La vigencia de la metafísica evolucionista de Peirce

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Eugenio
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0133-5251
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T14:38:27Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T14:38:27Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.description.abstractEn este artículo presento a Charles S. Peirce como un autor inmerso en los debates científicos de su época, cuya mirada integradora lo convierte en precursor de las actuales investigaciones sobre el comportamiento de sistemas auto-organizantes lejos del equilibrio y de una “síntesis evolutiva expandida” que no solo toma elementos de diversas ramas de la biología sino de la física. Esta capacidad de síntesis no debe sorprendernos si se examina la influencia del pensamiento evolutivo de Lamarck y Darwin, que junto con la mecánica estadística de Boltzmann y Maxwell ejercieron sobre la metafísica evolucionista Peirce. En este sentido presento la noción de “hábito” lamarckiano, como el factor mediador entre las perturbaciones provocadas por las circunstancias externas y las variaciones morfológicas heredables de los organismos, la cual por generalización contribuyó a la formulación de la categoría de la terceridad, mientras que la triada darwiniana variación, herencia y selección fue entendida como una especificación de las categorías de primeridad, segundidad y terceridad. Por otra parte, Boltzmann influyó en la acep-tación del azar ontológico (primeridad) y la idea de una flecha del tiempo irreversible y continuo, asociada a la terceridad. Discuto cómo, en oposición a la recurrencia cíclica en un universo ergódico propuesta por Poincaré, Peirce propuso ad hoc la “ley de la mente” para salvar la flecha del tiempo irreversible y creativo. En el contexto de la ciencia del siglo XIX, era correcto postular la “ley de la mente” para salvar la idea de evolución como argumento irrefutable y convincente en contra de la hegemónica visión mecánica de la naturaleza que no podía explicar a) la determinación de las condiciones iniciales, b) la emergencia de comportamientos orientados a metas específicas, y c) las bifurcaciones evolutivas generadas en elecciones impredecibles. La influencia de Maxwell en Peirce, se percibe en las explicaciones sobre los efectos anti-entrópicos ordenadores, las contingencias temporales, las bifurcaciones en momentos críticos y la argumentación contra la ergodicidad del universo. Para finalizar, presento una reflexión sobre la vigencia de las ideas peirceanas sobre la “evolución agapástica”, donde la “elección individual”, el hábito, la inteligencia promueven la cooperación, la reciprocidad, la asociación simbió-tica y mutualista, contribuyendo así al incremento del potencial creativo de la naturaleza.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishIn this contribution I present Charles S. Peirce as an author deeply immersed in the scientific debates of his time, with a synthetic mind that makes him a forerunner todays’ far from equilibrium self-organization and an advocate of an “expanded evolutionary synthesis” that takes into account elements from diverse branches of biology and also from physics. That should not be a surprise as it is examined the influences that Lamarc-kian and Darwinian evolutionary theories, and Boltzmann and Maxwell ́s mechanical statistical theories, exerted on Peirce’s evolutionary metaphysics. Along these lines I show how the Lamarckian notion of habit, understood as the mediatory factor between organisms’ perturbations provoked by external circumstances and heritable morpholo-gical variations, through its generalization contributed to the formulation of thirdness category, while the Darwinian triad variation, heredity and selection, was understood as an specification of Peircean categories firstness, secondness, and thirdness. Furthermore I show Boltzmann ́s influence on the acceptance of ontological chance that Peirce included into the category of firstness and the ensuing idea of an arrow of irreversible and conti-nuous time, associated with thirdness. I discuss one of the reasons that moved Peirce to propose ad hoc the “law of mind” in order to save the creative and irreversible time arrow that was questioned by Poincare’s cyclic recurrence in an ergodic universe. Thus, in the context of XIXth century science, it was correct to postulate the “law of mind” in order to save the idea of evolution as a convincing and irrefutable argument against mechanistic hegemonic interpretations of nature that could not account for: a) the determination of initial conditions, b) the emergence of behaviors oriented to specific goals, and c) evolutionary bifurcations generated out of unpredictable choices. Maxwell ́s influence on Peirce is notorious in his accounts of ordering anti-entropic effects, temporal contin-gencies, bifurcations at unstable critical points and arguments against the ergodicity of the universe. To conclude I present a consideration over Peirce’s “agapastic” evolution, where “individual elections”, habit and intelligence promote cooperation, reciprocity, mutualistic and symbiotic associations that thus contribute to the increment of the crea-tive potential of nature.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v14i28.675
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6259
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 14 Núm 28, 2014, 83-121.spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, Eugenio. Los demonios de Darwin. Semiótica y termodinámica de la evolución. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2009.—. La ontogenia del pensamiento evolutivo, Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia – Obra Selecta, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaldwin, James. “A New Factor in Evolution.”American Naturalist30 (1896): 441-451, 536-553.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowles, Samuel. Gintis, Herbert. A Cooperative Species. Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrillouin, Leon. “Maxwell’s Demon Cannot Operate: Infromation and Entropy I.” Journal of Applied Physics 22 (1951): 334-37.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrooks, Daniel. Wiley, E. O.. Evolution as Entropy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurkhardt, Richard W. The Spirit of System. Lamarck and Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaponi, Gustavo. “Contra la lectura adaptacionista de Lamarck”, en: Alejandro Rosas (ed.), Filosofía, Darwinismo y Evolución, Bogotá: Univer-sidad Nacional de Colombia (2009): 3-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesDarwin, Charles. The origin of species by means of Natural Selection or the pres-ervation of favoured races in the struggle for life (edition based on the text of first edition, London: Murray), London: ElecBook, 1997.—. “Letter 2449 – Darwin to Wallace, 6 April 1859” (accesible www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2449).—. “Letter to Asa Gray”, en: Francis Darwin (ed.), Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Middlesex: The Echo Library, vol.II, 459 (accesible www.echo-library.com). —. “Letter 3822 – Darwin to Hooker, 24 November 1862” (accesible https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/darwinletters/calendar/entry-3822.html).—. The Descent of Man And Selection in Relation to Sex (vol. 1), London: Murray, 1871. —. The Origin of Species by means of natural selection or the rpeservation of favored races in the struggle for life, London: Murray, 1872 (Sixth Edition). —. The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Action of Worms with Obser-vations on Their Habits, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1985.—. El Origen de las Especies, Barcelona: Edicomunicación, 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesDawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene, New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.spa
dc.relation.referencesDepew, David. & Weber, Bruce. Darwinism Evolving. Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesEigen, Manfred. “Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules”, Naturwissenschaften 58 (1971): 465-523.spa
dc.relation.referencesEco, Umberto. “Metaphor”, en: M. Dascal, D. Gerhardus, K. Lorenz, G. Meggle (eds.), Philosophy of Language. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research 2 (1996): 1313-1323.spa
dc.relation.referencesEsposito, Joseph. Evolutionary Metaphysics. The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Categories, Athens: Ohio University Press, 1980.spa
dc.relation.referencesFisher, Ronald. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.spa
dc.relation.referencesGissis, Snait. Jablonka, Eva. Transformations of Lamarckism. From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesGriffin, Donald. Animal Minds, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.spa
dc.relation.referencesJablonka, Eva. & Lamb, Marion. “Epigenetic inheritance in evolution”, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11 (1998): 159-183.—. Evolution in four dimensions. Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaeger, Werner. La Teología de los Primeros Filósofos Griegos, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnston, T. D. “Toward a Systems View of Development: An Appraisal of Lehrman’s Critique of Lorenz”, en: S. Oyama, E. Griffiths, R. Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency. Developmental Systems and Evolution, Cambridge: The MIT Press, (2001):15-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesJonas, Hans. The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.spa
dc.relation.referencesKauffman, Stuart. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.—. Investigations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.—. “Towards a Post Reductionist Science: The Open Universe” (accesible https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.2492v1.pdf )spa
dc.relation.referencesKropotkin, Piotr. Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution (accesible www.marxists.org/reference/archive/kropotkin-peter/1902/mutual aid/index.htm).spa
dc.relation.referencesHausman, Carl. Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamarck, Jean-Baptiste. Recherches sur l’organization des corps vivants, París: Pole HSTL du CRHST, Unité Mixte de Recherche CNRS/Cité des sciences et de l’industrie, 2001 (accesible https://www.crhst.cnrs.fr).—. Filosofía zoológica, Barcelona: Alta Fulla, 1986. —. “Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres”, en: (Burkhardt 1995, 169-170).spa
dc.relation.referencesLloyd, Seth. Programming the Universe, New York: Knopf, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesLovejoy, Arthur. La Gran Cadena del Ser. Historia de una Idea, Barcelona: Icaria, 1983.spa
dc.relation.referencesMargulis, Lynn. “On Origen of Mitosing Cells”, Journal of theoretical biology 14 (3) (1967): 225-274.spa
dc.relation.referencesMargulis, Lynn. Origins of Eukaryotic Cells, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaturana, Humberto. Varela, Francisco. The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, London: Shambala, 1992 (revised edition).spa
dc.relation.referencesMaxwell, James Clerk. “Letter to Galton – 28 February 1870”, en: J. C. Maxwell, The Scientific Letters and Papers of James Clerk Maxwell: 1874-1879 (ed. Harman) (vol. 3), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1990): 31.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaxwell, James Clerk. Theory of Heat, London: Longmans, Green and Co, 1871.spa
dc.relation.referencesMc Mullin, Ernan. “From matter to materialism ... and (almost) back”, en: Davies, N. H. Gregersen (eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2010): 13-37.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenand, Louis. El club de los metafísicos. Historia de las ideas en América, Barcelona: Destino, 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesMereschkowski, C. “Over nature and origin. Chromatophoren in the Pflanzenreiche”, Biol. Centralbl. 25 (1905), 593-604, 689-691 (traducción al inglés: W. Martin, K. V. Kowallik, “Annotated English translation of Mereschkowsky’s 1905 Paper “Over nature and origin. Chromatophoren in the Pflanzenreiche”, Eur. J. Phycol. 34 (1999): 287–295).spa
dc.relation.referencesMonod, Jacques. El Azar y la Necesidad. Ensayo sobre la Filosofía Natural de la Biología Moderna, Barcelona: Orbis, 1970.spa
dc.relation.referencesPopper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1968. —. Unended Quest, Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 1976.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrigogine, Ilya. Stengers, Isabelle. Order out of Chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature, New York: Bantam Books, 1984.spa
dc.relation.referencesReynolds, Andrew. Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics. The Philosophy of Chance, Law and Evolution, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesRiedl, Rupert. Biología del conocimiento. Los fundamentos filogenéticos de la razón, Barcelona: Labor Universitaria, 1983.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuse, Michael. El Misterio de los Misterios. ¿Es la evolución una construcción social?, Barcelona: Metatemas, 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesRussell, Bertrand. La Sabiduría de Occidente, Madrid: Aguilar, 1960.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalthe, Stanley. Development and Evolution. Complexity and Change in Biology, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1993. —. “Energy, Development, and Semiosis”, en: E. Taborsky (ed.), Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign, Aachen: Shaker Verlag, (1999): 245-261.—. “The Spontaneous Origin of New Levels in a Scalar Hierarchy”, Entropy6 (2004): 327-343.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchneider, Eric. Sagan, Dorion. Into the Cool. Energy Flow, Thermodynamics and Life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesShort, T. L. “Darwin’s concept of final cause: neither new nor trivial”, Biology and Philosophy 17 (2002): 323-340.—. Peirce’s Theory of Signs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesStewart, Ian. ¿Juega Dios a los dados? La nueva matemática del caos, Barce-lona: Grijalbo, 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesStewart, John. La Vie existe-t-elle? Reconcilier genetique et biologie, París: Vuibert, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesVarela, Francisco. “Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition”, Brain and Cognition 34 (1) (1997), 72–87.spa
dc.relation.referencesVillaveces, José Luis. Cubillos, Germán. Andrade, Eugenio. “Del Sustancia-lismo al Atomismo en la Química”, en: Hacia una historia epistemológica de la química, Bogotá: Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Colección Enrique Pérez Arbeláez 8, (1989): 53-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesWaddington, Conrad. The Strategy of the Genes, London: Geo Allen & Unwin, 1957.—. “Genetic assimilation”, Advances Genetics 10 (1961): 257-293.spa
dc.relation.referencesWest-Eberhardt, Mary Jane. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, George. Adaptation and Natural Selection. A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.spa
dc.relation.referencesWright, Sewall. “Evolution in Mendelian Populations”, Genetics 16 (1931): 97-159 (reimpreso en S. Wright, Evolution: Selected Papers (ed. Provine), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1986): 98-160).—. “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution”, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Congress of Genetics 1 (1932): 356-366 (reimpreso en S. Wright, Evolution: Selected Papers (ed. Provine), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1986): 161-177.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/675
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectPeircespa
dc.subjectHábitospa
dc.subjectSelección naturalspa
dc.subjectAzarspa
dc.subjectBifurcaciónspa
dc.subjectLey de la mentespa
dc.subjectLamarckspa
dc.subjectDarwinspa
dc.subjectBoltzmannspa
dc.subjectMaxwellspa
dc.subject.keywordsPeircespa
dc.subject.keywordsHabitspa
dc.subject.keywordsNatural selectionspa
dc.subject.keywordsChancespa
dc.subject.keywordsBifurcationspa
dc.subject.keywordsLaw of mindspa
dc.subject.keywordsLamarckspa
dc.subject.keywordsDarwinspa
dc.subject.keywordsBoltzmannspa
dc.subject.keywordsMaxwellspa
dc.titleLa vigencia de la metafísica evolucionista de Peircespa
dc.title.translatedToday’s validity of Peirce’s evolutionary metaphysicsspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2014.jpg
Tamaño:
56.23 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia