Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorArmijo Torres, Álvaro
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4964-3723
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:29:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:29:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractLa filosofía de las ciencias sociales tradicionalmente ha ocupado un rol secundario den-tro de la filosofía de las ciencias. Sin embargo, esta situación ha cambiado en las últimas décadas. Dado lo anterior, en este artículo muestro el desarrollo de una filosofía de las ciencias sociales motivada tanto por la filosofía de las ciencias como por las ciencias sociales. En lo práctico, tres son las ideas desarrolladas: 1) existe una conexión entre filo-sofía de las ciencias sociales y filosofía de las ciencias; 2) dicha conexión se explica a partir de las transformaciones recientes en filosofía de las ciencias, y 3) esta conexión ofrece nuevos enfoques para comprender la realidad social y la práctica de las ciencias sociales.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishPhilosophy of the social sciences has traditionally occupied a secondary role within the philosophy of science. However, this situation has changed in recent decades. Given the above, in this article I show the development of a philosophy of social sciences motivated by both the philosophy of science and the social sciences. Three are the main ideas developed in this paper: 1) there is a connection between the philosophy of the social sciences and the philosophy of science; 2) this connection is explained from the recent transformations in the philosophy of science and 3) this connection offers new approaches to understanding the social reality and the practice of the social sciences.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3478
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6310
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 21 Núm 42, 2021, 37-72.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaert, Patrick. Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Po-lity Press, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenton, Ted e Ian Craib. Philosophy of Social Science The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. 2nd ed. New York, NJ: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerger, Peter L. y Thomas Luckmann. La construcción social de la realidad. Trad. Silvia Zuleta. 18th ed. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesBhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contempo-rary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd, Richard. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 61.1/2 (1991): 127-148. <www.jstor.org/stable/4320174>spa
dc.relation.referencesBrand, Jennie E. y Juli Simon Thomas. “Causal Effect Heterogeneity”. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Ed. Stephen L. Morgan. Dordrecht: Sprin-ger, 2013. 189-214.spa
dc.relation.referencesBukve, Oddbjørn. Designing Social Science Research. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesBunge, Mario. The Sociology-Philosophy Connection. London: Transaction Publi-shers, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarnap, Rudolf. The Unity of Science. Trad. Max Black. London: Thoemmes Press, 1935.spa
dc.relation.referencesCartwright, Nancy y Eleonora Montuschi, eds. Philosophy of Social Science. A New Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesChakravartty, Anjan. “Scientific Realism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, 2017. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/>spa
dc.relation.referencesDilthey, Wilhelm. Introducción a las ciencias del espíritu. Trad. Eugenio Imaz. Méxi-co, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1949.spa
dc.relation.referencesElster, Jon. Explaining Social Behavior More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, Brian. “Social Ontology”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Ed-ward N. Zalta, Summer 2018 Edition. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/social-ontology/>spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, Randall. “Sociology Proscience or Antiscience?” American Sociological Re-view 54.1 (1989): 124-139. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2095666>spa
dc.relation.referencesdella Porta, Donatella y Michael Keating. “How many Approaches in the Social Sciences? An Epistemological Introduction”. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective. Eds. Donatella della Porta y Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 19-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesFeyerabend, Paul. Against Method. 3rd ed. New York, NJ: Verso, 1993.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldthorpe, John H. Sociology as a Population Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuala, Francesco. “Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Naturalism and Anti-Natura-lism in the Philosophy of Social Science”. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Ed. Paul Humphreys. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 43-64.spa
dc.relation.referencesHacking, Ian. ¿La construcción social de qué? Trad. Jesús Sánchez Navarro. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarp, Randall y Kareem Khalifa. “Realism and Antirealism”. The Routledge Com-panion to Philosophy of Social Science. Eds. Lee McIntyre y Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge, 2017. 254-269.spa
dc.relation.referencesHempel, Carl G. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1964.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, Paul. “Statistics and Causal Inference”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81.396 (1986): 945-960. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064>spa
dc.relation.referencesJarvie, Ian C. y Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, eds. Thesage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesKampourakis, Kostas y Tobias Uller. Philosophy of Science for Biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesKellert, Stephen H. et ál., eds. “Introduction: The Pluralist Stance”. Scientific Plura-lism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. vii-xviii.spa
dc.relation.referencesKitcher, Philip. “Toward a Pragmatist Philosophy of Science”. Theoria. An Interna-tional Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 28.2 (2013): 185-231. <https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.7014>spa
dc.relation.referencesKratochwil, Friedrich. “Constructivism: What It Is (not) and How It Matters”. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Eds. Donatella della Porta y Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 80-98spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuorikoski, Jaakko y Caterina Marchionni. “Evidential Diversity and the Triangu-lation of Phenomena”. Philosophy of Science 83.2 (2016): 227-247. <https://doi.org/10.1086/684960>spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, Bruno y Steve Woolgar. La vida en el laboratorio. La construcción de los hechos científicos. Trad. Eulalia Pérez Sedeño. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesLewens, Tim. The Meaning of Science. An Introduction to Philosophy of Science. New York, NJ: Basic Books, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, Daniel. A New Social Ontology of Government. Consent, Coordination, and Authority. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, Daniel. “Philosophy of Sociology”. Philosophies of the Sciences. A Guide. Ed. Fritz Allhoff. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 293-323.spa
dc.relation.referencesLivingstone Smith, David. “Naturalism”. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Eds. Lee McIntyre y Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge, 2017. 159-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesMäki, Uskali. “Reglobalizing Realism by Going Local, or (How) Should Our For-mulations of Scientific Realism be Informed about the Sciences?” Erkenntnis 63.1 (2005): 231-251. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3227-6>spa
dc.relation.referencesMcIntyre, Lee y Alex Rosenberg, eds. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of So-cial Science. London: Routledge, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesMills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination. 40th Anniversary Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan, Mary S. y Till Grüne-Yanoff. “Modeling Practices in the Social and Hu-man Sciences. An Interdisciplinary Exchange”. Perspectives on Science 21.2 (2013):143-156. <https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00089>spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan, Stephen L. y Christopher Winship. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesOdenbaugh, Jay y Paul Griffiths. “Philosophy of Biology”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2020 Edition, <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/biology-philosophy/>spa
dc.relation.referencesOkasha, Samir. Philosophy of Biology. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesPapineau, David. “Naturalism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Ed-ward N. Zalta, Summer 2021 Edition. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/naturalism/>spa
dc.relation.referencesPopper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesPotochnik, Angela. “The Diverse Aims of Science”. Studies in History and Philo-sophy of Science Part A 53.1 (2015): 1-10. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shp-sa.2015.05.008>spa
dc.relation.referencesPsillos, Stathis. Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesRisjord, Mark. Philosophy of Social Science: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesRorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Prince-ton University Press, 1980.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchuster, Federico. “Los desafíos del realismo en la filosofía de las ciencias socia-les”. Ontología social: una disciplina de frontera. Eds. Jaime Ramos Arenas y Carlos Andrés Ramírez. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2018. 193-220.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, Charles. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man”. The Review of Metaphysics 25.1 (1971): 3-51. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20125928>spa
dc.relation.referencesWinch, Peter. The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. 2nd ed. Lon-don: Routledge, 1990.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3478
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectFilosofía de las ciencias socialesspa
dc.subjectPospositivismospa
dc.subjectRealismo científicospa
dc.subjectConstructivismo socialspa
dc.subjectIdealización en cienciasspa
dc.subjectEmpirismo abstractospa
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophy of social sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsPostpositivismspa
dc.subject.keywordsScientific realismspa
dc.subject.keywordsSocial constructivismspa
dc.subject.keywordsIdealization in sciencespa
dc.subject.keywordsAbstracted empirismspa
dc.titleFilosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicosspa
dc.title.translatedPhilosophy of Social Sciences: Development, Approaches and Ontological Commitmentsspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2021.jpg
Tamaño:
50.65 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia