Hacia una revisión del modelo tradicional de cambio teórico: coexistencia entre física cuántica y relatividad general

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCórdoba, Mariana
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:07:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:07:46Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01
dc.description.abstractEn la filosofía de la ciencia del siglo XX tuvo lugar un aguerrido debate entre realistas científicos y antirrealistas, en el que se ha prestado especial atención a la cuestión del cambio teórico. En el presente trabajo argumentaremos que la imagen lineal de cambio teórico, como sucesión por reemplazo de teorías, sobre la cual se monta aquel debate, es un modelo demasiado simplificado. En efecto, no puede dar cuenta del caso de bifurcación teórica, que conduce a la convivencia entre teorías científicas consideradas fundamentales pero incompatibles entre sí, como es el caso de física cuántica y relatividad general.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishIn the strong debate in the philosophy of science of the 20th century between scientific realists and anti-realists, the issue of theoretical change was particularly considered. In this work, I will argue that the lineal picture of theoretic change as succession by replacement, on which that debate is based, is an oversimplified model. In fact, it cannot account for the case of theory bifurcation, which leads to the coexis-tence of supposedly fundamental but incompatible theories, as the case of quantum physics and general relativity.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1694
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6284
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 24, 2012, 47-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesAiello, M., Castagnino, M. & Lombardi, O. “The arrow of time: from universe timeasymmetry to local irreversible processes”. Foundations of Physics 38 (2008): 257-292.spa
dc.relation.referencesAuyang, S. How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorn, M. The Born-Einstein Letters, London: Macmillan, 1969.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, H. & Harré, R., eds. Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.spa
dc.relation.referencesBunge, M. “Sobre Thomas Kuhn y teorías incompatibles”. Exactamente, 47 (2011): 46.spa
dc.relation.referencesButterfield, J. & Isham, C. “On the emergence of time in quantum gravity”. J. Butterfield, ed. The Arguments of Time. Oxford: British Academy - Oxford University Press, 1999, 111-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastagnino, M. & Lombardi, O., “Time asymmetry as universe asymmetry”. O. Descalzi, J. Martínez y S. Rica, eds. Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Structures IX. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, 11-15.—. “The generic nature of the global and non-entropic arrow of time and the double role of the energy-momentum tensor”. Journal of Physics A (Math-ematical and General) 37 (2004a): 4445-4463.—. “The global non-entropic arrow of time: from global geometrical asym-metry to local energy flow”. Synthese 169 (2009): 1-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastagnino, M., Lombardi, O. & Lara, L. (2003), “The global arrow of time as a geometrical property of the universe”. Foundations of Physics 33: 877-912.spa
dc.relation.referencesCórdoba, M. & Lombardi. O. “Realismo y referencia: hacia un enfoque sincrónico desde la práctica científica”. Diálogos 92 (2012), en prensa.spa
dc.relation.referencesEarman, J. A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986.spa
dc.relation.referencesEarman, J. & Norton, J.“What price spacetime substantivalism”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1987): 515-525.spa
dc.relation.referencesEinstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. “Can quantum-mechanical descrip-tion of physical reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780.spa
dc.relation.referencesFeyerabend, P. K. “Explanation, reduction, and empiricism”. H. Feigl y G. Maxwell, eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1962, 28-97. Reimpreso en Realism, Rationalism & Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.spa
dc.relation.referencesHawking, S. & Ellis, G. The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.spa
dc.relation.referencesHughes, R. I. G. The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsham, C. J. “Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time”. L. A. Ibort y M. A. Rodríguez, eds. Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum FieldTheories, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993, 157-288.spa
dc.relation.referencesJammer, M. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.spa
dc.relation.referencesJames, W. “The dilemma of determinism”. The Will to Believe, New York: Dover Publications, [1897] 1956.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuchař, K. “The problem of time in canonical quantization”. A. Ashtekar y J. Stachel, eds. Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Boston: Birkhäuser, 1991, 141-171.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2ª. ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoewer, B. “Copenhagen versus Bohmian interpretations of quantum theory”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1998): 317-331.spa
dc.relation.referencesNagel E. The Structure of Science. New York: Hartcourt, Brace & World, 1961.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiiniluoto, I. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesPopper, K. Logik der Forschung. Viena: Springer Verlag, 1934. Versión inglesa: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Londres: Hutchinson, 1959.spa
dc.relation.referencesPsillos, S. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. New York-London: Routledge, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchutz, B. Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.spa
dc.relation.referencesSklar, L. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley - Los Angeles - Londres: Univer-sity of California Press, 1974.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1694
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectFísica cuánticaspa
dc.subjectRelatividad generalspa
dc.subjectBifurcación teóricaspa
dc.subject.keywordsQuantum Physicsspa
dc.subject.keywordsGeneral Relativityspa
dc.subject.keywordsTheory Bifurcationspa
dc.titleHacia una revisión del modelo tradicional de cambio teórico: coexistencia entre física cuántica y relatividad generalspa
dc.title.translatedTowards a review of the theory change traditional model: coexistence between quantum physics and general relativityspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2012.jpg
Tamaño:
84.27 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia