Rendimiento diagnóstico de la biopsia con aguja 20g ProCore® en el estudio de pacientes con masas periampulares

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorPedraza Ciro, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorPeña Chacón, Nicolás Rafael
dc.contributor.orcidPeña Chacón, Nicolás Rafael [0000-0002-2668-9761]
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T18:43:00Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T18:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.description.abstractEn la actualidad, el cáncer de páncreas y otros cánceres periampulares constituyen un problema de salud pública al punto que se ha tornado un desafío para el equipo médico, debido a la dificultad de brindar un diagnóstico adecuado, pertinente y así, un enfoque terapéutico oportuno para los pacientes.
dc.description.abstractenglishCurrently, pancreatic cancer and other periampullary cancers constitute a public health problem to the point that it has become a challenge for the medical team, due to the difficulty of providing an adequate, relevant diagnosis and thus, a timely therapeutic approach for patients.
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameMédico Cirujanospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/12207
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad El Bosquespa
dc.publisher.programMedicinaspa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization. Estimated age-standardized incidence rates (World) in 2020, pancreas, both sexes, all ages [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
dc.relation.referencesAl-Hawary MM, Kaza RK, Francis IR. Optimal Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis and Staging of Periampullary Masses. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25(2):239–53.
dc.relation.referencesRobles-Rivera FJ, Alonso-Larraga JO, Mora-Levy GD la, Hernández-Guerrero A, Blancarte-Flores JH, Robles-Rivera FJ, et al. Comparación de diferentes tipos de agujas para la obtención de tejido en tumores sólidos de páncreas. Endoscopia. 2019;31:7–14.
dc.relation.referencesAlessandrino F, Souza D, Ivanovic AM, Radulovic D, Yee EU, Mortele KJ. MDCT and MRI of the ampulla of Vater. Part II: non-epithelial neoplasms, benign ampullary disorders, and pitfalls. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(8):3292–312.
dc.relation.referencesSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2021 May;71(3):209–49.
dc.relation.referencesPark W, Chawla A, O’Reilly EM. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review. JAMA. 2021;326(9):851.
dc.relation.referencesMcGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. WJG. 2018;24(43):4846–61.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization. Colombia: Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence by cancer site. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
dc.relation.referencesPiñeros M, Pardo C, Gamboa O, Hernández G. Atlas de mortalidad por cáncer Colombia. 4ta ed. Vol. 1. Colombia: Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; 2017.
dc.relation.referencesAk M, Eleneen Y, Ayoub M, Colen RR. Cancer Imaging in Immunotherapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1342:431–47.
dc.relation.referencesLevine I, Trindade AJ. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes. WJG. 2021;27(26):4194–207.
dc.relation.referencesItonaga M, Ashida R, Kitano M. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) with Image Enhancement. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(11):888.
dc.relation.referencesOrtega D, Bandres D, Romero S, Díaz C, Garcia V. Biopsia con aguja ProCore® guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico en lesiones del tracto gastrointestinal. Gen. 2018;72(1):10–5.
dc.relation.referencesVilmann P, SĂftoiu A, Hollerbach S, Skov BG, Linnemann D, Popescu CF, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS–FNA needles in solid masses. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013;48(7):877–83.
dc.relation.referencesWatanabe S, Miyoshi J, Toki M, Kambayashi K, Kitada S, Nosaka T, et al. Effectiveness of introducing a 20-gauge core biopsy needle with a core trap in EUS-FNA/B for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):8.
dc.relation.referencesAhmad SR, Adler DG. Cancer of the ampulla of vater: current evaluation and therapy. Hosp Pract (1995). 2014;42(5):45–61.
dc.relation.referencesAhn DH, Bekaii-Saab T. Ampullary cancer: an overview. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014;112–5.
dc.relation.referencesCai J, Chen H, Lu M, Zhang Y, Lu B, You L, et al. Advances in the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: Trends, risk factors, screening, and prognosis. Cancer Letters. 2021;520:1–11.
dc.relation.referencesMaisonneuve P. Epidemiology and burden of pancreatic cancer. La Presse Médicale. 2019;48(3):e113–23.
dc.relation.referencesRawla P, Thandra KC, Sunkara T. Pancreatic cancer and obesity: epidemiology, mechanism, and preventive strategies. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2019;12(4):285–91.
dc.relation.referencesUreña JF. Cancer de pancreas. Revista Medica Sinergia. 2017;2(8):3–6.
dc.relation.referencesLoveday BP, Lipton L, Thomson BN. Pancreatic cancer: An update on diagnosis and management. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(12):826–31.
dc.relation.referencesMoore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 8va ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017. 2966 p.
dc.relation.referencesRoss MH, Pawlina W. Histología: texto y atlas color con biología celular y molecular. 5ta ed. Argentina: Ed. Médica Panamericana; 2007. 998 p.
dc.relation.referencesLee ES. Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A state-of-the-art review. WJG. 2014;20(24):7864.
dc.relation.referencesIglesias García J, Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz J. Biopsia guiada por ecografía endoscópica en la evaluación de los tumores pancreáticos. Gastroenterología y Hepatología. 2007;30(10):597–601.
dc.relation.referencesBang J, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore® and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2015;48(04):339–49.
dc.relation.referencesDuarte-Medrano GA, Téllez-Ávila FI. Rendimiento diagnóstico de la biopsia con aguja ProCore® TM guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico en pacientes con una primera USEBAAF no diagnóstica y lesiones de difícil diagnóstico por USE-BAAF. Endoscopia. 2013;25(3):100–4.
dc.relation.referencesCho E, Park CH, Kim TH, Cho CM, Seo DW, Kim J, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial comparing 25-gauge and 20-gauge biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1310–7.
dc.relation.referencesMangiavillano B, Sosa-Valencia L, Deprez P, Eisendrath P, Robles-Medranda C, Eusebi LH, et al. Tissue acquisition and pancreatic masses: Which needle and which acquisition technique should be used? Endosc Int Open. 2020;08(10):E1315–20.
dc.relation.referencesIglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz EJ, Abdulkader I, Larino-Noia J, Eugenyeva E, Lozano-Leon A, et al. Influence of On-Site Cytopathology Evaluation on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) of Solid Pancreatic Masses. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;106(9):1705–10.
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology. cancer.org. 2019 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. Tasas de supervivencia del cáncer de páncreas. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/es/cancer/tipos/cancer-de-pancreas/deteccion-diagnostico-clasificacion-por-etapas/tasas-de-supervivencia.html.
dc.relation.referencesTorregroza-Diazgranados EDJ. Pruebas diagnósticas: Fundamentos de los estudios diagnósticos, evaluación de la validez e interpretación clínica de sus resultados. Rev Colomb Cir. 2021;36(2):193–204.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAguja 20 ProCore
dc.subjectBiopsia por aguja fina
dc.subjectDiagnóstico
dc.subjectMasas periampulares
dc.subjectEspecificidad
dc.subjectSensibilidad
dc.subject.keywords20 ProCore needle
dc.subject.keywordsFine needle biopsy
dc.subject.keywordsDiagnosis
dc.subject.keywordsPeriampullary masses
dc.subject.keywordsSpecificity
dc.subject.keywordsSensitivity
dc.subject.nlmW100
dc.titleRendimiento diagnóstico de la biopsia con aguja 20g ProCore® en el estudio de pacientes con masas periampulares
dc.title.translatedDiagnostic performance of 20g ProCore® needle biopsy in the study of patients with periampullary masses
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
Trabajo de Grado.pdf
Tamaño:
366.6 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Anexo 2 Formato para la recolección de los datos.pdf
Tamaño:
32.97 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.95 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Medicina