La formación de individuos biológicos: argumentos para un pluralismo epistémico

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Cárdenas, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5789-0380
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:25:51Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:25:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractLa biología divide la naturaleza en una pluralidad de entidades individuales (como ge-nes, células, virus, organismos, especies). El llamado problema de la individualidad bio-lógica puede definirse por dos preguntas centrales. Una pregunta empírica destinada a explicar cómo y por qué una colección de entidades biológicas puede conformar un individuo y una pregunta ontológica que busca responder qué es un individuo biológico en general. En esta investigación abordaré la pregunta empírica desde una aproximación pluralista y epistémica. Argumentaré que la diversidad de criterios y prácticas utilizados por la biología para individuar la naturaleza no es un estado transitorio de la investiga-ción científica y debería conservarse.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishBiology divides nature into a plurality of individual entities (e.g., genes, cells, viruses, organisms, species). The so-called problem of biological individuality can be defined by two central questions. An empirical question that asks how and why a set of biological entities can constitute an individual, and an ontological question that asks what a bi-ological individual is in general. In this research I will focus on the empirical question from a pluralistic and epistemic approach. I will argue that the diversity of criteria and practices used by biology to individuate nature is not a transitory state of scientific research, and should be preserved.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3502
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6307
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 21 Núm 42, 2021, 149-174.spa
dc.relation.referencesAllendorf, Fred y Gordon Luikart. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Ho-boken: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesBedau, Mark A. y Carol E. Cleland. The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouchard, Frédéric y Philippe Huneman. From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. Cambridge: mit Press, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrigandt, Ingo. “Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Ex-planatory Integration in Biology”. Erkenntnis 73.3 (2010): 295-311. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9233-3>spa
dc.relation.referencesBuss, Leo W. The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarthey, Alexandra J. R. et ál. “Conserving the Holobiont”. Functional Ecology 34.4 (2020): 764-776. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13504>spa
dc.relation.referencesChang, Hasok. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesCheung, Tobias. “What Is an ‘Organism’? On the Occurrence of a New Term and its Conceptual Transformations 1680-1850”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32.2-3 (2010): 155-194.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoates, David J. et ál. “Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing with the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics”. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6.165 (2018). <https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00165>spa
dc.relation.referencesDawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.spa
dc.relation.referencesEreshefsky, Mark. “Eliminative Pluralism”. Philosophy of Science 59.4 (1992): 671-690. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/289701>spa
dc.relation.referencesGhiselin, Michael T. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem”. Systematic Zoology23.4 (1974): 536-544. <https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2412471>spa
dc.relation.referencesGould, Stephen Jay. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.spa
dc.relation.referencesHacking, Ian. “The Disunities of the Sciences”. The Disunity of Science. Bounda-ries, Contexts, and Power. Eds. Peter Galison y David J. Stump. California: Stanford University Press, 1996. 37-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesHempel, Carl y Paul Oppenheim. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”. Philosophy of Science 15.2 (1948): 135-175.spa
dc.relation.referencesHölldobler, Bert y Edward O. Wilson. The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesHughes, Kevin A. et ál. “Protection of Antarctic Microbial Communities – ‘out of Sight, out of Mind’ ”. Frontiers in Microbiology 6.151 (2015). <https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00151>spa
dc.relation.referencesKitcher, Philip. “Gene: Current Usages”. Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Eds. Evelyn Fox Keller y Elisabeth A. Lloyd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. 128-131.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrakauer, David et ál. “The Information Theory of Individuality”. Theory in Bioscien-ces 139.2 (2020): 209-223. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-020-00313-7>spa
dc.relation.referencesKüppers, Bernd-Olaf. Information and the Origin of Life. Cambridge: mit Press, 1990.Lahav, Noam. Biogenesis: Theories of Life's Origin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesLidgard, Scott y Lynn K. Nyhart. “The Work of Biological Individuality: Concepts and Contexts”. Biological Individuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. 17-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesLosos, Jonathan B. Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, and the Future of Evolution. New York: Riverhead Books, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesLove, Alan C. y Ingo Brigandt. “Philosophical Dimensions of Individuality”. Biolo-gical Individuality. Eds. Scott Lidgard y Lynn K. Nyhart. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. 318-348.spa
dc.relation.referencesMora, Camilo et ál. “How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?” plosBiology 9.8 (2011): e1001127. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127>spa
dc.relation.referencesNational Research Council Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Func-tional, Applications. “The National Academies Collection: Reports Funded by National Institutes of Health”. The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet, National Academies Press (us). National Academy of Sciences, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiklas, Karl J. y Stuart A. Newman. Multicellularity. Origins and Evolution. Cambri-dge: mit Press, 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesPepper, John W. y Matthew D. Herron. “Does Biology Need an Organism Con-cept?” Biological Reviews 83 (2008): 621-627. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00057.x>spa
dc.relation.referencesPradeu, Thomas et ál. “Understanding Viruses: Philosophical Investigations”. Stu-dies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philo-sophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 59.1 (2016): 57-63. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.008>spa
dc.relation.referencesQueller, David C. y Joan E. Strassmann. “Beyond Society: The Evolution of Orga-nismality”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences364.1533 (2009): 3143-55. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0095>spa
dc.relation.referencesRedford, Kent H., et ál. “Conservation and the Microbiome”. Conservation Biology: the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 26.2 (2012): 195-197. <ht-tps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01829.x>spa
dc.relation.referencesRobert, Jason Scott. “Evo-devo”. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Ed. Michael Ruse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 291-309.spa
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Protocolo de Cartagena sobre seguridad de la biotecnología del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Mon-treal: Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica, 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesShannon, Claude E. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”. The Bell System Technical Journal 27.3 (1948): 379-423.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, John y Eors Szathmary. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrassmann, Joan E. y David C. Queller. “The Social Organism: Congresses, Parties, and Committees”. Evolution 64.3 (2010): 605-16. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00929.x>spa
dc.relation.referencesTrevelline, Brian K. et ál. “Conservation Biology Needs a Microbial Renaissance: a Call for the Consideration of Host-Associated Microbiota in Wildlife Ma-nagement Practices”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286, 1895 (2019): 20182448. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2448>spa
dc.relation.referencesUmen, James G. “Green Algae and the Origins of Multicellularity in the Plant King-dom”. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in Biology 6.11 (2014): a016170. <ht-tps://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016170>spa
dc.relation.referencesWaters, C. Kenneth. “Ask not ‘What Is an Individual?’ ” Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices. Eds. Otavio Bueno, Ruey-Lin Chen y Melinda Bonnie Fagan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 91-113.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, David Sloan y Elliott Sober. “Reviving the Superorganism”. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136.3 (1989): 337-356. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80169-9>spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3502
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectIndividualidad biológicaspa
dc.subjectOrganismosspa
dc.subjectPluralismo epistémicospa
dc.subjectPregunta empíricaspa
dc.subjectMonismospa
dc.subjectPregunta ontológicaspa
dc.subjectRepresentación científicaspa
dc.subject.keywordsBiological individualityspa
dc.subject.keywordsOrganismsspa
dc.subject.keywordsEpistemic pluralismspa
dc.subject.keywordsEmpirical questionspa
dc.subject.keywordsMonismspa
dc.subject.keywordsOntological questionspa
dc.subject.keywordsScientific representationspa
dc.titleLa formación de individuos biológicos: argumentos para un pluralismo epistémicospa
dc.title.translatedThe Formation of Biological Individuals:Arguments for an Epistemic Pluralismspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2021.jpg
Tamaño:
50.65 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia