Algunas reflexiones de Paul Karl Feyerabend en torno a los supuestos metafísicos del principio de complementariedad de Bohr: un aporte a la cuestión ciencia-metafísica

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGargiulo, Teresa
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:04:24Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:04:24Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-01
dc.description.abstractPaul Feyerabend revela los supuestos metafísicos implícitos en el principio de complementariedad de Niels Bohr. Advierte la necesidad de examinar racionalmente estos supuestos para evitar que estos degeneren en dogmas que imposibiliten el progreso de la teoría cuántica. El artículo tiene como objeto mostrar cómo, a partir de la crítica y análisis de estos supuestos ontológicos, este filósofo comienza a bosquejar su pluralismo teórico, el cual, en última instancia, constituye un modelo de ciencia donde la reflexión metafísica no solo tiene un importante papel precientífico, sino que es en ella misma donde se resuelve el curso de la actividad científica. Creemos que el pluralismo epistemológico, lejos de destruir la ciencia y promover el irracionalismo que habitualmente se le atribuye, nos señala una posible y auténtica solución al problema de la relación ciencia-metafísicaspa
dc.description.abstractenglishPaul Feyerabend reveals the metaphysical assumptions implicit in the principle of complementarity of Niels Bohr. He notes the need to examine rationally these assump-tions in order to prevent them from degenerating into dogmas that obstruct the progress of quantum theory. The objective of the article is showing how from the criticism of the ontological assumptions of the principle of complementarity our philosopher begins to draft his theoretical pluralism and, in definitively, a model of science where metaphysical reflection not only plays an important pre-scientific role, but is in itself where resolves the course of scientific activity. We think that epistemologist pluralism, far from destroy the science and promote the irrationalism which habitually adjudge itself, indicate us a possible and authentic solution to the science-metaphysics relationship problemeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i25.1656
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6276
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 25, 2012, 7-36.spa
dc.relation.referencesAgazzi, Evandro. Temas y problemas de filosofía de la física. Barcelona: Herder, 1978spa
dc.relation.referencesBohm, David. Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. Pennsylvania: Univer-sity of Pennsylvania Press, 1957spa
dc.relation.referencesCouvalis, George. “Feyerabend and Laymon on Brownian Motion”. Philo-sophy of Science 55.3 (1988): 415-421spa
dc.relation.referencesDilworth, Craig. The Metaphysics of Science. An Account of Modern Science in Terms of Principles, Laws and Theories. 2ª ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 173spa
dc.relation.referencesFeyerabend, Paul K. “Reseña de «Foundations of Quantum- Mechanics: A study in Continuity and Symmetry», por A. Landé”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7.28 (1957): 354-7. —. “Complementarity”. Aristotelian Society suplementary volumes 32 (1958): 75 -122 .—. “An attempt at a realistic interpretation of experience”. 1958. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 17-36.—. “Professor Bhom ́s philosophy of nature”. 1960. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 219 -35. —. “On the Interpretation of scientific theories”. 1960. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 37- 43. —. “Two Letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on a Draft of the Structure of Scientific Revolutions” 1961. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26.3 (1995): 353-87. —. “Problems of Microphysics”. Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Ed. R. G. Colodny. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962. University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science Volume 1. —. “Hidden variables and the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen”. 1962 . Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 298-342. —. Límites de la ciencia. Explicación, reducción y empirismo. Trad. Ana Carmen Pérez Salvador & María del Mar Seguí. Barcelona: Paidós, 1989. Trad. de “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism”. Scientific Explanation, Space & Time. Ed. Herbert Feigl & Grover Maxwell. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (1962): 28-97. —. “Realism and Instrumentalism: Comments on the Logic of Factual Support”. 1964. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 176-202. —. “Reply to criticism. Comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam”. 1965. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 10 4 -131. —. “Dialectical Materialism and the Quantum Theory”. Slavic Review 25.3 (19 6 6 ) : 414 -17. —. Problems of Empiricism. In Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Ed. R. Colodny. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg, 1965. —. “On a Recent Critique of Complementarity: Part I”. Philosophy of Science35.4 (1968): 309-31. —. “Niels Bohr ́s world view”. 1968. Realism, rationalism and scientific method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 247-97. —. “Linguistic arguments and scientific method”. 1969. Realism, rationalism and scientific method. Philosophical Papers vol. I. 1981. 146-60.—. La ciencia en una sociedad libre. Trad. Alberto Elena. Madrid: Siglo XXI, [1978] 1982 . —. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers vol. I.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.—. Matando el tiempo. Autobiografía. Trad. Fabián Chueca. Madrid: Debate, 1995. —. Ambigüedad y armonía. Trad. Antoni Beltrán y José Romo. Barcelona: Paidós, 1999.—. Provocaciones filosóficas. Introd., trad., Ed. Ana P. Estevez Fernanadex. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, [1991] 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesGentile, Nélida. “El camino de Feyerabend: crítica, proliferación y realismo”. Filosofía Unisinos 8.2 (2007): 109-127spa
dc.relation.referencesHoward, Don. “Who Invented the «Copenhagen Interpretation»? A Study in Mythology”. Philosophy of Science 71.5 (2004): 669-82spa
dc.relation.referencesLaymon, Ronald. “Feyerabend, Brownian Motion, and the Hiddenness of Refuting Facts”. Philosophy of Science 44.2 (1977): 225-47spa
dc.relation.referencesMackay, Donald M. “Complementarity II”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volumes 32 (1958): 105-22spa
dc.relation.referencesOberheim, Eric & Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. “Feyerabend ́s Early Philo-sophy”. Essay Review. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31.2 (2000): 363-75spa
dc.relation.referencesPopper, Karl R. Quantum Theory and the Schismo in Physics. Londres: Hutchinson, 1982spa
dc.relation.referencesPreston, John, Gonzalo Munévar y Lamb, David. Eds. The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in memory of Paul Feyerabend. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000spa
dc.relation.referencesSirtres D. & E. Oberheim. “Einstein, Entropy and Anomalies”. Albert Eins-tein Century International Conference. Aip Conference Proceedings. Ed. J. M. Alimi & A. Füzfa. American Institute of Physics. 861 (2006): 1147-1154.spa
dc.relation.referencesTheocharis, Theo & Psimopoulis, Mihalis. “Where Science Has Gone Wr on g ”. Nature 329.6140 (1987): 595-598.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1656
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectFeyerabendspa
dc.subjectMetafísicaspa
dc.subjectRelación ciencia-metafísicaspa
dc.subjectPrincipio de complementariedadspa
dc.subjectNiels Bohrspa
dc.subject.keywordsFeyerabendspa
dc.subject.keywordsMetaphysicsspa
dc.subject.keywordsScience-metaphysics relationshipspa
dc.subject.keywordsPrinciple of complementarityspa
dc.subject.keywordsNiels Bohrspa
dc.titleAlgunas reflexiones de Paul Karl Feyerabend en torno a los supuestos metafísicos del principio de complementariedad de Bohr: un aporte a la cuestión ciencia-metafísicaspa
dc.title.translatedSome reflections of PAul KArl Feyerabend on the metaphysical presupositions of Bohr’s complementariety rrinciple: A contribution to the question science-metaphysicsspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2012.jpg
Tamaño:
102.62 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia