Mentes Animales, Hormigas e Inteligencia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorAndrade Perez, Luis Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorEslava Calderón, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T02:52:47Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T02:52:47Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.description.abstractLas hormigas, a menudo pasadas por alto en la jerarquía de la inteligencia animal, despliegan una complejidad sorprendente en su comportamiento colectivo y adaptabilidad al entorno. Aunque su tamaño diminuto y estructura social aparentemente simple pueden sugerir una falta de sofisticación cognitiva, la realidad subyacente desafía estas percepciones convencionales. Este trabajo embarca en la exploración de la inteligencia en las hormigas, buscando argumentar y evidenciar que estos insectos sociales exhiben una forma única de inteligencia que merece una atención más detenida y apreciativa.
dc.description.abstractenglishAnts, often overlooked in the hierarchy of animal intelligence, display surprising complexity in their collective behavior and adaptability to their environment. Although their tiny size and seemingly simple social structure may suggest a lack of cognitive sophistication, the underlying reality challenges these conventional perceptions. This work embarks on the exploration of intelligence in ants, seeking to argue and demonstrate that these social insects exhibit a unique form of intelligence that deserves closer and more appreciative attention.
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/12158
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisher.facultyDepartamento de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad El Bosquespa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Filosofía de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAllen, C. & Trestman, M. (2014 [1995]) “Animal consciousness”, en Zalta, E. N. (ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab [referencia: 18 de febrero de 2015].
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, E., & Arcila Rodríguez, S. (2020). Presentación del número especial: El Pensamiento Biológico de Jakob Von Uexküll. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 20(40), 11-16. DOI: 10.18270/rcfc.v43i21.3797
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, E. (2022). La perspectiva informacional en la filosofía de la naturaleza. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Universidad El Bosque. ISBN: 9789587392562.
dc.relation.referencesBeck, J. (2021). Pensar la Filosofía de la Biología de Comienzos de Siglo XX a Través de Jakob Von Uexküll. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 20(40), 11-16. DOI: 10.18270/rcfc.v43i21.3797
dc.relation.referencesCarruthers, P. (2002). The Cognitive Functions of Language, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25: 657–74.
dc.relation.referencesCarruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought, New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCammaerts, M.-C., & Cammaerts, R. (2016). Ants Can Expect the Time of an Event on Basis of Previous Experiences. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2016, Article ID 9473128, 1-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9473128
dc.relation.referencesCamp, E. (2004). The Generality Constraint and Categorial Restrictions. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 54(215), 209–231.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3542817
dc.relation.referencesCheung, A., et al. (2014). Still no convincing evidence for cognitive map use by honeybees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E4396–E4397.
dc.relation.referencesDi Pietro, V., Govoni, P., Chan, K. H., Oliveira, R. C., Wenseleers, T., & van den Berg, P. (2022). Evolution of self-organised division of labour driven by stigmergy in leaf-cutter ants. Scientific Reports, 12(21971). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26324-6
dc.relation.referencesDennett, D. (1987). The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesDennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
dc.relation.referencesDummett, M. (1993). Seas of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesDoyle, M. J., & Marsh, L. (2013). Stigmergy 3.0: From ants to economies. Cognitive Systems Research, 21, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.06.001
dc.relation.referencesEvans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesFodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press. (p. 153)
dc.relation.referencesFodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGordon, D. (2019). The Ecology of Collective Behavior in Ants. Annual Review of Entomology, 64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111923.
dc.relation.referencesGould, J. L., & Gould, C. G. (2007). Social Intelligence of Wasps and Ants. In Animal Architects: Building and the Evolution of Intelligence (pp. 75-98). Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesGriffin, D. R. (2001). Animal Minds: Beyond Cognition to Consciousness. University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesGriffin, Donald & Speck, Gayle. (2004). New Evidence of Animal Consciousness. Animal cognition. 7. 5-18. 10.1007/s10071-003-0203-x.
dc.relation.referencesHeredia, J. M. (2011). Etología animal, ontología y biopolítica en Jakob von Uexküll. Filosofía de la Historia y Biohistoria, 6(1), 61-78. Recuperado de https://www.abfhib.org/FHB/FHB-06-1/FHB-6-1-05-Juan-Manuel-Heredia.pdf
dc.relation.referencesHeredia, J. M. (2020). Jakob von Uexküll y el problema de los mundos (circundantes) humanos. Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, (25), 167-186. Recuperado de https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/contrastes/article/view/8576/12826
dc.relation.referencesHoerl, C., & McCormack, T. (2018). Animal minds in time. In The Routledge Handbook of Animal Minds (pp. 56). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesHölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. Norton & Company.
dc.relation.referencesHumphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. En P. P. G. Bateson y R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 303–317). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesJackson, D., & Ratnieks, F. (2006). Communication in ants. Current Biology, 16, R570-R574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.015
dc.relation.referencesJohnson-Ulrich, L. (2018). The Social Intelligence Hypothesis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3100-1
dc.relation.referencesKamil, A. C. (2004). Sociality and the evolution of intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8*(5), 195-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.002
dc.relation.referencesKeller, L., & Genoud, M. (1997). Extraordinary lifespans in ants: A test of evolutionary theories of aging. Nature, 389, 958-960.
dc.relation.referencesKenny, A. (2010). Concepts, Brains, and Behaviour, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 81 (1): 105–113.
dc.relation.referencesKnoll, A., & Rey, G. (2017). Arthropod Intentionality? In K. Andrews & J. Beck (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. Abingdon: Routledge. Routledge Handbooks Online.
dc.relation.referencesKnoll, A., & Rey, G. (2018). Arthropod intentionality? In The Routledge Handbook of Animal Minds* (pp. 13-25). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesLehewych, D. (2019) Aristole and Descartes on animals. Medium. Recuperado de https://daniellehewych.medium.com/aristotle-and-descartes-on-animals-a73c8a27d0bf
dc.relation.referencesLópez, C. (2018). Inteligencia animal: Un estudio desde Historia Animalium de Aristóteles (Tesis de doctorado). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesLurz, R. W. (2009). Philosophy of Animal Minds. R. W. Lurz (Ed.), The philosophy of animal minds: An introduction (pp. 1-15). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMarchesini, R. (2021). Animales, Etología y Filosofía. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 21(43), 231-263. DOI: 10.18270/rcfc.v43i21.3792
dc.relation.referencesMerkle, T., Knaden, M., & Wehner, R. (2006). Uncertainty about nest position influences systematic search strategies in desert ants. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209(18), 3545-3549.
dc.relation.referencesMerkle, T., & Wehner, R. (2010). Desert ants use foraging distance to adapt the nest search to the uncertainty of the path integrator. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp197.
dc.relation.referencesParr, C. L., & Bishop, T. R. (2022). The response of ants to climate change. Global Change Biology, 28, 3188–3205. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16140
dc.relation.referencesParunak, V. (2005). Expert Assessment of Human-Human Stigmergy. Altarum Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan. (Informe No. 38).
dc.relation.referencesPeacocke, C. (1992). A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesPinker, S. (2007). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. London: Penguin.
dc.relation.referencesProust, J. (2017). Nonhuman Metacognition. En K. Andrews y J. Beck (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds (pp. 142-153). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742250.
dc.relation.referencesProust, J. (2018). Nonhuman metacognition. In The Routledge Handbook of Animal Minds (pp. 142). Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesQuine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesReeve, H. K., & Nonacs, P. (1997). Within-group aggression and the value of group members: Theory and a field test with social wasps. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 75-82.
dc.relation.referencesRescorla, M. (2018). Maps in the head? En K. Andrews & J. Beck (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of animal minds (pp. 34–45). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742250-4
dc.relation.referencesRichards, M. H. (2022). Tool use by foraging ants. Insectes Sociaux, 69(1-2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00855-7
dc.relation.referencesRömer, D., Cosarinsky, M. I., & Roces, F. (2020). Selection and spatial arrangement of building materials during the construction of nest turrets by grass-cutting ants. Royal Society Open Science, 7(12), 201312201312.
dc.relation.referencesRosengren, R., & Fortelius, W. (1987). Trail communication and directional recruitment to food in red wood ants (Formica). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 24(2), 137–146. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23734459. Accessed January 13, 2024.
dc.relation.referencesSankovitz, M., & Purcell, J. (2021). Ant nest architecture is shaped by local adaptation and plastic response to temperature. Scientific Reports, 11, 23053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02491-w
dc.relation.referencesTraniello, J. F. A. (1989). Foraging strategies of ants. Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
dc.relation.referencesUexküll, J. von. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere [El mundo circundante e interior de los animales].
dc.relation.referencesVillareal, H., Alvarez, M., Cordoba, F., Fagua, G., Gast, F., Mendoza, H., Ospina, M., & Umaña. (2006). Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesWang, S., & Song, W. (2016). Experimental Study of Ant Movement in a Straight Passageway under Stress Conditions. Journal of Insect Behavior, 29(6), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-016-9593-x
dc.relation.referencesWehner, R. (2003). Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 189(6), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1
dc.relation.referencesWehner, R., & Menzel, R. (1990). Do insects have cognitive maps? Annual review of neuroscience, 13, 403-14 .
dc.relation.referencesWehner, R., & Rössler, W. (2013). Bounded Plasticity in the Desert Ant’s Navigational Tool Kit. En R. Menzel & P. R. Benjamin (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience (Vol. 22, pp. 514-529). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415823-8.00039-3
dc.relation.referencesZhou, A., Du, Y., & Chen, J. (2020). Ants adjust their tool use strategy in response to foraging risk. Functional Ecology, 34, 2524–2535. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13671
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.rights.localAcceso cerradospa
dc.subjectHormigas
dc.subjectInteligencia
dc.subjectEtología
dc.subjectMentes animales
dc.subject.ddc153spa
dc.subject.keywordsAnts
dc.subject.keywordsIntelligence
dc.subject.keywordsEthology
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal minds
dc.titleMentes Animales, Hormigas e Inteligencia
dc.title.translatedAnimal Minds, Ants and Inteligence
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa

Archivos

Colecciones

Maestría en Filosofía de la Ciencia