A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)

View/ Open
Share this
Author
Chesnut, Randall
Aguilera, Sergio
Buki, Andras
Bulger, Eileen
Citerio, Giuseppe
Cooper, D. Jamie
Diaz Arrastia, Ramon
Diringer, Michael
Figaji, Anthony
Gao, Guoyi
Geocadin, Romer
Ghajar, Jamshid
Harris, Odette
Hoffer, Alan
Hutchinson, Peter
Joseph, Mathew
Kitagawa, Ryan
Manley, Geoffrey
Mayer, Stephan
Menon, David K.
Meyfroidt, Geert
Michael, Daniel B.
Oddo, Mauro
Okonkwo, David
Patel, Mayur
Robertson, Claudia
Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
Sahuquillo, Juan
Servadei, Franco
Shutter, Lori
Stein, Deborah
Stocchetti, Nino
Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Timmons, Shelly
Tsai, Eve
Ullman, Jamie S.
Vespa, Paul
Videtta, Walter
Wright, David W.
Zammit, Christopher
Hawryluk, Gregory W. J.
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, 1432-1238, Vol. 46, Nro. 5, 2020 p. 919-929
Published for
Springer Link
Source's URL
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-019-05900-xhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Citación
Metadata
Show full item record
Documents PDF
Abstract
Current guidelines for the treatment of adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) consist of high-quality evidence reports, but they are no longer accompanied by management protocols, as these require expert opinion to bridge the gap between published evidence and patient care. We aimed to establish a modern sTBI protocol for adult patients with both intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain oxygen monitors in place.
Our consensus working group consisted of 42 experienced and actively practicing sTBI opinion leaders from six continents. Having previously established a protocol for the treatment of patients with ICP monitoring alone, we addressed patients who have a brain oxygen monitor in addition to an ICP monitor. The management protocols were developed through a Delphi-method-based consensus approach and were finalized at an in-person meeting.
We established three distinct treatment protocols, each with three tiers whereby higher tiers involve therapies with higher risk. One protocol addresses the management of ICP elevation when brain oxygenation is normal. A second addresses management of brain hypoxia with normal ICP. The third protocol addresses the situation when both intracranial hypertension and brain hypoxia are present. The panel considered issues pertaining to blood transfusion and ventilator management when designing the different algorithms.
These protocols are intended to assist clinicians in the management of patients with both ICP and brain oxygen monitors but they do not reflect either a standard-of-care or a substitute for thoughtful individualized management. These protocols should be used in conjunction with recommendations for basic care, management of critical neuroworsening and weaning treatment recently published in conjunction with the Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference.
Keywords
Collections
- Artículos [1715]