010>spa
dc.relation.referencesLambsdorff, Johann G. and Frank, Björn. “Bribing versus Gift-Giving: An Exper-iment”. Journal of Economic Psychology 31.3 (2010): 347–357. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.004>spa
dc.relation.referencesMcAdams, Richard H. “The Expressive Powers of Law: Theories and Limits”. Bos-ton, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesManski, Charles. “Identification of Decision Rules in Experiments on Simple Games of Proposal and Response”. European Economic Review 46.1 (2002): 880-891.spa
dc.relation.referencesMessick, Samuel. “Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons’ Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning”. New Jersey: Educational Testing ServicePrinceton, Research Report Series 1994. i-28. <https://Doi.org/10.1002/j.23338504.1994.tb01618.x>spa
dc.relation.referencesNickel, Philip J. “Trust, Staking, and Expectations”. Journal for the Theo-ry of Social Behaviour 39.2 (2009): 345-362. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00407.x>spa
dc.relation.referencesNickel, Philip J. and Vaesen, Krist. “Trust and Risk”. Handbook of Risk Theo-ry: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk. Eds.Roeser, Sabine., Hillerbrand, Rafaela., Sandin, Per. and Peterson, Martín. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 857-876. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_34>spa
dc.relation.referencesNye, J. S. “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis”. The American Political Science Review 61.2 (1967): 417-27. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1953254>spa
dc.relation.referencesPinker, Steven., Nowak, Martín A., and Lee, James. “The Logic of Indirect Speech”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105.3 (2008): 833-838. <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707192105>spa
dc.relation.referencesPrentice, R. A. “Moral Norms, Behavioral Ethics and Bribery Activity”. Thinking about Bribery: Neuroscience, Moral Cognition and the Psychology of Bribery. Eds. Nichols, Philip., and Diana, Robertson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316450765>spa
dc.relation.referencesReiss, J. “Against External Validity”. Synthese 196.8 (2019): 3103-3121. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1796-6>spa
dc.relation.referencesRothstein, Bo., and Uslaner, Eric. “All for All. Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust”. World Politics 58.1 (2005): 41-72. <https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0022>spa
dc.relation.referencesSchulze, Günther G., and Frank, Björn. “Deterrence versus Intrinsic Motivation: Experimental evidence on the Determinants of Corruptibility”. Econ Gov 4.1 (2003): 143–160. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010200059>spa
dc.relation.referencesSenci, Carlos Maximiliano; Hasrun, Hipolito Manuel; Moro, Rodrigo; Freidin, Es-teban. “The Influence of Prescriptive Norms and Negative Externalities on Bribery Decisions in the Lab”. Rationality and Society 31.3 (2019): 287-312. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463119853893>spa
dc.relation.referencesShadish, William R., Thomas D. Cook., and Donald T., Campbell. “Experimental and Quasi experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference”. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, Vernon. “Papers in Experimental Economics”. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1991. <https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511528354>spa
dc.relation.referencesSjöberg, Lennart. “The Methodology of Risk Perception Research”. Quality & Quantity 34 (2000): 407-418. <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004838806793>spa
dc.relation.referencesSuppe, Frederick. “The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theo-ries”. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Ed. Frederick Suppe. Urbana: Uni-versity of Illinois Press, 1974. 1-241.spa
dc.relation.referencesThaler, Richard H. “Mental Accounting Matters”. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12.3 (1999): 183-206.spa
dc.relation.referencesUslaner, Eric M. “Trust and Corruption”. Corruption and the New Institutional Eco-nomics. Eds. J. G. Lambsdorf, M. Taube, and M. Schramm. London: Rout-ledge, 2004. 76-92. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413920>spa
dc.relation.referencesXiao, Erte. “Punishment, Social Norms and Cooperation”. Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics. Eds. Joshua C. Teitelbaum and Kathryn Zeiler. Elgar Publishing, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805681.00014>spa
dc.relation.referencesWarren, M. “Political Corruption as Duplicitous Exclusion”. Political Science & Pol-itics 39.4 (2006): 803-807. <https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060975>spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliamson, Oliver E. “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization”. The Journal of Law & Economics 36.1 (1993): 453-486. <https://doi.org/10.1086/467284>spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3252
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectSobornospa
dc.subjectValidez de constructospa
dc.subjectExperimentos de laboratoriospa
dc.subjectConfianzaspa
dc.subjectNormasspa
dc.subject.keywordsBriberyspa
dc.subject.keywordsConstruct validityspa
dc.subject.keywordsLab experimentsspa
dc.subject.keywordsTrustspa
dc.subject.keywordsNormsspa
dc.titleDesafiando la validez de constructo de soborno en la economía experimentalspa
dc.title.translatedChallenging the Construct Validity of Bribery in Experimental Economicsspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2021.jpg
Tamaño:
50.65 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia