Maxillary transverse dimensions in subjects with and without impacted canines: a comparative cone-beam computed tomography study

dc.contributor.authorArboleda Ariza, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorSchilling, Juan
dc.contributor.authorRuíz-Mora, Gustavo Armando
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Cárdenas, Yalil Augusto
dc.contributor.authorARRIOLA-GUILLÉN, LUIS ERNESTO
dc.contributor.authorAliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
dc.contributor.orcidArboleda Ariza, Nicolás [0000-0002-0756-7814]
dc.contributor.orcidArboleda Ariza, Nicolás [0000-0002-0756-7814]
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-23T16:03:21Z
dc.date.available2020-04-23T16:03:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractenglishIntroduction: The objective of this study was to compare the maxillary transverse dimensions between subjects with impacted maxillary canines and subjects without canine impactions, with similar vertical and sagittal fea-tures. Methods: In this retrospective study, 86 cone-beam computed tomography images of subjects with impacted maxillary canines (45 unilateral, 41 bilateral) and 67 images of subjects without dental impactions(control group) matched by similar vertical (NSAr, SArGo, ArGoMe) and sagittal (ANB, SNA, APDI) skeletal characteristics, were analyzed. The maxillary width was measured at 4 levels: first molar basal width, first molar alveolar width, first premolar basal width, and first premolar alveolar width. Group comparisons were performed with analysis of variance and post-hoc Scheff e tests. The influence of group features on the transverse dimensions was evaluated by multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Groups with unilateral and bilateral impacted maxillary canines showed significantly smaller first molar basal widths, first molar alveolar widths, and first premolar alveolar widths compared with the control group (P50.030, P\0.001, andP\0.001, respectively). First premolar basal widths were not significantly different among the groups. Conclusions: Subjects with unilateral or bilateral impacted maxillary canines have smaller maxillary transverse dimensions than subjects without impaction. Orthodontists should consider the relationship of maxillary width and canine impaction during diagnosis and treatment planningeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.017
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2330
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMosby Inc.spa
dc.publisher.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1097-6752, Vol. 154, Nro. 4, 2018, p. 495-503spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088954061830489X
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf401
dc.rights.creativecommons2018
dc.rights.localAcceso cerradospa
dc.subject.decsErupción Dentalspa
dc.subject.decsMaloclusiónspa
dc.subject.decsOrtodoncistasspa
dc.subject.decsOrtodoncia correctivaspa
dc.subject.keywordsMaxillary transversespa
dc.subject.keywordsMaxillary canines.spa
dc.subject.keywordsFirst premolarspa
dc.titleMaxillary transverse dimensions in subjects with and without impacted canines: a comparative cone-beam computed tomography studyspa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localartículospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Arboleda-Ariza N., Schilling J., Arriola-Guillén L. E., Ruíz-Mora G. A._2018.pdf
Tamaño:
716.34 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones