Divino y humano. Contradicción, lógica y racionalidad de la doctrina de la encarnación
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez Gutiérrez, Susana | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Gómez Gutiérrez, Susana [0000-0002-3539-1545] | spa |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-05T16:08:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-05T16:08:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | El objetivo de este libro es defender la plausibilidad de una aproximación dialetheista a uno de los principales dogmas del cristianismo, la doctrina de la encarnación, según la cual Jesucristo es verdaderamente divino y verdaderamen te humano. La autora sostiene que, de ser esta una teoría dialetheista o contradictoria –y desde su punto de vista hay razones para pensar que lo es–, no se desprendería de ello ningún problema lógico o epistemológico que pudiera afectarla. Para demostrarlo, se propone responder a dos objeciones que se han hecho o podrían hacerse a una postura de esta índole. La primera es la objeción lógica, que en realidad son dos: la de la ilogicidad y la del absurdo lógico. La segunda, que ella ha llamado objeción epistemológica, apunta al hecho de que, de ser una contradicción genuina, la doctrina sería irracional. Su respuesta a estas objeciones está basada en los trabajos de notables autores contemporáneos, como Graham Priest, Jc Beall y James Anderson. | spa |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | The objective of this book is to defend the plausibility of a dialetheist approach to one of the central dogmas of Christianity, the doctrine of the incarnation, according to which Jesus Christ is truly divine and truly human. The author maintains that if this doctrine were a dialetheist or contradictory theory – and, from her perspective, there are reasons to think it is – no logical or epistemological problems would arise that could affect it. To demonstrate this, she proposes to respond to two objections that have been made or could be made to a position of this kind. The first is the logical objection, which is actually two: that of illogicality and that of logical absurdity. The second, which she has called the epistemological objection, points to the fact that the doctrine would be irrational if it were a genuine contradiction. Her response to these objections is based on the works of notable contemporary authors, such as Graham Priest, Jc Beall, and James Anderson. | spa |
| dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-958-739-358-3 | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/11660 | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.publisher.grantor | Universidad El Bosque | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Acero, J. J. (2011). Analytic philosophy as metaphilosophy. Teorema, 30(1), 65-75. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Amesbury, R. (2016). Fideism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fideism | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Anderson, J. (2007). Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status. Wipf and Stock. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Arendzen, J. (1909). Docetae. New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05070c.htm | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Asenjo, F. G. (1966). A calculus of antinomies. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 7(1), 103-105. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Asenjo, F. G. y Tamburino, J. (1975). Logic of antinomies. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 16(1), 17-44. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bäck, A. T. (1997). On Reduplication: Logical Theories of Qualification. E. J. Brill. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Barry, W. (1907). Arianism. New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01707c.htm | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2004). True and false–As if. En G. Priest, J. C. Beall y B. Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (pp. 197-216). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2009). Spandrels of Truth. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2015). Free of detachment: Logic, rationality and gluts. Noûs, 49(2), 410-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12029 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2018). The simple argument for subclassical logic. Philosophical Issues, 28, 30-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12133 Beall, J. C. (2019a). Christ, a contradiction: A defense of contra- dictory christology. Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 400-433. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.090202010411 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2019b). The Contradictory Christ: A Short Sketch on the What? How? and Why? [conferencia]. Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology, University of St. Andrews. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2019c). On contradictory christology: A reply to Cotnoir’s «On the role of Logic». Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 529-543. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2019-7.113106106105108115 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. (2021). The Contradictory Christ. Oxford University Press. Beall, J. C., Glanzberg, M. y Ripley, D. (2017). Liar paradox. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liar-paradox/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. y Logan, S. A. (2017). Logic: The Basics (2.a ed.). Routledge. Beall, J. C. y Restall, G. (2000). Logical pluralism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78, 475-493. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Beall, J. C. y Restall, G. (2006). Logical Pluralism. Clarendon Press. Beall, J. C., Restall, G. y Sagi, G. (2019). Logical consequence. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archi- ves/spr2019/ entries/logical-consequence/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Berto, F. (2007). How to Sell a Contradiction: The Logic and Metaphysics of Inconsistency, vol. 6. College Publications. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bobenrieth, A. (1996). ¿Inconsistencias: por qué no? Un estudio filosófico sobre la lógica paraconsistente. Colcultura. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Boccardi, E. y Macías-Bustos, M. (2017). Contradictions in motion: Why they’re not needed and why they wouldn’t help. Humana.Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 32, 195-227. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Coakley, S. (2002). What does Chalcedon solve and what does it not? Some reflections on the status and meaning of the Chalcedonian «definition». En S. T. Davis, D. Kendall y G. O’Collins (Eds.), The Incarnation (pp. 143-163). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Cotnoir, A. J. (2019). On the role of logic in analytic theology: Exploring the wider context of Beall’s philosophy of logic. Journal of Analytic Theology, 7, 508-524. https//doi.org/10.12978/ jat.2019-7.00-51-51021417 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Crisp, O. D. (2009a). Introduction. En O. D. Crisp (Ed.), A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology (pp. 1-8). T & T Clark. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Crisp, O. D. (Ed.). (2009b). A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology. T & T Clark. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Crisp, O. D. y Rea, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Crombie, I. M. (1964). Theology and falsification. En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. 109-130). The Macmillan Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Cross, R. (2009). The incarnation. En T. P. Flint y M. C. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (pp. 452-475). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Crossley, J. y Dummett, M. (Eds.). (1965). Formal Systems and Recursive Functions. North-Holland Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Dahms, J. V. (1978). How reliable is logic? Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 21(4), 369-380. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | David, M. (2016). The correspondence theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ fall2016/entries/ truth-correspondence/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Davis, S. T. (1983). Logic and the Nature of God. William B. Eerdmans. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Davis, S. T., Kendall, D. y O’Collins, G. (Eds.). (2002). The Incarnation. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Denzinger, E. (1963). El magisterio de la Iglesia. Manual de los símbolos, definiciones y declaraciones de la Iglesia en materia de fe y costumbres. (D. R. Bueno, Trad.). Herder. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Evans, C. S. (1998). Faith beyond Reason. Edinburgh University Press. Evans, C. S. (2006a). Kenotic christology and the nature of God. En C. S. Evans (Ed.), Exploring Kenotic Christology (pp. 190-217). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Evans, C. S. (Ed.). (2006b). Exploring Kenotic Christology. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Evans, E. (1956). Tertullian’s Treatise on the Incarnation. Wipf and Stock. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Feenstra, R. J. (2006). A kenotic christology of the divine attributes. En C. S. Evans (Ed.), Exploring Kenotic Christology (pp. 139-164). Oxford University Press | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Fergusson, D. (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth-Century Theology. Wiley-Blackwell. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Flew, A., Hare, R. y Mitchell, B. (1964). Theology and falsification. En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. 96-108). The Macmillan Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Flew, A. y MacIntyre, A. (Eds.). (1964a). New Essays in Philosophical Theology. The Macmillan Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Flew, A. y MacIntyre, A. (1964b). Preface. En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. vii-x). The Macmillan Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Flint, T. P. y Rea, M. (2009a). Introduction. En T. P. Flint y M. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (pp. 1-7). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Flint, T. P. y Rea, M. (Eds.). (2009b). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Fogelin, R. J. (2019). La lógica de los desacuerdos profundos (D. M. Saldarriaga, Trad.). Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 19, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.15366/ria2019.19 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Forero, J. A. (2018). La concepción semántica de la verdad: Correspondencia y lenguajes naturales (inédito). | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829-839. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Frege, G. (1998). Función y concepto (1891). En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), Ensayos de semántica y filosofía de la lógica (pp. 53-79). Tecnos. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Garrido, M. (2004). Ensayo preliminar. En D. Hume, Diálogos sobre la religión natural (pp. 13-61). Tecnos. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Geivett, R. D. y Sweetman, B. (Eds.). (1992). Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gier, N. F. (1987). God, Reason and the Evangelicals: Case against Evan- gelical Rationalism. University Press of America. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gómez, S. (2016). Contradicciones y racionalidad: Susana y los vie- jos jueces y la resurrección de Jesús, un estudio de casos. En J. A. F. Mora (Ed.), Racionalidad, lenguaje y acción, aproximaciones analíticas (pp. 109-130). Uniminuto. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gómez, S. (2017). Algunos supuestos lógicos en el pensamiento de Kierkegaard y el carácter existencial de la fe. En R. Meléndez, L. F. Múnera y C. M. Gómez (Eds.), ¿Ciencia o religión? Exploraciones sobre las relaciones entre fe y racionalidad en el mundo contemporáneo (pp. 119-139). Editorial Universidad del Rosario; Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Gómez, S. (2020). Contradictions and rationality. An analysis of two biblical cases. En R. Silvestre, B. Göcke, J. Béziau y P. Bilimoria (Eds.), Beyond Faith and Rationality. Essays on Logic, Religion and Philosophy. Springer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Graham, G. (2010). Atonement. En C. Taliaferro y C. Meister (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology (pp. 124-135). Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Grim, P. (2004). What is a contradiction? En G. Priest, J. C. Beall y B. P. Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (pp. 49-72). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Haack, S. (1996). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. The University of Chicago Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Haack, S. (1998). Filosofia das Lógicas (C. A. Mortari y L. H. Dutra, Trads.). Unesp. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. mit Press. Hasker, W. (2005). Analitic philosophy of religion. En W. J. Wainwright (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (pp. 421-446). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hempel, C. G. (2000). Problemas y cambios en el criterio empirista del significado (M. Bunge, E. O. Colombo, E. Arias y L. Fornasari, Trads.). En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 227-246). Tecnos. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hick, J. (Ed.). (2011). Faith and the Philosophers. Palgrave Macmillan. Hunter, G. (1973). Metalogic: Introduction to the Metatheory of Standard First Order Logic. University of California Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Jenson, R. (2009). Ipse Pater Non Est Impassibilis. En J. F. Keating y T. J. White (Eds.), Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering (pp. 117-126). William B. Eerdmans. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Keating, J. F. y White, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. William B. Eerdmans. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kierkegaard, S. (2007). Migajas filosóficas o un poco de filosofía (R. Larrañeta, Ed. y Trad.). Trotta. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Ejercitación del cristianismo (D. G. Rivero, Trad.). Trotta. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kripke, S. (1965). Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic i. En J. Crossley y M. Dummett (Eds.), Formal Systems and Recursive Functions (pp. 92-130). North-Holland Publishing Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kripke, S. (1975). Outline of a theory of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 690-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024634 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Law, D. R. (2010). Kenotic christology. En D. Fergusson (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth-Century Theology (pp. 251- 279). Wiley-Blackwell. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Law, D. R. (2013). Kierkegaard’s Kenotic Christology. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Loux, M. J. y Zimmerman, D. W. (2003a). Introduction. En M. J. Loux y D. W. Zimmerman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (pp. 1-7). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Loux, M. J. y Zimmerman, D. W. (Eds.). (2003b). The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | MacIntyre, A. (1970). The logical status of religious belief. En S. Toulmin, R. Hepburn y A. MacIntyre, Metaphysical Beliefs (2.a ed.) (pp. 157-201). Fletcher and Son. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | MacIntyre, A. (2011). Is understanding religion compatible with be- lieving? En J. Hick (Ed.), Faith and the Philosophers (pp. 115-133). Palgrave Macmillan. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Malcolm, N. (1992). The groundlessness of belief. En R. D. Geivett y B. Sweetman (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology (pp. 92-103). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Manzano, M. y Alonzo, E. (2010). Nociones de completud. Epistemens, 30(1), 51-84. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mares, E. D. (2004). Semantic dialetheism. En G. Priest, J. Beall y B. Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (pp. 264-275). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Martínez-Ordaz, M. (2021). Is Christ really contradictory? Some methodological concerns from the philosophy of science. Manuscrito, 44(4), 313-339. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.V44N4.MO | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Meléndez, R., Múnera, L. F. y Gómez, C. M. (Eds.). (2017). ¿Ciencia o religión? Exploraciones sobre las relaciones entre fe y racionalidad en el mundo contemporáneo. Editorial Universidad del Rosario; Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Michon, C. (2010). Preface: Approches contemporaines. En C. Michon y R. Pouivet (Eds.), Philosophie de la religion (pp. 7-38). Vrin. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Michon, C. y Pouivet, R. (Eds.). (2010). Philosophie de la religion. Vrin. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mora, J. A. F. (Ed.). (2016). Racionalidad, lenguaje y acción, aproximaciones analíticas. Uniminuto. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Morris, T. V. (2001). The Logic of God Incarnate. Wipf and Stock. Moschovakis, J. (2002). Intuitionistic logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/ entries/logic-intuitionistic/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mueller, S. P. (2011). Docetism. The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670606. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mulligan, K., Simons, P. y Smith, B. (1984). Truth-makers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44(3), 287-321. https://doi. org/10.2307/2107686 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Need, S. W. (2008). Truly Divine and Truly Human: The Story of Christ and the Seven Ecumenical Councils. spCk; Hendrickson. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | O’Collins, G. (2002). The incarnation: The critical issues. En S. T. Davis, D. Kendall y G. O’Collins (Eds.), The Incarnation (pp. 1-27). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Páramo, G. (1989). Lógica de los mitos: Lógica paraconsistente. Una alternativa en la discusión sobre la lógica del mito. Ideas y Valores, 38(79), 27-67. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Pawl, T. (2016). In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Es- say. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Pelikan, J. (1971). The Christian Tradition: The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition, vol. 1. The University of Chicago Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Peña, L. (1981). La coincidencia de los opuestos en Dios. Ediciones de la Universidad Católica. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Pérez, A. (2017). Argumentando Dios desde la filosofía analítica. Cracovia, Oxford y los comienzos de una nueva disciplina. Teología y Ciencia, 9, 68-87. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Pérez, A. (2018). Méta-theologie analytique. Scientia et Fides, 6. Plantinga, A. (1993a). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Plantinga, A. (1993b). Warrant: The Current Dabate. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Plantinga, A. (1998). Christian philosophy at the end of the twentieth century. En J. F. Sennet (Ed.), The Analytic Theist. An Alvin Plantinga Reader. William B. Eerdmans. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. (1979). The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 219-241. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. (2006a). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. (2006b). In Contradiction (2.a ed.). Clarendon Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. (2008). An Introduction to Non-Classical Logics. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. (2017). Things are not what they seem. En M. Silva (Ed.), How Colours Matter to Philosophy (pp. 225-236). Springer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. (2019). A note on mathematical pluralism and logical pluralism. Synthese, 198 (Suppl 20), 4937-4946. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11229-019-02292-9 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G., Beall, J. C. y Armour-Garb, B. P. (Eds.). (2004). The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G., Berto, F. y Weber, Z. (2018). Dialetheism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ dialetheism/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G. y Routley, R. (1989). Systems of paraconsistent logic. En G. Priest, R. Routley y J. Norman (Eds.), Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent (pp. 151-186). Philosophia Verlag. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G., Routley, R. y Norman, J. (Eds.). (1989). Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent. Philosophia Verlag. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Priest, G., Tanaka, K. y Weber, Z. (2018). Paraconsistent logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/sum2018/entries/logic-paraconsistent/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Prior, A. N. (1964). Can religion be discussed? En A. Flew y A. MacIntyre (Eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (pp. 1-11). The Macmillan Company. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Quine, W. V. (1998). Filosofía de la lógica. Alianza. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Quine, W. V. (2000). Dos dogmas del empirismo. En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 247-270). Tecnos | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Rea, M. (Ed.). (2009). Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology: Trinity, Incarnation, Atonement. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Restall, G. (2002). Carnap’s tolerance, meaning and logical pluralism. The Journal of Philosophy, 99(8), 426-443. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Russell, G. (2019). Logical pluralism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-pluralism/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Schmidt, A. F. (2011). Arius (c 256-336). The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Blackwell. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470670606 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sennet, J. F. (Ed.). (1998). The Analytic Theist. An Alvin Plantinga Reader. William B. Eerdmans. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Silvestre, R., Göcke, B., Béziau, J. y Bilimoria, P. (Eds.). (2020). Be- yond Faith and Rationality: Essays on Logic, Religion and Philosophy. Springer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Stoljar, D. y Damnjanovic, N. (2014). The deflationary theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/truthdeflationary/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Stump, E. (2009a). Aquina’s metaphysics of the incarnation. En O. D. Crisp (Ed.), A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology (pp. 165-184). T & T Clark. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Stump, E. (2009b). Atonement according to Aquinas. En M. Rea (Ed.), Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology: Trinity, Incarnation, Atonement. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Tajer, D. (2012). Una defensa sistemática del pluralismo lógico. Cuadernos de Filosofía, 58, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.34096/cf.n58.391 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Taliaferro, C. y Meister, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Tarski, A. (2000). La concepción semántica de la verdad y los fundamentos de la semántica (M. Bunge, E. O. Colombo, E. Arias y L. Fornasari, Trads.). En L. M. V. Villanueva (Ed.), La búsqueda del significado (pp. 301-338). Tecnos. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Toulmin, S. (1970). Scientific theories and scientific myths. En S. Toulmin, R. Hepburn y A. MacIntyre, Metaphysical Beliefs (2.a ed.) (pp. 3-74). Fletcher and Son. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Toulmin, S., Hepburn, R. y MacIntyre, A. (1970). Metaphysical Beliefs (2.a ed.). Fletcher and Son. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Tuggy, D. (2003). The unfinished bussiness of Trinitarian theorizing. Religious Studies, 39, 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412503006437 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Vainio, O.-P. (2010). Beyond Fideism: Negotiable Religious Identities. Ashgate Publishing. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Villanueva, L. M. V. (Ed.). (2000). La búsqueda del significado. Tecnos. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wainwright, W. J. (2005a). Introduction. En W. J. Wainwright (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (pp. 3-11). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wainwright, W. J. (2005b). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wolterstorff, N. (1992). Is reason enough? En R. D. Geivett y B. Sweetman (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology (pp. 142-149). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wolterstorff, N. (2009). How philosophical theology became possible within the analytic tradition of philosophy. En O. D. Crisp y M. C. Rea (Eds.), Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology (pp. 155-168). Oxford University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Wyatt, J., Pedersen, N. J. L. L. y Kellen, N. (Eds.). (2018). Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. Palgrave Macmillan. | spa |
| dc.subject | Filosofía, Teología, Encarnación, Dialetheismo, Divinización, Lógica, Contradicción | spa |
| dc.subject | Filosofía | spa |
| dc.subject | Teología | spa |
| dc.subject | Encarnación | spa |
| dc.subject | Dialetheismo | spa |
| dc.subject | Divinización | spa |
| dc.subject | Lógica | spa |
| dc.subject | Contradicción | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Philosophy | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Theology | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Incarnation | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Dialetheism | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Divinization | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Logic | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Contradiction | spa |
| dc.title | Divino y humano. Contradicción, lógica y racionalidad de la doctrina de la encarnación | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Divine and human. Contradiction, logic and rationality of the doctrine of the incarnation | spa |
| dc.type.coar | https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33 | |
| dc.type.coarversion | https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/book | |
| dc.type.hasversion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type.local | Libro completo | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- Libro.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 2.51 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Divino y humano. Contradicción, lógica y racionalidad de la doctrina de la encarnación
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Portada.jpg
- Tamaño:
- 129.35 KB
- Formato:
- Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
- Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 1.95 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción: