El problema de las clases naturales en química: consideraciones acerca del esencialismo kripkeano desde la filosofía de la química

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorLópez, Cristian
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T14:16:25Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T14:16:25Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo del presente trabajo consiste en analizar y cuestionar algunas tesis esencialistas sobre el problema de las clases naturales, en particular las tesis semánticas y metafísicas de Saul Kripke, según las cuales existen clases naturales que poseen propiedades esenciales científicamente descubiertas. Los argumentos se basan en la práctica científica química y los desarrollos en filosofía de la química. Como aporte positivo al problema de las clases naturales en química, el trabajo busca defender la viabilidad de una posición alternativa al esencialismo sin caer en el convencionalismo: un pluralismo ontológico con raíces kantianas.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe aim of this paper is to analyze some essentialist theses about the problem of natural kinds, particularly, Kripke’s semantic and metaphysical theses, which claim that there are natural kinds with essences scientifically discovered. The arguments presented in this paper begin by considering the scientific practice of chemistry and the developments of philosophy of chemistry. As a positive thesis contribution to the problem of natural kinds in chemistry, this paper aims to defend the viability of an alternative approach to essentialism without having to embrace any conventionalism: a Kantian-rooted ontolo-gical pluralism.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1646
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6244
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 13 Núm 26, 2013, 145-166.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrigandt, I. & Love, A. “Reductionism in biology”. Ed. E. N. Zalta. The Stan-ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2012. En línea. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/ reduction-biology/>.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastagnino, M., Gadella, M. & Lombardi, O. “Time ́s arrow and irreversibi-lity in time-asymmetric quantum mechanics”. InternationalStudies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2005): 223-242.—. “Time-reversal, irreversibility and arrow of time in quantum mechanics”. Foundations of Physics 36 (2006): 407-426.spa
dc.relation.referencesDupré, J. “Natural kinds”. Ed. W. H. Newton-Smith. A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993. 311-319.spa
dc.relation.referencesKant, I. Kritik der Reinen Vernunft [KRV]. 1781. Trad. N. Kemp Smith. Critique of Pure Reason. Nueva York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.spa
dc.relation.referencesKripke, S. “Naming and necessity”. Eds. G. Harman & D. Davidson. Seman-tics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972. 253-355.—. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.spa
dc.relation.referencesHendry, R. “Elements, compounds and other chemical kinds”. Philosophy of Science 73 (2006): 864-875.spa
dc.relation.referencesLabarca, M. & Lombardi, O. “Why orbitals do not exist?” Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 149-157.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaudan, L. “A confutation of convergent realism”. Philosophy of Science 48 (1981): 19 - 49.spa
dc.relation.referencesLewowicz, L. & Lombardi, O. “Stuff versus individuals”. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2013): 65-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesLombardi, O. “Determinism, internalism and objectivity”. Eds. H. Atmanspa-cher & R. Bishop. Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Thorverton: Imprint-Academic, 2002a. 75-87.—. “Caos, ergodicidad e internalismo”. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía28 (2002b): 7-33.spa
dc.relation.referencesLombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical w or ld ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148.—. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: a response to Needham”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesLombardi, O. & Pérez Ransanz. “Lenguaje, ontología y relaciones inter-teóricas: en favor de un genuino pluralismo ontológico”. Revista Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 187 (2011): 43-52.—. Los múltiples mundos de la ciencia. Un realismo pluralista y su aplicación a la filosofía de la física. México: UNAM-Siglo XXI, 2012spa
dc.relation.referencesNeedham, P. “What is water?” Analysis 60 (2000): 13-21.—. “Microessentialism: What is the argument?”. Noûs 45 (2011): 1-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesPutnam, H. “The meaning of meaning”. Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. 215-271.spa
dc.relation.referencesRohrlich, F. “Pluralistic ontology and theory reduction in the physical sciences”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1988): 295-312.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuthenberg, K. “What is water? Some philosophical considerations”. Eds. H. P. Hahn, K. Cless & J. People at the Well: Kinds, Usages and Meanings of Water in a Global Perspective. Soentgen. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2012. 65-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorretti, R. “Objectivity: a Kantian perspective”. Ed. M. Massimi. Kant and Philo-sophy of Science Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 81-95.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Brakel, J. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000.—. “On the inventors of XYZ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 57-84.—. “Pure chemical substances”. Eds. K. Ruthenberg & J. Van Brakel. Stuff. The Nature of Chemical Substances. Würzburg: Königshauen & Neumann, 2008. 145-162spa
dc.relation.referencesWeisberg, M. “Water is not H2O”. Eds. D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre. Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline. New York: Springer, 2005. 337-345spa
dc.relation.referencesWoolgar, S. Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock, 1988.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1646
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectClases naturalesspa
dc.subjectFilosofía de la químicaspa
dc.subjectEsencialismospa
dc.subjectPluralismo ontológicospa
dc.subjectAguaspa
dc.subject.keywordsNatural kindsspa
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophy of chemistryspa
dc.subject.keywordsEssentialismspa
dc.subject.keywordsOntological pluralismspa
dc.subject.keywordsWaterspa
dc.titleEl problema de las clases naturales en química: consideraciones acerca del esencialismo kripkeano desde la filosofía de la químicaspa
dc.title.translatedThe problema of natural kinds in Chemistry: Considerations about kripkean essentia-Lism from the philosophy of Chemistryspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2013.jpg
Tamaño:
124.16 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia