Diseño de una batería de herramientas para la caracterización de los peligros inherentes a la exposición a radiación ionizante en médicos nucleares en Colombia

Guzmán Fonseca, Juan Sebastián; Mercado Ibañez, Leidy Marcela; Villarreal Navarrete, Luisa Catalina

Diseño de una batería de herramientas para la caracterización de los peligros inherentes a la exposición a radiación ionizante en médicos nucleares en Colombia

dc.contributor.advisor	Giraldo Luna, Clara Margarita
dc.contributor.advisor	Cetina Castillo, Lidy Yadira
dc.contributor.author	Guzmán Fonseca, Juan Sebastián
dc.contributor.author	Mercado Ibañez, Leidy Marcela
dc.contributor.author	Villarreal Navarrete, Luisa Catalina
dc.contributor.orcid	Guzmán Fonseca, Juan Sebastián [0009-0002-1106-8118]
dc.contributor.orcid	Mercado Ibañez, Leidy Marcela [0000-0002-8849-1910]
dc.contributor.orcid	Villarreal Navarrete, Luisa Catalina [0009-0001-3872-9820]
dc.date.accessioned	2024-08-09T19:10:43Z
dc.date.available	2024-08-09T19:10:43Z
dc.date.issued	2024-06
dc.description.abstract	A partir de una revisión de literatura en bases de datos de revistas indexadas como Science Direct, Taylor & Francis y Web of Science, los manuales de seguridad y protección radiológica de la Organización Internacional de Energía Atómica y la legislación colombiana se realizó la clasificación de las recomendaciones técnicas sobre prácticas de control en tres principios de protección radiológica: Justificación, Optimización de la protección y Dosis límite. En relación con la percepción del riesgo se adoptó el modelo planteado por el Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Seguridad en el Trabajo para el desarrollo del constructo de soporte al cuestionario. Se realizó el diseño de la herramienta para la evaluación de los controles a la exposición a radiación ionizante contiene 154 criterios distribuidos en nueve grupos que abordan entre otros aspectos el desarrollo e implementación de los programas de protección radiológica, las pruebas sobre las fuentes de radiación, el diseño de la infraestructura, el control de las dosis de exposición, el entrenamiento y la vigilancia del estado de salud de los trabajadores expuestos. Por otra parte la herramienta de evaluación de la percepción del riesgo por parte del trabajador considera 42 preguntas distribuidas en cinco grupos relacionados con el riesgo: conocimiento, percepción, actitudes, comportamientos, experiencias y una sección adicional sobre el contexto laboral y social.
dc.description.abstractenglish	Based on a literature review in databases of indexed journals such as Science Direct, Taylor & Francis and Web of Science, the safety and radiological protection manuals of the International Atomic Energy Organization and Colombian legislation, the classification of the technical recommendations on control practices in three principles of radiation protection: Justification, Optimization of protection and Limit dose. In relation to risk perception, the model proposed by the National Institute of Hygiene and Safety at Work was adopted for the development of the construct to support the questionnaire. The design of the tool for the evaluation of controls on exposure to ionizing radiation was carried out. It contains 154 criteria distributed in nine groups that address, among other aspects, the development and implementation of radiological protection programs, tests on radiation sources, the design of the infrastructure, the control of exposure doses, training and monitoring of the health status of exposed workers. On the other hand, the tool for evaluating the worker's risk perception considers 42 questions distributed in five groups related to risk: knowledge, perception, attitudes, behaviors, experiences and an additional section on the work and social context.
dc.description.degreelevel	Especialización	spa
dc.description.degreename	Especialista en Higiene Industrial	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad El Bosque	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/12861
dc.language.iso	es
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Medicina	spa
dc.publisher.grantor	Universidad El Bosque	spa
dc.publisher.program	Especialización en Higiene Industrial	spa
dc.relation.references	González Sprinberg G, Rabin Lema C. Para entender las radiaciones. Energía nuclear, medicina, industria. Facultad de Ciencias U de la R, editor. DIRAC. 2011 [cited 2024 Jun 19]; Available from: https://www.academia.edu/12611138/Para_Entender_las_Radiaciones_AUTORES_Dr_Gabriel_Gonz%C3%A1lez_Sprinberg
dc.relation.references	López Roldán A, Martín C, Tornel Cerezo M, Baiget Pons A, Fernández Rodríguez D. Cuidados relativos a una técnica de angiografía coronaria que minimiza la administración de contraste yodado y la exposición a las radiaciones ionizantes: la angiografía coronaria rotacional. Enfermería en Cardiología [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Jun 19];89–93. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7103599
dc.relation.references	Burgess L, Roy S, Morgan S, Malone S. A review on the current treatment paradigm in high-risk prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel) [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];13(17). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8428221/
dc.relation.references	Alert Silva J, Jiménez Medina J, Rodríguez Machado J. Las complicaciones intestinales en los tratamientos por radiaciones ionizantes de los carcinomas del cuello del útero. Estudio en una serie de 1 530 pacientes [Internet]. 1978 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/1209#:~:text=En%20una%20serie%20de%201%20530%20pacientes%20procedentes,carcinomas%20cerv%C3%ADcouterino%2C%20aparecieron%20complicaciones%20intestinales%20en%20381%20%2824%2C8%25%29.
dc.relation.references	Presidencia de la República. Decreto Ley 2090 de 2003 [Internet]. 2090 Colombia, Colombia: Decreto Ley; Jul 26, 2003. Available from: https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=9193
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Trabajo. Resolución 312 de 2019 [Internet]. 312 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Feb 13, 2019. Available from: https://www.mintrabajo.gov.co/documents/20147/59995826/Resolucion+0312-2019-+Estandares+minimos+del+Sistema+de+la+Seguridad+y+Salud.pdf
dc.relation.references	International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Human. A review of human carcinogens Volume 100 D: Radiation. 2009 [cited 2024 Jun 17]; Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-Carcinogenic-Hazards-To-Humans/Radiation-2012
dc.relation.references	Purdue MP, Hutchings SJ, Rushton L, Silverman DT. The proportion of cancer attributable to occupational exposures. Ann Epidemiol [Internet]. 2015 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];25(3):188–92. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1047279714005109#:~:text=Nonetheless%2C%20the%20majority%20of%20published%20reports%20suggest%20that,in%20developed%20countries%20ranges%20between%202%25%20and%208%25.
dc.relation.references	Marant Micallef C, Shield KD, Vignat J, Baldi I, Charbotel B, Fervers B, et al. Cancers in France in 2015 attributable to occupational exposures. Int J Hyg Environ Health [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];222(1):22–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30174219/
dc.relation.references	Qu C, He R, Hou W, Ye W, Cao H, Zhang H, et al. Global burden of neoplasms attributable to specific occupational carcinogens over 30 years: a population-based study. Public Health [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];223:145–55. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003335062300272X
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. Resolución 2400 de 1979 [Internet]. 2400 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; May 22, 1979. Available from: https://webapps.ilo.org/dyn/travail/docs/1509/industrial%20safety%20statute.pdf
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Minas y Energía. Resolución 181434 de 2005 [Internet]. 181434 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Dec 5, 2005. Available from: https://www.minenergia.gov.co/documents/7512/20914-1695.pdf
dc.relation.references	Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica. Protección radiológica y seguridad de las fuentes de radiación: Normas básicas internacionales de seguridad [Internet]. Austria; 2016. Available from: http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/
dc.relation.references	American Conference of Govemmental Industrial Hygienists ACGIH. Threshold Limit Values TLVs ® for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices BEIs ®. ACGIH, editor. Cincinnati; 2024.
dc.relation.references	Cho SG, Kim J, Song HC. Radiation Safety in Nuclear Medicine Procedures [Internet]. Vol. 51, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Springer Verlag; 2017 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. p. 11–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313457/
dc.relation.references	Donya M, Radford M, ElGuindy A, Firmin D, Yacoub MH. Radiation in medicine: Origins, risks and aspirations. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 Jun 19];2014(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355517/
dc.relation.references	Ministerio del Trabajo. Sistema de información sobre la exposición ocupacional a agentes carcinógenos para Colombia Colombia CAREX 2012 Población asegurada [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.fondoriesgoslaborales.gov.co/documents/publicaciones/guias/Colombia%20CAREX.pdf
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Plan Decenal para el Control del Cáncer en Colombia, 2012 – 2021. 2012 [cited 2024 Jun 19]; Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Documents/Plan-Decenal-Cancer/PlanDecenal_ControlCancer_2012-2021.pdf
dc.relation.references	Minister of Health Canada. Report on occupational radiation exposures in Canada 2008-2018 [Internet]. Ottawa; 2021 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/411512/publication.html
dc.relation.references	Scialdone García A. Revista de seguridad nuclear y protección radiológica. La Subdirección de Protección Radiológica Operacional, un área del CSN que vela por la seguridad de los trabajadores [Internet]. 2016. Available from: www.csn.es
dc.relation.references	Arjona RH, Piñeiros J, Ayabaca M, Freire FH. Climate change and agricultural workers’ health in Ecuador: Occupational exposure to UV radiation and hot environments. Ann Ist Super Sanita [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Jun 19];52(3):368–73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27698295/
dc.relation.references	Legis. Ámbito Jurídico [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.ambitojuridico.com/
dc.relation.references	Congreso de la República de Colombia, Senado de la República de Colombia. Repositorio jurídico de la Secretaría del Senado [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/
dc.relation.references	Corte Constitucional. Sentencias y jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/
dc.relation.references	Presidencia de la República. Decreto 1072 de 2015 [Internet]. 1072 Colombia, Colombia: Decreto; May 26, 2015. Available from: https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=72173
dc.relation.references	Taniguchi Y, Wakabayashi H, Yoneyama H, Chen Z, Morino K, Otosaki A, et al. Application of a tungsten apron for occupational radiation exposure in nursing care of children with neuroblastoma during 131I-meta-iodo-benzyl-guanidine therapy. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];12(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34996922/
dc.relation.references	Miszczyk J, Gałaś A, Panek A, Kowalska A, Kostkiewicz M, Borkowska E, et al. Genotoxicity Associated with131I and 99mTc Exposure in Nuclear Medicine Staff: A Physical and Biological Monitoring Study. Cells [Internet]. 2022 May 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];11(10). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35626692/
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Minas y Energía. Resolución 41226 de 2016 [Internet]. 41226 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Dec 16, 2016. Available from: https://www.minenergia.gov.co/documents/7515/37323-Resolucion-41226-16Dic2016.pdf
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de salud y protección social. Resolución 482 de 2018 [Internet]. 482 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Feb 22, 2018. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/Resoluci%C3%B3n%20No.%20482%20de%202018.pdf
dc.relation.references	Li M, Deng L, Zhou W, Zhao Y, Wang T, Hao S, et al. Trends of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in Central China for the period 2000–2021. Applied Radiation and Isotopes [Internet]. 2024 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];208. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38484590/
dc.relation.references	Biso SMR, Vidovich MI. Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory [Internet]. Vol. 12, Journal of Thoracic Disease. AME Publishing Company; 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. p. 1648–55. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32395308/
dc.relation.references	Chew MT, Jones B, Hill M, Bradley DA. Radiation, a two-edged sword: From untoward effects to fractionated radiotherapy. Radiation Physics and Chemistry [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];178. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X20303182
dc.relation.references	Aristizábal JM. Cardiovascular risk related to ionizing radiation. Revista Colombiana de Cardiologia [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];27:21–4. Available from: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-colombiana-cardiologia-203-articulo-riesgo-cardiovascular-relacionado-con-radiacion-S0120563319302141
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Minas y Energía. Resolución 181475 de 2004 [Internet]. 181475 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Nov 12, 2004. Available from: https://www.minenergia.gov.co/documents/7522/RES181475_2004.pdf
dc.relation.references	Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica. Protección y seguridad radiológicas en los usos médicos de la radiación ionizante [Internet]. Austria; 2022. Available from: www.iaea.org/es/recursos/normas-de-seguridad
dc.relation.references	Ribeiro A, Husson O, Drey N, Murray I, May K, Thurston J, et al. Ionising radiation exposure from medical imaging – A review of Patient’s (un) awareness. Radiography [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];26(2):e25–30. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817419301518
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Minas y Energía. Resolución 181289 de 2005 [Internet]. 181289 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Oct 6, 2005. Available from: https://www.minenergia.gov.co/documents/7521/RES181289_2004.pdf
dc.relation.references	Zhang X, Chen X, Wang L, Wang A, He C, Shi Z, et al. Protective effects of Yiqi jiedu decoction on ionizing radiation-induced spermatogenic cell injury. J Ethnopharmacol [Internet]. 2022 Dec 5 [cited 2024 Jun 19];299. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874122007206
dc.relation.references	Chen Y, Cui J, Gong Y, Wei S, Wei Y, Yi L. MicroRNA: a novel implication for damage and protection against ionizing radiation. 2021 [cited 2024 Jun 19]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854028/
dc.relation.references	Wang Q, Xie C, Xi S, Qian F, Peng X, Huang J, et al. Radioprotective effect of flavonoids on ionizing radiation-induced brain damage [Internet]. Vol. 25, Molecules. MDPI AG; 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33287417/
dc.relation.references	Nickoloff JA, Sharma N, Allen CP, Taylor L, Allen SJ, Jaiswal AS, et al. Roles of homologous recombination in response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage [Internet]. Vol. 99, International Journal of Radiation Biology. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. p. 903–14. Available from: https://www-webofscience-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000681118300001
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Minas y Energía. Resolución 180005 de 2010 [Internet]. 180005 Colombia, Colombia: Resolución; Jan 5, 2010. Available from: https://www.minenergia.gov.co/documents/7518/RES180005_2010.pdf
dc.relation.references	Gresko M V., Perchuk I V. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF RADIATION RISK PERCEPTION. Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Jun 19];26:371–97. Available from: “https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34965561/ 10.33145/2304-8336-2021-26-371-397”
dc.relation.references	International Labour Organization (ILO). Percepción del riesgo [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2024 Jun 17]. Available from: https://iloencyclopaedia.org/es/part-viii-12633/safety-policy-and-leadership/item/986-risk-perception
dc.relation.references	Gravseth HM, Holte KA, Kines P, Lappalainen J, Mikkelsen KL, Olsen A, et al. Cuestionario Nórdico sobre seguridad en el trabajo [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 17]. Available from: https://nfa.dk/vaerktoejer/spoergeskemaer/safety-climate-questionnaire-nosacq-50/
dc.relation.references	Lee Y, Choi YY, Yang M, Jin YW, Seong KM. Risk perception of radiation emergency medical staff on low-dose radiation exposure: Knowledge is a critical factor. J Environ Radioact [Internet]. 2021 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];227. Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/science/article/pii/S0265931X20307487/pdfft?md5=499fb1ee506c360a53f69add735bac08&pid=1-s2.0-S0265931X20307487-main.pdf
dc.relation.references	Kenny E, Byrne B, Lewis M, King DM. Perception of medical radiation risk in Ireland: Results of a public survey. Physica Medica [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];68:96–103. Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/science/article/pii/S112017971930482X/pdfft?md5=93825e1551743172bfe582d2fc435708&pid=1-s2.0-S112017971930482X-main.pdf
dc.relation.references	Zekioğlu A, Parlar Ş. Investigation of awareness level concerning radiation safety among healthcare professionals who work in a radiation environment. J Radiat Res Appl Sci [Internet]. 2021 Dec [cited 2024 Jun 19];14(1):1–8. Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/science/article/pii/S1687850722000012/pdfft?md5=00f925f0d18773ba5b69b1e646ea5043&pid=1-s2.0-S1687850722000012-main.pdf
dc.relation.references	Mohd Ridzwan SF, Bhoo-Pathy N, Isahak M, Wee LH. Perceptions on radioprotective garment usage and underlying reasons for non-adherence among medical radiation workers from public hospitals in a middle-income Asian setting: A qualitative exploration. Heliyon [Internet]. 2019 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];5(9). Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/science/article/pii/S2405844019361389/pdfft?md5=346a8ab492034847d537ebfcce39a1de&pid=1-s2.0-S2405844019361389-main.pdf
dc.relation.references	Nair S. Understanding the risks of ionizing radiation exposure: a case of dichotomy between science and policy. In: Biological and Environmental Hazards, Risks, and Disasters, Second Edition [Internet]. Elsevier; 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. p. 481–97. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128205099000150
dc.relation.references	Maharjan S, Parajuli K, Sah S, Poudel U. Knowledge of radiation protection among radiology professionals and students: A medical college-based study. Eur J Radiol Open [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];7. Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/science/article/pii/S2352047720300769/pdfft?md5=b3a769e69147ab19bb9ee0bf94e0c74e&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047720300769-main.pdf
dc.relation.references	Barare C, Odongo J. Awareness on Ionizing Radiation among Non Radiation Healthcare Workers at Teaching and Referral Hospital in East Africa. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci [Internet]. 2022 Dec [cited 2024 Jun 19];53(4):S16–7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1939865422004349
dc.relation.references	Nasr RY, Barnawi RA, Radi ON, Wazzan M, Batawil N, Khashoggi K, et al. Analysis of public perception about ionizing radiation. Radioprotection. 2019 Oct;54(4):289–93.
dc.relation.references	Lakhwani OP, Dalal V, Jindal M, Nagala A. Radiation protection and standardization [Internet]. Vol. 10, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. Elsevier B.V.; 2019 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. p. 738–43. Available from: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/science/article/pii/S097656621830167X
dc.relation.references	Koch GGV, Engel-Hills P, Friedrich-Nel H. Individual patient radiation dose tracking: Perceptions of radiographers in South Africa. Radiography [Internet]. 2024 May 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];30(3):1014–20. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424000981
dc.relation.references	Hazem M, Al Murawhan B, Al Saeed KFUH AA, Al-Omran QA, Qusay Al Murawhan B, Al Omran AA, et al. Perception of Radiation Hazards by Medical Interns in Eastern Providence [Internet]. Vol. 10, International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research. 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www-webofscience-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000603633300008
dc.relation.references	Whitney GM, Thomas JJ, Austin TM, Fanfan J, Yaster M. Radiation Safety Perceptions and Practices among Pediatric Anesthesiologists: A Survey of the Physician Membership of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2019 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];128(6):1242–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31094794/
dc.relation.references	Zervides C, Sassis L, Kefala-Karli P, Christou V, Derlagen A, Papapetrou P, et al. Assessing radiation protection knowledge in diagnostic radiography in the Republic of Cyprus. A questionnaire survey. Radiography. 2020 May 1;26(2):e88–93.
dc.relation.references	Younger CWE, Wagner MJ, Douglas C, Warren-Forward H. Describing ionising radiation risk in the clinical setting: A systematic review. Radiography [Internet]. 2019 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];25(1):83–90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.11.002
dc.relation.references	Jeyasugiththan J, Dissanayake DMTPB, Kohombakadawala IMCWB, Satharasinghe DM. Assessment of the awareness of radiation protection and related concepts among nursing staff mainly working in diagnostic imaging units, cath-labs and operation theatres in Sri Lanka: A survey-based study. Radiography [Internet]. 2023 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];29(2):319–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.01.002
dc.relation.references	Alasmari Y, Alnowami MR, Alkhateeb SM, Djouider F. Assessment of radiographers’ understanding of radiation safety and their occupational radiation exposure in the Asir region of Saudi Arabia. Radiation Physics and Chemistry [Internet]. 2023 Nov 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];212. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111148
dc.relation.references	Miller DL. Make Radiation Protection a Habit. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Jun 19];21(1):37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.008
dc.relation.references	Arregui Eaton IG, Chaparro Caso López AA, Cordero Arroyo G. El índice de validez de contenido (ivc) de Lawshe, para la obtención de evidencias de validez de contenido en la construcción de un instrumento. In: Universidad de Guadalajara, editor. Prácticas de investigación aplicada a contextos educativos [Internet]. 1st ed. Guadalajara; 2017 [cited 2024 Jun 17]. p. 69–96. Available from: 18/06/2024https://editorial.udg.mx/gpd-practicas-de-investigacion-aplicada-a-contextos-educativos.html
dc.relation.references	Agustin Barrios NG. Validación de instrumento que evalúa habilidades investigativas y herramientas tecnológicas para investigación. Revista Científica del Sistema de Estudios de Postgrado de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala [Internet]. 2023 Nov 14 [cited 2024 Jun 19];6(2):131–42. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375644854_Validacion_de_instrumento_que_evalua_habilidades_investigativas_y_herramientas_tecnologicas_para_investigacion
dc.relation.references	Lalinde H, Diego J, Castro E, Rangel C, Gerardo J, Sierra T, et al. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: definición, propiedades y suposiciones. 2018; Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?
dc.relation.references	Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernández-Baeza A, Tomás-Marco I. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicologia [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 Jun 19];30(3):1151–69. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-40212-041
dc.relation.references	Manuel Batista-Foguet J, Coenders G, Alonso J. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med Clin (Barc) [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2024 Jun 19];122:21–8. Available from: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-medicina-clinica-2-articulo-analisis-factorial-confirmatorio-su-utilidad-13057542
dc.relation.references	Quero Virla M. Confiabilidad y coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. 1997 [cited 2024 Jun 19];12(2):248–52. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228778515_Confiabilidad_y_coeficiente_Alpha_de_Cronbach
dc.relation.references	Berchtold A. Test–retest: Agreement or reliability? Method Innov [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Jun 19];9. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309099517_Test-retest_Agreement_or_reliability
dc.relation.references	Blabia D, Pujolar D, Martínez J. Análisis de sensibilidad. 2013 [cited 2024 Jun 19]; Available from: https://openaccess.uoc.edu/bitstream/10609/68705/4/Optimizaci%C3%B3n_M%C3%B3dulo%206_An%C3%A1lisis%20de%20sensibilidad.pdf
dc.relation.references	Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Ngo K, McDowell M, Holzmueller C, Haraden C, et al. Developing and Pilot Testing Quality Indicators in the Intensive Care Unit. J Crit Care [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2024 Jun 19];18(3):145–55. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14595567/
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 3100 de 2019 [Internet]. Colombia: Resolución; Nov 25, 2019. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/Resoluci%C3%B3n%20No.%203100%20de%202019.pdf
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de la Protección Social. Comisión Nacional de Salud Ocupacional del Sector Salud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.fondoriesgoslaborales.gov.co/comision-sector-salud/
dc.relation.references	Perko T, Raskob W, Jourdain JR. Improved communication, understanding of risk perception and ethics related to ionising radiation. In: Journal of Radiological Protection [Internet]. Institute of Physics Publishing; 2016 [cited 2024 Jun 19]. p. E15–22. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27272146/
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.local	Acceso abierto	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subject	Radiación Ionizante
dc.subject	Exposición ocupacional
dc.subject	Control a la exposición
dc.subject	Percepción del riesgo
dc.subject.keywords	Ionizing radiation
dc.subject.keywords	Occupational exposure
dc.subject.keywords	Exposure control
dc.subject.keywords	Risk perception
dc.subject.nlm	WA450
dc.title	Diseño de una batería de herramientas para la caracterización de los peligros inherentes a la exposición a radiación ionizante en médicos nucleares en Colombia
dc.title.translated	Design of a battery of tools for the characterization of the dangers inherent to exposure to ionizing radiation in nuclear doctors in Colombia
dc.type.coar	https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversion	https://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.hasversion	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.local	Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Especialización	spa