Fuerza adhesiva entre el zirconio y cementos-adhesivos bioactivos y/o con MDP - con y sin previo acondicionamiento dela superficie con arenado. Fase 1

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorLuna Ángel, Luis Eduardo
dc.contributor.advisorTamayo Muñoz, Martha Cecilia
dc.contributor.advisorRojas Benavidez, Edgar Rene
dc.contributor.advisorTorres Duran, Edgar
dc.contributor.advisorDíaz Báez, David Augusto
dc.contributor.authorCantarero Sandres, Chris Fabiola
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Xiques, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Marbelys Eduvigis
dc.contributor.authorPorras Vargas, Cristian Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T01:35:38Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T01:35:38Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-25
dc.description.abstractAntecedentes: El óxidó de zircónió es una ceramica pólicristalina, alótrópica y, dependiendó de la temperatura, presenta estructuras cristalinas muy usadas para restauraciónes esteticas en ódóntólógí a. Debidó a que carece de matriz ví trea nó es susceptible a una degradación ací dica ló cual cómprómete su adhesión durante la cementación de estas restauraciónes. Pór ló que se han própuestós diferentes prótócólós de cementación para óptimizar esta adhesión que incluyen: tratamientó de superficie cón arenadó, aplicación de i mprimadóres para zircónió y adhesivós, cementós cón móleculas funciónales especí ficas (10 -MDP) y cementós bióactivós, sin embargó, nó hay evidencia suficiente que sópórte el usó de un prótócóló estandarizadó de cementación adhesiva que den resultadós clí ni cós cónfiables. Objetivo: En esta primera fase se busca evaluar la resistencia adhesiva al zircónió translucidó de siete sistemas de cementación adhesiva sin previó acóndiciónamientó de superficie cón arenadó. Metodología: Este estudio experimental in-vitro utilizo una muestra probabilística por grupo de 21 cilindros de cementos de 3mm Æ x 1.0mm H, cementados sobre láminas de óxido de zirconio maquinado translúcido [Cercon® ht], de 15mm-L X 10mm-W X 3 mm-H. Se evaluaron 7 grupos correspondientes a 7 protocolos diferentes de adhesión constituidos por los cementos: PanaviaV5, Duo-link Universal™, Theracem® y Activa-BioACTIVE - con o sin agente adhesivo. Las láminas de zirconio fueron diseñadas en el sistema Rhinoceros 3D, se procesaron como archivo STL en el software EXOCAD, se maquinaron en la fresadora Programill PM5 y se sinterizaron en el horno Programat CS4. Las láminas fueron codificadas y asignadas aleatoriamente a los 7 grupos de estudio, se fabricaron y se cementaron 3 cilindros por lamina. Después, las láminas con los cilindros fueron almacenadas en agua destilada a temperatura ambiente por 24 horas y posteriormente fueron removidos los moldes cilíndricos de Tygon. Para la evaluación de la resistencia adhesiva, cada lámina de zirconio fue colocada en la máquina universal de prueba electromecánica, (Instron 3366®) y se aplicó una carga compresiva en la base de cada uno de los cilindros a una velocidad de 0.5 mm / min. Los resultados se reportaron en MPa. Como los datos no siguieron una distribución normal, se analizaron descriptivamente con medianas [Me] y [RIQ], y se compararon con las pruebas de Kruskal Wallis y comparaciones múltiples de Dunn. (p< 0.05). Resultados: Al comparar todos los grupos se observa que hubo diferencias significativas entre ellos (p=0.0001). Al comparar los grupos entre si se observa que la mayor resistencia adhesiva se obtuvo para el grupo Duo-link Universal™ /All-bond Universal® [Me: 50.39MPa RIQ: 34.0471.21], y fue diferente estadísticamente con respecto a C/u de los otros grupos estudiados (p< 0.001), y el cemento que reporto la menor resistencia adhesiva fue el Panavia V5 sin imprimador [Me: 12.95 MPa -RIQ: 8.78 17.89], e igualmente fue significativamente menor con respecto a todos los otros grupos de estudio(p< 0.006) excepto con el grupo ACTIVA BioACTIVE. Al analizar los Cementos Biactivos se observa que el grupo ACTIVA BioACTIVE fue el que presento la menor resistencia adhesiva [Me:18.99 MPa-RIQ:12.71-22.39] significativamente con respecto a todos los otros grupos (p< 0,035). Conclusiones: Bajó las limitaciónes de este estudió, se puede sugerir que la cementación de restauraciónes de zircónió pódrí a óbtener mejores resultadós utilizandó cementós resinósós que cón cementós bióactivós. Parece que el usó del agente adhesivó cón 10-MDP presenta mejóres resultadós de adhesión al zircónió, peró su incórpóración al cementó pódrí a nó ser relevante.
dc.description.abstractenglishBackground: Zirconium oxide is a polycrystalline, allotropic ceramic which depending on temperature may present crystalline structures widely used for aesthetic restorations. It lacks a vitreous matrix, therefore it is not susceptible to acidic degradation compromising its adhesion during cementation, so different protocols have been proposed such as sanded surface, primers for zirconium and adhesives, adhesives with specific molecules (10-MDP) and bioactive cements. However, there is not enough evidence supporting a standardized cementing protocol with reliable results. Objective: the objective of the present phase was to assess the adhesive resistance to ranslucent zirconium of seven cementing systems without previous surface conditioning. Methodology: Experimental, in-vitro study of 21 cylinders of 3 mm Æ x 1.0mm H cemented on machined translucent zirconium sheets [Cercon® ht] of 15mm- L X 10mm-W X 3 mm-H. Seven groups for seven different cementing protocols from PanaviaV5, Duo-link Universal™, Theracem® y Activa-BioACTIVE – with and without agent. The sheets were designed with Rhinoceros 3D, processed in EXOCAD, machined with Programill PM5 and synterised in a Programat CS4. Sheets were coded, randomly assigned to each group, produced and cemented three cylinders per sheet. These were stored in distilled water at ambient temperature for 24 hours and then the Tygon molds were removed. Each sheet was place on a universal testing machine (Instron 3366®), force at a speed of 0.5 mm / min. was applied with results reported in MPa. Data did not follow a normal distribution so it was analysed descriptely with medians [Me] and [RIQ], compared with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn. (p< 0.05) multiple comparisons. Results: There were significantly different results among them (p=0.0001). The highest resistance was from Duo-link Universal™ /All-bond Universal® [Me: 50.39MPa RIQ: 34.04-71.21], which was statistically different to the rest (p< 0.001), the cement with less resistance was Panavia V5 without primer [Me: 12.95 MPa -RIQ: 8.78 17.89] and significantly less than the rest (p<0.006) except ACTIVA BioACTIVE. This latter was observed least resistance [Me:18.99 MPa-RIQ:12.71-22.39] and well below the other groups (p<0,035). Conclusions: It may be suggested, within the limits of the study, that zirconium restoration cementations could have better results using resinous cements instead of bioactive, for the use with 10-MDP has been better but its incorporation to the cement could not be relevant.
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en prostodonciaspa
dc.description.sponsorshipLaboratorio de Biomateriales de UniCIEO
dc.description.sponsorshipGrupo de Investigación UNIECLO – Unidad de Epidemiologia Clínica Oral
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/12874
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad El Bosquespa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en prostodonciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbd El-Ghany O, Sherief A. Zirconia based ceramics, some clinical and biological aspects: Review. Futur Dent J. 2016;2(2):55-64.
dc.relation.referencesAfrasiabi A, Mostajir E, Golbari N. The effect of Z-primer on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic to dentin: in vitro. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Jul 1;10(7):e661-e664
dc.relation.referencesAfutu R, Daddona J, Dunn K, Finkelman M, Tran A and Kugel G. Shear Bond Strength of Several Dental Cements. J Dental Sci 2019, 4(3): 000234
dc.relation.referencesAl-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Aug;37(8):641-52.
dc.relation.referencesAl-Zordk W, Ali AI. Retention strength of zirconia occlusal veneer restoration. Effect of dental bonding surface and cement type. Int J Esthet Dent. 2023 Jul 18;18(3):292-308.
dc.relation.referencesAlammar A, Blatz MB. The resin bond to high-translucent zirconia-A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jan;34(1):117-35.
dc.relation.referencesAlqutaibi AY, Ghulam O, Krsoum M, Binmahmoud S, Taher H, Elmalky W, Zafar MS. Revolution of Current Dental Zirconia: A Comprehensive Review. Molecules. 2022 Mar 4;27(5):1699.
dc.relation.referencesAltan B, Cinar S, Tuncelli B. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia-based monolithic CAD-CAM materials to resin cement after different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;22(11):1475-1482.
dc.relation.referencesCarrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-a systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 7;12(5):790.
dc.relation.referencesChen L, Suh B.I. Universal adhesive improved bond strengths of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent. Mat. 2019 Oct; 35(1):49
dc.relation.referencesChen L, Yang J, Wang JR, Suh BI. Physical and biological properties of a newly developed calcium silicate-based self-adhesive cement. Am J Dent. 2018 Apr;31(2):86-90.
dc.relation.referencesChen Y, Lu Z, Qian M, Zhang H, Xie H, Chen C. Effect of 10-Methacryloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate Concentration on Chemical Coupling of Methacrylate Resin to Yttria-stabilized Zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(4):349-55.
dc.relation.referencesComino-Garayoa R, Peláez J, Tobar C, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 22;14(11):2751
dc.relation.referencesCuevas-Suárez CE, de Oliveira da Rosa WL, Vitti RP, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies. J Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;29(4):298-308
dc.relation.referencesEngqvist H, Schultz-Walz JE, Loof J, Botton GA, Mayer D, Phaneuf MW, Ahnfelt NO, Hermansson L. Chemical and biological integration of a mouldable bioactive ceramic material capable of forming apatite in vivo in teeth. Biomaterials. 2004 Jun;25(14):2781-7
dc.relation.referencesFukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 2006 Oct;85(10):941-4.
dc.relation.referencesFurtado de Carvalho R, Bergoli C, Marques de Melo R, Anami L, Bottino M, Özcan M, Gurgel De Carvalho I, Assunção e Souza R. Does the zirconia cleaning protocol followed by vitrification increase the resin-bond strength to zirconia? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2022; 36(12):1332–1345
dc.relation.referencesGarchitorena M. Materiales bioactivos en la remineralización dentinaria. Odont Est. 2016;25(28):11-19
dc.relation.referencesGarcía I, Soto-Montero J, Collares F, Giannini M. Bonding of Resin Cements to Ultra-Translucent Zirconia After Aging for 24 Hours and 1 Year. Int J Prosthodont. 2022; 35(4):460-70.
dc.relation.referencesGhoveizi R, Maleki M, Mir M, Beyabanaki E, Tavakolizadeh S. Effect of different power outputs of Er:YAG laser on shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia in comparison to sandblasting. Lasers dent. Sci. 2022; 6:41–6
dc.relation.referencesGracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):227-35.
dc.relation.referencesHajjaj MS, Barboud HM, Almashabi HK, Alzahrani SJ, Abu Haimed TS, Alnoury AS, Sulaiman TA. Evaluation of Different Priming Agents with Conventional and Bioactive Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Shear Bond Strength to Zirconia. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(14):8369.
dc.relation.referencesInokoshi M, Poitevin A, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness to different chemically pre-treated dental zirco‑ nia. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18:1803–12.
dc.relation.referencesKhan A, Syed M. A review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2019; 38(2): 163–176
dc.relation.referencesKhan AA, Al Kheraif AA, Jamaluddin S, Elsharawy M, Divakar DD. Recent Trends in Surface Treatment Methods for Bonding Composite Cement to Zirconia: A Reveiw. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(1):7-19.
dc.relation.referencesKumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):248-55.
dc.relation.referencesKumbuloglu, O., Lassila, L. V., User, A., & Vallittu, P. K. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2004; 17(3).
dc.relation.referencesKusolphat R, Aksornmuang J, Kukiattrakoon B. Shear Bond Strength of Dentin Bonded to Various Restorative Materials Using Universal Resin Cements. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2024;17(1):1–10
dc.relation.referencesŁagodzińska P, a Bociong K, Sokołowski J, Dejak B. Comparative study of the shear bond strength of zirconia-based dental ceramics to resin cements after chemo-mechanical surface treatment. J Stoma 2019 (72)4.
dc.relation.referencesLe M, Papia E, Larsson C. The effect of combining primers and cements from different cement systems on the bond strength between zirconia and dentin. BDJ Open. 2024;10(1):44. Published 2024 Jun 5.
dc.relation.referencesLima RBW, Barreto SC, Alfrisany NM, Porto TS, De Souza GM, De Goes MF. Effect of silane and MDP-based primers on physico-chemical properties of zirconia and its bond strength to resin cement. Dent Mater. 2019
dc.relation.referencesLiu J-F, Yang C-C, Luo J-L, Liu Y-C, Yan M, Ding S-J. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to a high transparency zirconia crown and dentin. J Dent Sci. 2021.
dc.relation.referencesMagne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater. 2010 Apr;26(4):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Jan 4. PMID: 20047757.
dc.relation.referencesMahrous A, Radwan MM, Kamel SM. Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Novel MDP Calcium- Fluoride-Releasing Self-Adhesive Resin Cement After Thermocycling. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):445-55.
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado A, Porras P. Evaluación de resistencia adhesiva entre cementos resinosos y cerámica policristalina usando zirconia primers y adhesivos con MDP- con y sin microarenado[trabajo de grado]. Bogotá DC: Programa de especialización en Prostodoncia -Universidad El Bosque; 2021.
dc.relation.referencesMalysa A, Wezgowiec J, Grzebieluch W, Danel DP, Wieckiewicz M. Effect of Thermocycling on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements Used for Luting CAD/CAM Ceramics to Human Dentin. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 11;23(2):745.
dc.relation.referencesMilani R, Lorenzi G, Soares C, Figueroa R, Cardoso T, BelmonteI J, Baumvol C, Perottoni J, Zorzi E, Dureza e resistência ao desgaste da camada de ZrN formada por nitretação a plasma sobre zircônia parcialmente estabilizada com ítria. Cerâmica. 2010;56(2010): 300-04
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud. Normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Resolución 8430 de 1993. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud- República de Colombia. 1993
dc.relation.referencesNagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Feitosa VP, Tamada Y, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Hayakawa S. Chemical interaction mechanism of 10-MDP with zirconia. Sci Rep. 2017
dc.relation.referencesNakayama D, Koizumi H, Komine F, Blatz MB, Tanoue N, Matsumura H. Adhesive bonding of zirconia with single-liquid acidic primers and a tri-n-butylborane initiated acrylic resin. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):305-10.
dc.relation.referencesÖzcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Feb;17(1):7-26.
dc.relation.referencesSakrana AA, Al-Zordk W, Shoukry H, Özcan M. Bond Strength Durability of Adhesive Cements to Translucent Zirconia: Effect of Surface Conditioning. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020 Nov 30;28(4):161-171.
dc.relation.referencesSalem RST, Ozkurt-Kayahan Z, Kazazoglu E. In Vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Three Primer/Resin Cement Systems to Monolithic Zirconia. Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Nov/Dec;32(6):519-25.
dc.relation.referencesSales A, Rodrigues SJ, Mahesh M, Ginjupalli K, Shetty T, Pai UY, Saldanha S, Hegde P, Mukherjee S, Kamath V, Bajantri P, Srikant N, Kotian R. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Micro-Shear Bond Strength and Surface Characteristics of Zirconia: An In Vitro Study. Int J Dent. 2022 Apr 14;2022:1546802.
dc.relation.referencesScaminaci Russo D, Cinelli F, Sarti C, Giachetti L. Adhesion to zirconia: a systematic review of current conditioning methods and bonding materials. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Aug 1;7(3):74.
dc.relation.referencesSerichetaphongse P, Chitsutheesiri S, Chengprapakorn W. Comparison of the shear bond strength of composite resins with zirconia and titanium using different resin cements. J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jan 11;66(1):109-116.
dc.relation.referencesSharafeddin F., Shoale S. Effects of Universal and Conventional MDP Primers on the Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramic and Nanofilled Composite Resin. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci., 2018 March; 19(1): 48-56.
dc.relation.referencesShokry M, Al-Zordk W, Ghazy M. Retention strength of monolithic zirconia crowns cemented with different primer-cement systems. BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 19;22(1):187.
dc.relation.referencesSo-Hyun K, Cho, S.-C, Lee, M.-H, Kim, H.-J., Oh, N.-S. Effect of 9% Hydrofluoric Acid Gel Hot-Etching Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Zirconia Ceramics. Medicina 2022, 58, 1469.
dc.relation.referencesStawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(5):369-80.
dc.relation.referencesStefani A, Brito RB Jr, Kina S, Andrade OS, Ambrosano GM, Carvalho AA, Giannini M. Bond strength of resin cements to zirconia ceramic using adhesive primers. J Prosthodont. 2016 Jul;25(5):380-5.
dc.relation.referencesSteiner R., Heiss-Kisielewsky I., Schwarz V., Schnabl D., Dumfahrt H., Laimer J., Steinmassl O., Steinmassl P.-A. Los cebadores de zirconio mejoran la resistencia de unión al cizallamiento del zirconio dental. J. Prosthodont. 2019
dc.relation.referencesTatiana R, Bérangère C, Prudence Felix T, Arnaud E, Fabio L, Jean R, Romain C, Hamdi J, Olivier E. Shear bond strength between standard or modified zirconia surfaces and two resin cements incorporating or not 10-MDP in their matrix. Dent Mater. 2024 Feb;40(2):370-378.
dc.relation.referencesThammajaruk P, Inokoshi M, Chong S, Guazzato M. Bonding of composite cements to zirconia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Apr; 80:258-68.
dc.relation.referencesThe Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5S): e1-e105.
dc.relation.referencesTurp V, Akgüngör G, Şen D, Tuncelli̇ B. Influence of MDP content in different resin cements and zirconia primers on Ceramic-Resin cement bond strength. Türkiye Klinikleri Dishekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):7–13.
dc.relation.referencesTzanakakis, E. G. C., Tzoutzas, I. G., & Koidis, P. T. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2016; 115(1), 9-19.
dc.relation.referencesValente F, Mavriqi L, Traini T. Efects of 10-MDP based primer on shear bond strength between zirconia and new experimental resin cement. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(1):235.
dc.relation.referencesVan Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34.
dc.relation.referencesVohra F, Altwaim M, Alshuwaier A, Alomayri A, Al Deeb M, AlFawaz Y, Alrabiah M, Ahdal K, Deeb L, Abduljabbar T. Bond integrity and microleakage of dentin-bonded crowns cemented with bioactive cement in comparison to resin cements: in vitro study J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2020
dc.relation.referencesXie H, Tay FR, Zhang F, Lu Y, Shen S, Chen C. Coupling of 10-methacryloyloxydecyldihydrogenphosphate to tetragonal zirconia: Effect of pH reaction conditions on coordinate bonding. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):e218-25.
dc.relation.referencesYagawa S, Komine F, Fushiki R, Kubochi K, Kimura F, Matsumura H. Effect of priming agents on shear bond strengths of resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material. J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Apr;62(2):204-209.
dc.relation.referencesYang L, Chen B, Xie H, Chen Y, Chen Y, Chen C. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia using products containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(4):279-87
dc.relation.referencesZhang X, Liang W, Jiang F, et al. Effects of air-abrasion pressure on mechanical and bonding properties of translucent zirconia. Clin OralInvestig. 2021;25(4):1979-1988.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalen
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectZirconio
dc.subjectResistencia adhesiva
dc.subject10-MDP
dc.subjectCementos bioactivos
dc.subjectAgentes de unión
dc.subject.keywordsZirconium
dc.subject.keywordsAdhesive resistance
dc.subject.keywords10-MDP
dc.subject.keywordsBioactive cements
dc.subject.keywordsBonding agents
dc.subject.nlmWU 500
dc.titleFuerza adhesiva entre el zirconio y cementos-adhesivos bioactivos y/o con MDP - con y sin previo acondicionamiento dela superficie con arenado. Fase 1
dc.title.translatedAdhesive strength between zirconium and bioactive adhesive cements and MDP – with and without previous sanding surface. Phase 1
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Especializaciónspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Trabajo de grado
Tamaño:
1.58 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Carta de autorizacion.pdf
Tamaño:
307.69 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.95 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Anexo 1 Acta de aprobacion.pdf
Tamaño:
129.56 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Anexo 2 Formato Biblioteca.pdf
Tamaño:
875.65 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Especialización en Prostodoncia