Logotipo del repositorio

The Temporal Dimension of Objects and Structural Realism

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorCastrejón, Gilberto
dc.date2024-12-28
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-22T21:28:06Z
dc.date.available2025-08-22T21:28:06Z
dc.descriptionThe article deals with the ontology of time in the theory of relativity, in relation to the temporal nature of objects. This is an aspect not explicitly addressed by structural realism in its version called “moderate structural realism”, which places objects and structures in the same ontological status. Thus, it is shown that in such a position there is a tension that is played around the temporal ontology of objects. That said, structural realism, given the argumentative stage in which it finds itself, is unable to muster sufficient arguments to account for this tension.en-US
dc.descriptionEl artículo trata sobre la ontología del tiempo en la teoría de la relatividad con relación al carácter temporal de los objetos. Este aspecto no es tratado explícitamente por el realismo estructural en su versión denominada “realismo estructural moderado” que ubica a los objetos y a las estructuras en el mismo estatus ontológico. Así, se muestra que en tal postura existe una tensión que se juega alrededor de la ontología temporal de los objetos y que dicho realismo estructural, dado el estadio argumentativo en el que se encuentra, no logra conjugar los argumentos suficientes para dar cuenta de dicha tensión.es-ES
dc.descriptionEste artigo trata da ontologia do tempo na teoria da relatividade com relação ao caráter temporal dos objetos. Esse aspecto não é explicitamente tratado pelo realismo estrutural em sua versão chamada “realismo estrutural moderado”, que coloca objetos e estruturas no mesmo status ontológico. Assim, mostra-se que em tal posição há uma tensão que se desenvolve em torno da ontologia temporal dos objetos e que o realismo estrutural, dado o estágio argumentativo em que se encontra, não consegue conjugar argumentos suficientes para explicar essa tensão.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/4059
dc.identifier10.18270/rcfc.4059
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/17317
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/4059/3732
dc.relation/*ref*/Alvarado Marambio, José Tomás. “Esencias individuales e identidad primitiva”. ANALYTICA 11.2 (2007): 155-195. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.35920/arf.v11i2.533>
dc.relation/*ref*/Balashov, Yuri. “Relativistic Objects”. Noûs 33.4 (1999): 644-662. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00198>
dc.relation/*ref*/_____. “Persistence”. The Oxford Handbook of Time. Ed. Craig Callender. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 13-40.
dc.relation/*ref*/Brading, Katherine y Castellani, Elena (eds.). Symmetries in Physics. Philisophical Reflections. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
dc.relation/*ref*/Brighouse, C. “Spacetime and Holes”. Proceedings of the 1994 biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1.1. Eds. D. Hull, M. Forbes and R.M. Burian. Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1994, 117–125. DOI: <https://www.doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.1.193017>
dc.relation/*ref*/Callender, Craig ed. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298204.001.0001>
dc.relation/*ref*/Calvo Vélez, David. “Crítica del isomorfismo de los modelos estructuralistas”. Teorema 24.3 (2006): 57-72. <https://philarchive.org/rec/CALCDI>
dc.relation/*ref*/Cao, Tian Yu. “Can We Dissolve Physical Entities into Mathematical Structures?” Synthese 136.1 (2003): 57-71. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20117387>
dc.relation/*ref*/Castrejón, Gilberto. “Sobre el estatus ontológico del espaciotiempo. Una respuesta al realismo estructural”. Rev. Colomb. Filos. Cienc. 19.39 (2019a): 43-84. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v19i39.2803>
dc.relation/*ref*/______. “La idealidad del tiempo, Gödel y la relatividad”. Revista de Estudios Kantianos 4.2 (2019b): 293-318. DOI: <https://www.doi.org/10.7203/REK.4.2.13825>
dc.relation/*ref*/Chakravartty, Anja. “The Structuralist Conception of Objects”. Philosophy of Science 70.5 (2003): 867-878. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1086/377373>
dc.relation/*ref*/Dainton, Barry. Time and Space. U.K.: McGill Queen’s University Press, 2010. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654437>
dc.relation/*ref*/Dorato, Mauro. “Substantivalism, Relacionism and Structural Spacetime Realism”. Foundations of Physics 30 (2000): 1605-1628. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026442015519>
dc.relation/*ref*/_____. “Is Structural Spacetime Realism Relationism in Disguise? The Supererogatory Nature of the substantivalism/Relationism Debate”. The Ontology of Spacetime II. Ed. Dennis Dieks. The Netherlands: Elsiever, 2006: 17-38. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1871-1774(08)00002-8>
dc.relation/*ref*/Earman, John. “The Implications of General Covariance for the Ontology and Ideology of Spacetime”. The Ontology of Spacetime. Ed. Dennis Dieks. The Netherlands: Elsiever, 2006: 3-23. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1871-1774(06)01001-1>
dc.relation/*ref*/Earman, John and Norton, John. “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Argument”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4.38 (1987): 515. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/687356>
dc.relation/*ref*/Esfeld, Michael. “Metaphysics of Science Between Metaphysics and Science”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (2007): 199–213. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204651_011>
dc.relation/*ref*/Esfeld, Michael y Lam, Vincent. “Moderate Structural Realism About Spactime”. Synthese 160 (2008): 27-46. <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-006-9076-2>
dc.relation/*ref*/Gödel, Kurt. Obras completas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2006.
dc.relation/*ref*/Golosz, Jerzy. “Presentism and the Flow of Time”. Axiomathes 27.1 (2016): 1-10. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9305-3>
dc.relation/*ref*/Greene, Brian. El tejido del cosmos: Espacio, tiempo y la textura de la realidad. Ser. Barcelona: Crítica, 2006.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gwinner, G. “Experimental Tests of Time Dilation in Special Relativity”. Modern Physics Letters A 20.11 (2005): 791-806. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732305017202>
dc.relation/*ref*/Haslanger, Sally and Kurtz, Roxanne Marie. Persistence. Contemporary Readings. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hacyan, Shahen. “Geometry as an Object of Experience: Kant and the Missed Debate Between Poincaré and Einstein”. European Journal of Physics 30 (2007): 337-350. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0712.2222>
dc.relation/*ref*/_____. Relatividad para estudiantes de física. México: F.C.E., 2013.
dc.relation/*ref*/Heller, Mark. The Ontology of Physical Objects: Four-Dimensional Hunks of Matter. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, 1990. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166409>
dc.relation/*ref*/Hoefer, Carl. “The Metaphysics of Spacetime Substantivalism”. Journal of Philosophy 93 (1996): 5-27. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.2307/2941016>
dc.relation/*ref*/Ladyman, James. “What is structural realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29.3 (1998): 409-424. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5>
dc.relation/*ref*/Ladyman, James, et ál. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001>
dc.relation/*ref*/Lam, Vincent y Esfeld, Michael. “The Structural Metaphysics of Quantum Theory and General Relativity”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (2012): 243–258. DOI: DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-012-9197-x>
dc.relation/*ref*/Lam, Vincent y Wüthrich, Christian. “No Categorial Support for Radical Ontic Structural Realism”. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 66 (2015): 605-634. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt053>
dc.relation/*ref*/Lewis, David. Sobre la pluralidad de mundos. México: UNAM/IIF, 2013.
dc.relation/*ref*/López, Cristian, “Identidad, tiempo y cambio: disolviendo el problema de la identidad diacrónica”. Rev. Colomb. Filos. Cienc. 18.38 (2019): 119-159. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v19i38.2408>
dc.relation/*ref*/Madrid-Casado, C. “Do Mathematical Models Represent the World? The Case of Quantum Mathematical Models”. Nature and Life. Philosophical Essays and Physics and Biology. Ed. J. L. González Recio. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2009. 67-89. <https://philpapers.org/rec/maddmm>
dc.relation/*ref*/Markosian, Nick, “Time”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter Edition, 2010. Recuperado de: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/ entries/time/.
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, Kristie. “The Metaphysical Equivalence of Three and Four Dimensionalism”. Erkenntnis 62.1 (2005): 91-117. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-004-2845-8>
dc.relation/*ref*/Nerlich, Graham. “Holes in the Hole Argument”. What spacetime explains? New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 206-24.
dc.relation/*ref*/Oaklander, L. Nathan. The Ontology of Time. New York: Prometheus Books, 2004.
dc.relation/*ref*/Parsons, Josh. “Must a Four Dimensionalist Believe in Temporal Parts?”. Monist 83.3 (2000): 399- 418. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.5840/monist200083319>
dc.relation/*ref*/Psillos, Stathis. “Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 49.1 (1995): 15-46. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1995.tb00113.x>
dc.relation/*ref*/_____. “Is Structural Realism Posible?” Philosophy of Science 68.3 (2001): 513-524. DOI: <https://www.doi.org/10.1086/392894>
dc.relation/*ref*/Rickles, Dean. Symmetry, Structure and Spacetime. The Netherlands: Elsiever, 2008.
dc.relation/*ref*/Redhead, Michael. “The Interpretation of Gauge Symmetry”. Symmetries in Physics. Philosophical Reflections. Eds. K. Brading and E. Castellani. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 124-139. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535369.008>
dc.relation/*ref*/Rivadulla, Andrés. “Two Dogmas of Structural Realism. A Confirmation of Philosophical Death Foretold”. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 42.124 (2010): 3-29. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2010.890>
dc.relation/*ref*/Sider, Theodore. “Four Dimensionalism”. Philosophical Review 106.2 (1997): 197-231. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.2307/2998357>
dc.relation/*ref*/_____. Four-Dimensionalism. An Ontology of Persistence and Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2005.10819873>
dc.relation/*ref*/Stachel, John. “The Meaning of General Covariance”. Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays of the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Eds. John Earman et ál. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993, 129-162.
dc.relation/*ref*/Stachel, John and Iftime, M. Lichnerowicz.“Espaces Fibres et Espace-Temps”. General Relativity and Gravitation 1.3 (2005): 235-245. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759535>
dc.relation/*ref*/Utiyama, Ruy. “Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interation”. Physical Review 101.5 (1956): 1597-1607. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.101.1597>
dc.relation/*ref*/van Fraassen, B. C. “Structure: Its Shadow and Substance”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57.2 (2006): 275-307. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axl002>
dc.relation/*ref*/Wang, Hao, “Time in Philosophy and in Physics from Kant and Einstein to Gödel”. Synthese 102.2 (1995): 215-234. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089801>
dc.relation/*ref*/Wald, Robert M. General Relativity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984.
dc.relation/*ref*/Will, C. M. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
dc.relation/*ref*/Worral, John. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds”. Dialectica 43.1-2 (1989): 99-124. DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x>
dc.relation/*ref*/Yourgrau, Paul. Un mundo sin tiempo. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores, 2007.
dc.relation/*ref*/Zimmerman, Dean W., “Persistence and Presentism”. Philosophical Papers 25.2 (1996): 115-126. <https://doi.org/10.1080/05568649609506542>
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 24 No. 49 (2024): Dossier on Philosophy of Technology and Artificial Intelligence; 255-292en-US
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 24 Núm. 49 (2024): Dossier sobre filosofía de la tecnología e inteligencia artifical; 255-292es-ES
dc.source2463-1159
dc.source0124-4620
dc.subjectStructural realismen-US
dc.subjectRelativityen-US
dc.subjectTimeen-US
dc.subjectObjectsen-US
dc.subjectDimensionalityen-US
dc.subjectOntologyen-US
dc.subjectStructureen-US
dc.subjectRealismo estructurales-ES
dc.subjectRelatividades-ES
dc.subjectTiempoes-ES
dc.subjectObjetoses-ES
dc.subjectDimensionalidades-ES
dc.subjectOntologíaes-ES
dc.subjectEstructuraes-ES
dc.subjectrealismo estruturalpt-BR
dc.subjectrelatividadept-BR
dc.subjecttempopt-BR
dc.subjectobjetospt-BR
dc.subjectdimensionalidadept-BR
dc.subjectontologiapt-BR
dc.subjectestruturapt-BR
dc.titleThe Temporal Dimension of Objects and Structural Realismen-US
dc.titleLa dimensión temporal de los objetos y el realismo estructurales-ES
dc.titleA dimensão temporal dos objetos e o realismo estruturalpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

7. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia - Cosecha

Software DSpace copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS