Logotipo del repositorio

Is Scientific Realism Compatible with Ontological Emergentism?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorCíntora, Armando
dc.date2020-07-31
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-22T21:27:36Z
dc.date.available2025-08-22T21:27:36Z
dc.descriptionIt is argued that epistemic attitude (ethos or stance) of the scientific realist -i.e., the search for explanations even conjecturing unobservables, the goal of minimising the universe of brute facts- is incompatible with the attitude of a strong or ontological emergentist, one that resigns itself to leaving unexplained and as unexplainable some emergence phenomena, hence it is argued that scientific realism is inimical to this to this kind of emergentism, one resigned to ignorance. It is also argued that the realist attitude is preferable for scientific research, since the scientific realist wagers on keeping investigating and inquiring.en-US
dc.descriptionSe argumenta que la actitud epistémica (el ethos o stance) del realista científico - i.e., la búsqueda de explicaciones aun conjeturando inobservables, el querer minimizar el universo de los hechos brutos- es incompatible con  aquella  de  un  emergentismo  fuerte  u  ontológico que se resigna a dejar como inexplicados y como inexplicables algunos fenómenos de emergencia,  por  lo  que  el  realismo científico  no  es  compatible  con  este  tipo  de  emergentismo, uno resignado a la ignorancia. También se  argumenta  que  la  actitud realista es la preferible para la investigación científica, pues el realista científico apuesta por seguir investigando, por seguir perquiriendo.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3236
dc.identifier10.18270/rcfc.v20i40.3236
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/17120
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3236/2803
dc.relation/*ref*/Bedau, Mark. “Downward Causation and Autonomy in Weak Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 2003. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, ma: The mit Press, 2008. 155-188. <https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0014>.
dc.relation/*ref*/Beuamont, Bertrand. “Hegel and the Seven Planets”. Mind 63.250 (1954): 246-248.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bonjour, Laurence. Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. 2nd. ed. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc, 2009.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cíntora, Armando. “¿Pueden los ideales ser racionales?”. Signos Filosóficos 10.20 (2008): 145-154. <http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/signosf/v10n20/v10n20a7.pdf >.
dc.relation/*ref*/______. “El disenso axiológico entre realistas y anti realistas científicos”. Praxis Filosófica 45 (2017): 11-23.< https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i45S.6063>.
dc.relation/*ref*/Dennet, Daniel. “Real Patterns”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1991. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 189-206.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hempel, Carl y Paul Oppenheim. “On the Idea of Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1965. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 61-68. <10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0004>.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hendry, Robin. “Prospects for Strong Emergence in Chemistry”. Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. Eds. Michele Paolini y Francesco Orilia. London: Routledge, 2017. 1-14. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638577>.
dc.relation/*ref*/Humphreys, Paul. “How Properties Emerge”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1997. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 111-126. <10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0008>
dc.relation/*ref*/Kim, Jaegwon. “Making Sense of Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1999. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 127-154.
dc.relation/*ref*/Maudlin, Tim. “Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory”. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2019.
dc.relation/*ref*/McLaughlin, Brian. “Emergence and Supervenience”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1997. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 81-98.
dc.relation/*ref*/Oppenheim, Paul y Hilary Putnam. “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2.1 (1958): 3-36.
dc.relation/*ref*/Orilia, Francesco y Chris Swoyer. “Properties”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). Ed. Edward N. Zalta <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/properties/>
dc.relation/*ref*/Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. New York: Pinguin Books, 1991.
dc.relation/*ref*/Prigogine, Ilya e Isabelle Stengers. “Order Out of Chaos: Man’s Dialogue with Nature”. USA, Canada: Bantam Books, 1984.
dc.relation/*ref*/Searle, John. “Reductionism and the Irreducibility of Consciousness”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1992. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 69-80.
dc.relation/*ref*/Symons, John. “Brute Facts about Emergence”. Brute Facts. Eds. EllyVintiadis y Constantinos Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 177-195.
dc.relation/*ref*/Taylor, Elanor. “How to Make the Case for Brute Facts”. Brute Facts. Eds. EllyVintiadis y Constantinos Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 28-44.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wyss, Peter. “Emergence: Inexplicable but Explanatory”. Brute Facts. Eds. Elly, Vintiadis y Constantinos, Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 213-233.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaes-ES
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 20 No. 40 (2020): Realismo científico y leyes de la naturaleza: de la filosofía general de la ciencia a la metafísica de la ciencia; 185-198en-US
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 20 Núm. 40 (2020): Realismo científico y leyes de la naturaleza: de la filosofía general de la ciencia a la metafísica de la ciencia; 185-198es-ES
dc.source2463-1159
dc.source0124-4620
dc.source10.18270/rcfc.v20i40
dc.subjectemergentismen-US
dc.subjectontological brute factsen-US
dc.subjectscientific realismen-US
dc.subjectstancesen-US
dc.subjectrationalityen-US
dc.subjectemergentismoes-ES
dc.subjecthechos brutos ontológicoses-ES
dc.subjectrealismo científicoes-ES
dc.subjectstanceses-ES
dc.subjectracionalidades-ES
dc.titleIs Scientific Realism Compatible with Ontological Emergentism?en-US
dc.title¿Es compatible el realismo científico con el emergentismo ontólogico?es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

7. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia - Cosecha

Software DSpace copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS