La relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hund

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorFortín, Sebastían
dc.contributor.authorMartínez González, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4531-7461
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7239-1763
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:03:49Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:03:49Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.description.abstractEn el presente trabajo abordamos el problema de la relación entre química y física focalizándonos en la cuestión del isomerismo óptico y la llamada ‘paradoja de Hund’, que apunta a la dificultad de dar cuenta de la quiralidad mediante la mecánica cuántica. En particular, presentamos la solución a la paradoja propuesta desde la teoría de la decoherencia. El objetivo del trabajo consiste en cuestionar esta solución a la luz de una interpretación precisa del concepto de decoherencia. Sobre esta base argumentamos que una respuesta satisfactoria a la paradoja de Hund sólo puede brindarse desde una adecuada interpretación de la mecánica cuántica, que logre sortear los desafíos conceptuales de la teoría.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishIn this article we address the problem of the relationship between chemistry and physics by focusing on the issue of optical isomerism and the so-called ‘Hund’s paradox’, which points to the difficulty of giving an account of quirality by means of quantum mecha-nics. In particular, we introduce the solution to the paradox as proposed by the theory of decoherence. The main goal of this work consists in disputing that solution in the light of a precise interpretation of the concept of decoherence. On this basis, we argue that a satisfactory answer to Hund’s paradox can only be supplied from an adequate interpretation of quantum mechanics, which can overcome the conceptual challenges of the theory.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1649
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.issn0124-4620
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6275
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.journalRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 13 Núm 26, 2013, 199-224.spa
dc.relation.referencesAdler, S. “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P. W. Anderson”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003): 135-142.spa
dc.relation.referencesArdenghi, J. S., Fortin, S. & Lombardi, O. “The conceptual meaning of reduced states: decoherence and interpretation”. 14th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Nancy, 2011spa
dc.relation.referencesBacciagaluppi, G. “The role of decoherence in quantum mechanics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. 2008. <https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2008/entries/qm-decoherence/>.spa
dc.relation.referencesBacciagaluppi, G. & Hemmo, M. “Making sense of approximate decohe-rence”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 345-354.—.. “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (1996): 239-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesBader, R. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994spa
dc.relation.referencesBallentine, L. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development. Singapore: World S cient i fic , 1998spa
dc.relation.referencesBerlin, Y. A., Burin, A. L. & Goldanskii, V. V. “The Hund paradox and stabilization of molecular chiral states”. Zeitschrift für Physik D 37 (1996): 333-339.spa
dc.relation.referencesBub, J. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesD’Espagnat, B. “An elementary note about mixtures”. Preludes in Theore-tical Physics. Eds. A. De-Shalit, H. Feshbach & L. van Hove. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966.spa
dc.relation.referencesD’Espagnat, B. Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, MA: Benjamin, 1976.spa
dc.relation.referencesDirac, P. A. M. “Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 123 (1929): 714-33spa
dc.relation.referencesElby, A. “The ‘decoherence’ approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philo-sophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 355-365.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarris, R. A. & Stodolsky, L. “Time dependence of optical activity”. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 74 (1981): 2145-2155.spa
dc.relation.referencesHealey, R. A. “Dissipating the quantum measurement problem”. Topoi 14 (1995): 55-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeisenberg, W. “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mecha-n i c s”. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Eds. J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983. Trad. de “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer Kinematic und Mechanik”. Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (1927 ): 172 -198.spa
dc.relation.referencesHendry, R. F. “The physicists, the chemists, and the pragmatics of explana-t i on”. Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 1048-59.—. “Two conceptions of the chemical bond”. Philosophy of Science 75 (2008): 909-920.—. “Ontological reduction and molecular structure”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 183-191.spa
dc.relation.referencesHettema, H. “Explanation and theory foundation in quantum chemistry”. Foundatios of Chemistry 11 (2009): 145-174.—.Reducing Chemistry to Physics. Limits, Models, Consecuences. Groningen: University of Groningen, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesHund. F. “Zur Deutung der Molekelspektren. III”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, (1927) 805-826.spa
dc.relation.referencesJoos, E. “Elements of environmental decoherence”. Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 538. Eds. P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer & I. O. Stamatescu. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, (2000).spa
dc.relation.referencesLandau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Mecánica Cuántica No-Relativista. Barce-lona: Reverté, 1972spa
dc.relation.referencesLeggett, A. J. “Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox”. Quantum Implications. Eds. B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat. Londres: Routledge and Kegan P a u l , 19 8 7spa
dc.relation.referencesLombardi, O & Castagnino, M. “A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics39 (2008a): 380-443.—. “The role of the Hamiltonian in the interpretation of quantum mecha-n i c s”. Journal of Physics. Conferences Series. 2008b, # 012014. Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 28.—. “Matters are not so clear on the physical side”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 159-166spa
dc.relation.referencesLombardi, O., Fortin, S., Castagnino M. & Ardenghi, J. S. “Compatibility between environment-induced decoherence and the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics”. Philosophy of Science 78 (2011): 1024-1036spa
dc.relation.referencesombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical w or ld ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148.—. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Ne e d h a m”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesNagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. “Environment-induced decoherence and the tran-sition from quantum to classical”. Fundamentals of Quantum Information. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 587. Ed. D. Heiss. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002. (los números de página está tomados de arXiv:quant-ph/0010011).spa
dc.relation.referencesPrimas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer, 1983spa
dc.relation.referencesScerri, E. R. “Realism, reduction and the ‘intermediate position”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.—. “Just how ab initio is ab initio quantum chemistry?”. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (2004): 93-116.—. “Normative and descriptive philosophy of science and the role of chemistry”. Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline. Eds. D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. 119-128. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 242.—. “Editorial 37”. Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2011): 1-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesScerri, E. R. & McIntyre, L. “The case for the philosophy of chemistry”. Synthese 111 (19 9 7 ): 213 -232spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlosshauer, M. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin: Springer, 2007.spa
dc.relation.referencesSutcliffe, B. T. & Wolley, R. G. “A comment on Editorial 37”. Foundations of Chemistry, 13 (2011): 93-95.—.. “Atoms and molecules in classical chemistry and quantum mechanics”. Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Vol. 6, Philosophy of Chemistry. Eds. R. F. Hendry & A Woody. Oxford: Elsevier, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzabo, A & Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1996spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Brakel, J. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesVemulapalli, G. K. & Byerly, H. “Remnants of reductionism”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 17-41.spa
dc.relation.referencesWolley, R. G. “Quantum theory and molecular structure”. Advances in Physics25 (1976): 27-52.—. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. Journal of the American Chemical Society100 (1978): 1073-1078.—. “Is there a quantum definition of a molecule?”. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 23 (1998): 3-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesZurek, W. H. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?”. Physical Review D 24 (1981): 1516-1525.—. “Environment-induced superselection rules”. Physical Review D 26 (1982): 1862-1880.—. “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”. Physics Today44 (1991): 36-44.—. “Preferred states, predictability, classicality and the environment-induced decoherence”. Progress of Theoretical Physics 89 (1993): 281-312.—. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (2003): 715-776.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1649
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessrightshttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectIsomerismospa
dc.subjectQuiralidadspa
dc.subjectParadoja de Hundspa
dc.subjectDecoherenciaspa
dc.subjectInterpretación de la mecánica cuánticaspa
dc.subject.keywordsIsomerismspa
dc.subject.keywordsQuiralityspa
dc.subject.keywordsHund’s paradoxspa
dc.subject.keywordsDecoherencespa
dc.subject.keywordsInterpretation of quantum mechanicsspa
dc.titleLa relación entre química y física: isomerismo óptico y la paradoja de Hundspa
dc.title.translatedThe relationship between Chemistry and physics: optical isomerismand Hund’s paradoxspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RCFC2013.jpg
Tamaño:
124.16 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia