Postoperative neurosensory impairment perception using ultrasonic BoneScalpel and conventional rotary instruments after bilateral split sagittal osteotomy

dc.contributor.authorRuiz Valero, Carlos Alberto
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Delgado, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorNatalia Henao-Moreno
dc.contributor.orcidGómez-Delgado, Andrés [0000-0001-8679-163X]
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T17:32:33Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T17:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-14
dc.description.abstractenglishPurpose Although bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most widely used surgical technique for the correction of mandibular dentofacial anomalies, it is associated with lesion of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and unwanted neurosensory disorders. The aim of this study was to document the perception of changes in sensitivity and mean recovery time after BSSO, using an ultrasonic BoneScalpel versus the conventional rotary instruments. Patients and methods This retrospective observational study included all patients with diagnosis of skeletal anomaly who underwent advancement or setback BSSO of less than 10 mL, using the ultrasonic osteotome or conventional rotary instruments. The patients were operated on at the Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, Bogotá Colombia, between 2017 and 2018. The primary predictor variable was the osteotomy technique. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of postoperative sensory alteration, whereas secondary outcomes were time of appearance and recovery, affected anatomical region, laterality, and disturbance in daily activities. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher’s exact test. Results Data of 38 patients were retrieved, of which 23 were operated with BoneScalpel and 13 with the conventional technique. Twenty patients were women and 18 were men. All patients reported experiencing at least one type of sensory disturbance immediately after the surgical procedure. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in the time that the alteration was present between the two groups, in favor of the BoneScalpel group. The chin and the lower lip were the anatomical regions with the greatest alteration in sensitivity and persistence of it. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that BoneScalpel is effective in performing BSSO. They also suggest that it may reduce the occurrence of nerve damage during BSSO, although more research on this topic is required.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-00945-z
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn1865-1569
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5520
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Naturespa
dc.publisher.journalOral and maxillofacial surgeryspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOral and maxillofacial surgery, 1865-1569, 2021spa
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10006-021-00945-z
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightsAcceso abierto
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.subject.keywordsSagittal split osteotomyspa
dc.subject.keywordsBoneScalpelspa
dc.subject.keywordsUltrasonic osteotomespa
dc.subject.keywordsOrthognathic surgeryspa
dc.titlePostoperative neurosensory impairment perception using ultrasonic BoneScalpel and conventional rotary instruments after bilateral split sagittal osteotomyspa
dc.title.translatedPostoperative neurosensory impairment perception using ultrasonic BoneScalpel and conventional rotary instruments after bilateral split sagittal osteotomyspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revista

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Carlos Alberto Ruiz Valero, Andrés Gómez-Delgado_2021.pdf
Tamaño:
634.55 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones