Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A Consensus Report From the AAP regeneration workshop

dc.contributor.authorTatakis, Dimitris N.
dc.contributor.authorChambrone, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Edward P.
dc.contributor.authorLanger, Burton
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Michael K.
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Christopher R.
dc.contributor.authorZabalegui, Ion
dc.contributor.authorZadeh, Homayoun H.
dc.contributor.orcidChambrone, Leandro [0000-0002-2838-1015]
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T17:26:41Z
dc.date.available2020-11-23T17:26:41Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractenglishManagement of gingival recession defects, a common periodontal condition, using root coverage procedures is an important aspect of periodontal regenerative therapy. The goal of the periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures group was to develop a consensus report based on the accompanying systematic review of root coverage procedures, including priorities for future research and identification of the best evidence available to manage different clinical scenarios. The group reviewed and discussed the accompanying systematic review, which covered treatment of single-tooth recession defects, multiple-tooth recession defects, and additional focused questions on relevant clinical topics. The consensus group members submitted additional material for consideration by the group in advance and at the time of the meeting. The group also identified priorities for future research. All reviewed root coverage procedures provide significant reduction in recession depth, especially for Miller Class I and II recession defects. Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedures provide the best root coverage outcomes. Acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) or enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in conjunction with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) can serve as alternatives to autogenous donor tissue. Additional research is needed to do the following: 1) assess the treatment outcomes for multiple-tooth recession defects, oral sites other than maxillary canine and premolar teeth, and Miller Class III and IV defects; 2) assess the role of patient- and site-specific factors on procedure outcomes; and 3) obtain evidence on patient-reported outcomes. Predictable root coverage is possible for single-tooth and multiple-tooth recession defects, with SCTG procedures providing the best root coverage outcomes. Alternatives to SCTG are supported by evidence of varying strength. Additional research is needed on treatment outcomes for specific oral sites. Clinical Recommendation: For Miller Class I and II single-tooth recession defects, SCTG procedures provide the best outcomes, whereas ADMG or EMD in conjunction with CAF may be used as an alternative.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140376
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn1943-367
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5115
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWileyspa
dc.publisher.journalJournal of Periodontologyspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Periodontology, 1943-367, Vol. 86, Supl. 2, 2015, p. S52-S55spa
dc.relation.urihttps://aap.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1902/jop.2015.140376
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightsAcceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons2015
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.subject.keywordsGingiva, surgeryspa
dc.subject.keywordsGingival recessionspa
dc.subject.keywordsGuided tissue regenerationspa
dc.subject.keywordsPeriodontalspa
dc.subject.keywordsSurgical flapsspa
dc.subject.keywordsTissue engineeringspa
dc.subject.keywordsTransplantationspa
dc.subject.keywordsAutologousspa
dc.titlePeriodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A Consensus Report From the AAP regeneration workshopspa
dc.title.translatedPeriodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A Consensus Report From the AAP regeneration workshopspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revista

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Tatakis_Dimitris_N._2015.pdf
Tamaño:
434.65 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Colecciones