Divino y humano. Contradicción, lógica y racionalidad de la doctrina de la encarnación

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorGómez Gutiérrez, Susana
dc.contributor.orcidGómez Gutiérrez, Susana [0000-0002-3539-1545]spa
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T16:08:12Z
dc.date.available2023-12-05T16:08:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este libro es defender la plausibilidad de una aproximación dialetheista a uno de los principales dogmas del cristianismo, la doctrina de la encarnación, según la cual Jesucristo es verdaderamente divino y verdaderamen te humano. La autora sostiene que, de ser esta una teoría dialetheista o contradictoria –y desde su punto de vista hay razones para pensar que lo es–, no se desprendería de ello ningún problema lógico o epistemológico que pudiera afectarla. Para demostrarlo, se propone responder a dos objeciones que se han hecho o podrían hacerse a una postura de esta índole. La primera es la objeción lógica, que en realidad son dos: la de la ilogicidad y la del absurdo lógico. La segunda, que ella ha llamado objeción epistemológica, apunta al hecho de que, de ser una contradicción genuina, la doctrina sería irracional. Su respuesta a estas objeciones está basada en los trabajos de notables autores contemporáneos, como Graham Priest, Jc Beall y James Anderson.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe objective of this book is to defend the plausibility of a dialetheist approach to one of the central dogmas of Christianity, the doctrine of the incarnation, according to which Jesus Christ is truly divine and truly human. The author maintains that if this doctrine were a dialetheist or contradictory theory – and, from her perspective, there are reasons to think it is – no logical or epistemological problems would arise that could affect it. To demonstrate this, she proposes to respond to two objections that have been made or could be made to a position of this kind. The first is the logical objection, which is actually two: that of illogicality and that of logical absurdity. The second, which she has called the epistemological objection, points to the fact that the doctrine would be irrational if it were a genuine contradiction. Her response to these objections is based on the works of notable contemporary authors, such as Graham Priest, Jc Beall, and James Anderson.spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-739-358-3spa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/11660
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquespa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad El Bosquespa
dc.relation.referencesAcero, J. J. (2011). Analytic philosophy as metaphilosophy. Teorema, 30(1), 65-75.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmesbury, R. (2016). Fideism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideismspa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. (2007). Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status. Wipf and Stock.spa
dc.relation.referencesArendzen, J. (1909). Docetae. New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05070c.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesAsenjo, F. G. (1966). A calculus of antinomies. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 7(1), 103-105.spa
dc.relation.referencesAsenjo, F. G. y Tamburino, J. (1975). Logic of antinomies. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 16(1), 17-44.spa
dc.relation.referencesBäck, A. T. (1997). On Reduplication: Logical Theories of Qualification. E. J. Brill.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarry, W. (1907). Arianism. New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01707c.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2004). True and false–As if. En G. Priest, J. C. Beall y B. Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (pp. 197-216). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2009). Spandrels of Truth. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2015). Free of detachment: Logic, rationality and gluts. Noûs, 49(2), 410-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12029spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2018). The simple argument for subclassical logic. Philosophical Issues, 28, 30-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12133 Beall, J. C. (2019a). Christ, a contradiction: A defense of contra- dictory christology. Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 400-433. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.090202010411spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2019b). The Contradictory Christ: A Short Sketch on the What? How? and Why? [conferencia]. Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology, University of St. Andrews.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2019c). On contradictory christology: A reply to Cotnoir’s «On the role of Logic». Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 529-543. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.113106106105108115spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. (2021). The Contradictory Christ. Oxford University Press. Beall, J. C., Glanzberg, M. y Ripley, D. (2017). Liar paradox. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liar-paradox/spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. y Logan, S. A. (2017). Logic: The Basics (2.a ed.). Routledge. Beall, J. C. y Restall, G. (2000). Logical pluralism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78, 475-493.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeall, J. C. y Restall, G. (2006). Logical Pluralism. Clarendon Press. Beall, J. C., Restall, G. y Sagi, G. (2019). Logical consequence. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archi- ves/spr2019/ entries/logical-consequence/spa
dc.relation.referencesBerto, F. (2007). How to Sell a Contradiction: The Logic and Metaphysics of Inconsistency, vol. 6. College Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesBobenrieth, A. (1996). ¿Inconsistencias: por qué no? Un estudio filosófico sobre la lógica paraconsistente. Colcultura.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoccardi, E. y Macías-Bustos, M. (2017). Contradictions in motion: Why they’re not needed and why they wouldn’t help. Humana.Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 32, 195-227.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoakley, S. (2002). What does Chalcedon solve and what does it not? Some reflections on the status and meaning of the Chalcedonian «definition». En S. T. Davis, D. Kendall y G. O’Collins (Eds.), The Incarnation (pp. 143-163). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCotnoir, A. J. (2019). On the role of logic in analytic theology: Exploring the wider context of Beall’s philosophy of logic. Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 508-524. https//doi.org/10.12978/ jat.2019-7.00-51-51021417spa
dc.relation.referencesCrisp, O. D. (2009a). Introduction. En O. D. Crisp (Ed.), A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology (pp. 1-8). T & T Clark.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrisp, O. D. (Ed.). (2009b). A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology. T & T Clark.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrisp, O. D. y Rea, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrombie, I. M. (1964). Theology and falsification. En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. 109-130). The Macmillan Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, R. (2009). The incarnation. En T. P. Flint y M. C. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (pp. 452-475). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrossley, J. y Dummett, M. (Eds.). (1965). Formal Systems and Recursive Functions. North-Holland Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesDahms, J. V. (1978). How reliable is logic? Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 21(4), 369-380.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavid, M. (2016). The correspondence theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ fall2016/entries/ truth-correspondence/spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, S. T. (1983). Logic and the Nature of God. William B. Eerdmans.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, S. T., Kendall, D. y O’Collins, G. (Eds.). (2002). The Incarnation. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenzinger, E. (1963). El magisterio de la Iglesia. Manual de los símbolos, definiciones y declaraciones de la Iglesia en materia de fe y costumbres. (D. R. Bueno, Trad.). Herder.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, C. S. (1998). Faith beyond Reason. Edinburgh University Press. Evans, C. S. (2006a). Kenotic christology and the nature of God. En C. S. Evans (Ed.), Exploring Kenotic Christology (pp. 190-217). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, C. S. (Ed.). (2006b). Exploring Kenotic Christology. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, E. (1956). Tertullian’s Treatise on the Incarnation. Wipf and Stock.spa
dc.relation.referencesFeenstra, R. J. (2006). A kenotic christology of the divine attributes. En C. S. Evans (Ed.), Exploring Kenotic Christology (pp. 139-164). Oxford University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesFergusson, D. (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth-Century Theology. Wiley-Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlew, A., Hare, R. y Mitchell, B. (1964). Theology and falsification. En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. 96-108). The Macmillan Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlew, A. y MacIntyre, A. (Eds.). (1964a). New Essays in Philosophical Theology. The Macmillan Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlew, A. y MacIntyre, A. (1964b). Preface. En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. vii-x). The Macmillan Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlint, T. P. y Rea, M. (2009a). Introduction. En T. P. Flint y M. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (pp. 1-7). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlint, T. P. y Rea, M. (Eds.). (2009b). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFogelin, R. J. (2019). La lógica de los desacuerdos profundos (D. M. Saldarriaga, Trad.). Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 19, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.15366/ria2019.19spa
dc.relation.referencesForero, J. A. (2018). La concepción semántica de la verdad: Correspondencia y lenguajes naturales (inédito).spa
dc.relation.referencesFrankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829-839.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrege, G. (1998). Función y concepto (1891). En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), Ensayos de semántica y filosofía de la lógica (pp. 53-79). Tecnos.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarrido, M. (2004). Ensayo preliminar. En D. Hume, Diálogos sobre la religión natural (pp. 13-61). Tecnos.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeivett, R. D. y Sweetman, B. (Eds.). (1992). Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGier, N. F. (1987). God, Reason and the Evangelicals: Case against Evan- gelical Rationalism. University Press of America.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, S. (2016). Contradicciones y racionalidad: Susana y los vie- jos jueces y la resurrección de Jesús, un estudio de casos. En J. A. F. Mora (Ed.), Racionalidad, lenguaje y acción, aproximaciones analíticas (pp. 109-130). Uniminuto.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, S. (2017). Algunos supuestos lógicos en el pensamiento de Kierkegaard y el carácter existencial de la fe. En R. Meléndez, L. F. Múnera y C. M. Gómez (Eds.), ¿Ciencia o religión? Exploraciones sobre las relaciones entre fe y racionalidad en el mundo contemporáneo (pp. 119-139). Editorial Universidad del Rosario; Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, S. (2020). Contradictions and rationality. An analysis of two biblical cases. En R. Silvestre, B. Göcke, J. Béziau y P. Bilimoria (Eds.), Beyond Faith and Rationality. Essays on Logic, Religion and Philosophy. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, G. (2010). Atonement. En C. Taliaferro y C. Meister (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology (pp. 124-135). Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrim, P. (2004). What is a contradiction? En G. Priest, J. C. Beall y B. P. Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (pp. 49-72). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaack, S. (1996). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. The University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaack, S. (1998). Filosofia das Lógicas (C. A. Mortari y L. H. Dutra, Trads.). Unesp.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. mit Press. Hasker, W. (2005). Analitic philosophy of religion. En W. J. Wainwright (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (pp. 421-446). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHempel, C. G. (2000). Problemas y cambios en el criterio empirista del significado (M. Bunge, E. O. Colombo, E. Arias y L. Fornasari, Trads.). En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 227-246). Tecnos.spa
dc.relation.referencesHick, J. (Ed.). (2011). Faith and the Philosophers. Palgrave Macmillan. Hunter, G. (1973). Metalogic: Introduction to the Metatheory of Standard First Order Logic. University of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesJenson, R. (2009). Ipse Pater Non Est Impassibilis. En J. F. Keating y T. J. White (Eds.), Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering (pp. 117-126). William B. Eerdmans.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeating, J. F. y White, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. William B. Eerdmans.spa
dc.relation.referencesKierkegaard, S. (2007). Migajas filosóficas o un poco de filosofía (R. Larrañeta, Ed. y Trad.). Trotta.spa
dc.relation.referencesKierkegaard, S. (2009). Ejercitación del cristianismo (D. G. Rivero, Trad.). Trotta.spa
dc.relation.referencesKripke, S. (1965). Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic i. En J. Crossley y M. Dummett (Eds.), Formal Systems and Recursive Functions (pp. 92-130). North-Holland Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesKripke, S. (1975). Outline of a theory of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 690-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024634spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, D. R. (2010). Kenotic christology. En D. Fergusson (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth-Century Theology (pp. 251- 279). Wiley-Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, D. R. (2013). Kierkegaard’s Kenotic Christology. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoux, M. J. y Zimmerman, D. W. (2003a). Introduction. En M. J. Loux y D. W. Zimmerman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (pp. 1-7). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoux, M. J. y Zimmerman, D. W. (Eds.). (2003b). The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacIntyre, A. (1970). The logical status of religious belief. En S. Toulmin, R. Hepburn y A. MacIntyre, Metaphysical Beliefs (2.a ed.) (pp. 157-201). Fletcher and Son.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacIntyre, A. (2011). Is understanding religion compatible with be- lieving? En J. Hick (Ed.), Faith and the Philosophers (pp. 115-133). Palgrave Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalcolm, N. (1992). The groundlessness of belief. En R. D. Geivett y B. Sweetman (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology (pp. 92-103). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesManzano, M. y Alonzo, E. (2010). Nociones de completud. Epistemens, 30(1), 51-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesMares, E. D. (2004). Semantic dialetheism. En G. Priest, J. Beall y B. Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (pp. 264-275). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Ordaz, M. (2021). Is Christ really contradictory? Some methodological concerns from the philosophy of science. Manuscrito, 44(4), 313-339. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.V44N4.MOspa
dc.relation.referencesMeléndez, R., Múnera, L. F. y Gómez, C. M. (Eds.). (2017). ¿Ciencia o religión? Exploraciones sobre las relaciones entre fe y racionalidad en el mundo contemporáneo. Editorial Universidad del Rosario; Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.spa
dc.relation.referencesMichon, C. (2010). Preface: Approches contemporaines. En C. Michon y R. Pouivet (Eds.), Philosophie de la religion (pp. 7-38). Vrin.spa
dc.relation.referencesMichon, C. y Pouivet, R. (Eds.). (2010). Philosophie de la religion. Vrin.spa
dc.relation.referencesMora, J. A. F. (Ed.). (2016). Racionalidad, lenguaje y acción, aproximaciones analíticas. Uniminuto.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorris, T. V. (2001). The Logic of God Incarnate. Wipf and Stock. Moschovakis, J. (2002). Intuitionistic logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/ entries/logic-intuitionistic/spa
dc.relation.referencesMueller, S. P. (2011). Docetism. The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670606.spa
dc.relation.referencesMulligan, K., Simons, P. y Smith, B. (1984). Truth-makers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44(3), 287-321. https://doi. org/10.2307/2107686spa
dc.relation.referencesNeed, S. W. (2008). Truly Divine and Truly Human: The Story of Christ and the Seven Ecumenical Councils. spCk; Hendrickson.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Collins, G. (2002). The incarnation: The critical issues. En S. T. Davis, D. Kendall y G. O’Collins (Eds.), The Incarnation (pp. 1-27). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPáramo, G. (1989). Lógica de los mitos: Lógica paraconsistente. Una alternativa en la discusión sobre la lógica del mito. Ideas y Valores, 38(79), 27-67.spa
dc.relation.referencesPawl, T. (2016). In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Es- say. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPelikan, J. (1971). The Christian Tradition: The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition, vol. 1. The University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeña, L. (1981). La coincidencia de los opuestos en Dios. Ediciones de la Universidad Católica.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, A. (2017). Argumentando Dios desde la filosofía analítica. Cracovia, Oxford y los comienzos de una nueva disciplina. Teología y Ciencia, 9, 68-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, A. (2018). Méta-theologie analytique. Scientia et Fides, 6. Plantinga, A. (1993a). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlantinga, A. (1993b). Warrant: The Current Dabate. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlantinga, A. (1998). Christian philosophy at the end of the twentieth century. En J. F. Sennet (Ed.), The Analytic Theist. An Alvin Plantinga Reader. William B. Eerdmans.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. (1979). The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 219-241.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. (2006a). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. (2006b). In Contradiction (2.a ed.). Clarendon Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. (2008). An Introduction to Non-Classical Logics. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. (2017). Things are not what they seem. En M. Silva (Ed.), How Colours Matter to Philosophy (pp. 225-236). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. (2019). A note on mathematical pluralism and logical pluralism. Synthese, 198 (Suppl 20), 4937-4946. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11229-019-02292-9spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G., Beall, J. C. y Armour-Garb, B. P. (Eds.). (2004). The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G., Berto, F. y Weber, Z. (2018). Dialetheism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ dialetheism/spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G. y Routley, R. (1989). Systems of paraconsistent logic. En G. Priest, R. Routley y J. Norman (Eds.), Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent (pp. 151-186). Philosophia Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G., Routley, R. y Norman, J. (Eds.). (1989). Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent. Philosophia Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriest, G., Tanaka, K. y Weber, Z. (2018). Paraconsistent logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/sum2018/entries/logic-paraconsistent/spa
dc.relation.referencesPrior, A. N. (1964). Can religion be discussed? En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. 1-11). The Macmillan Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuine, W. V. (1998). Filosofía de la lógica. Alianza.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuine, W. V. (2000). Dos dogmas del empirismo. En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 247-270). Tecnosspa
dc.relation.referencesRea, M. (Ed.). (2009). Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology: Trinity, Incarnation, Atonement. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRestall, G. (2002). Carnap’s tolerance, meaning and logical pluralism. The Journal of Philosophy, 99(8), 426-443.spa
dc.relation.referencesRussell, G. (2019). Logical pluralism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-pluralism/spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, A. F. (2011). Arius (c 256-336). The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Blackwell. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470670606spa
dc.relation.referencesSennet, J. F. (Ed.). (1998). The Analytic Theist. An Alvin Plantinga Reader. William B. Eerdmans.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilvestre, R., Göcke, B., Béziau, J. y Bilimoria, P. (Eds.). (2020). Be- yond Faith and Rationality: Essays on Logic, Religion and Philosophy. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesStoljar, D. y Damnjanovic, N. (2014). The deflationary theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/truthdeflationary/spa
dc.relation.referencesStump, E. (2009a). Aquina’s metaphysics of the incarnation. En O. D. Crisp (Ed.), A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology (pp. 165-184). T & T Clark.spa
dc.relation.referencesStump, E. (2009b). Atonement according to Aquinas. En M. Rea (Ed.), Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology: Trinity, Incarnation, Atonement. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTajer, D. (2012). Una defensa sistemática del pluralismo lógico. Cuadernos de Filosofía, 58, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.34096/cf.n58.391spa
dc.relation.referencesTaliaferro, C. y Meister, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarski, A. (2000). La concepción semántica de la verdad y los fundamentos de la semántica (M. Bunge, E. O. Colombo, E. Arias y L. Fornasari, Trads.). En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 301-338). Tecnos.spa
dc.relation.referencesToulmin, S. (1970). Scientific theories and scientific myths. En S. Toulmin, R. Hepburn y A. MacIntyre, Metaphysical Beliefs (2.a ed.) (pp. 3-74). Fletcher and Son.spa
dc.relation.referencesToulmin, S., Hepburn, R. y MacIntyre, A. (1970). Metaphysical Beliefs (2.a ed.). Fletcher and Son.spa
dc.relation.referencesTuggy, D. (2003). The unfinished bussiness of Trinitarian theorizing. Religious Studies, 39, 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412503006437spa
dc.relation.referencesVainio, O.-P. (2010). Beyond Fideism: Negotiable Religious Identities. Ashgate Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesVillanueva, L. M. V. (Ed.). (2000). La búsqueda del significado. Tecnos.spa
dc.relation.referencesWainwright, W. J. (2005a). Introduction. En W. J. Wainwright (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (pp. 3-11). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWainwright, W. J. (2005b). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWolterstorff, N. (1992). Is reason enough? En R. D. Geivett y B. Sweetman (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology (pp. 142-149). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWolterstorff, N. (2009). How philosophical theology became possible within the analytic tradition of philosophy. En O. D. Crisp y M. C. Rea (Eds.), Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology (pp. 155-168). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWyatt, J., Pedersen, N. J. L. L. y Kellen, N. (Eds.). (2018). Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. Palgrave Macmillan.spa
dc.subjectFilosofía, Teología, Encarnación, Dialetheismo, Divinización, Lógica, Contradicciónspa
dc.subjectFilosofíaspa
dc.subjectTeologíaspa
dc.subjectEncarnaciónspa
dc.subjectDialetheismospa
dc.subjectDivinizaciónspa
dc.subjectLógicaspa
dc.subjectContradicciónspa
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophyspa
dc.subject.keywordsTheologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsIncarnationspa
dc.subject.keywordsDialetheismspa
dc.subject.keywordsDivinizationspa
dc.subject.keywordsLogicspa
dc.subject.keywordsContradictionspa
dc.titleDivino y humano. Contradicción, lógica y racionalidad de la doctrina de la encarnaciónspa
dc.title.translatedDivine and human. Contradiction, logic and rationality of the doctrine of the incarnationspa
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/book
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localLibro completospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Libro.pdf
Tamaño:
2.51 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Divino y humano. Contradicción, lógica y racionalidad de la doctrina de la encarnación
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Portada.jpg
Tamaño:
129.35 KB
Formato:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.95 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Libros de investigación