Análisis del discurso aplicado a la enseñanza del inglés en contextos colombianos: teoría y métodos

dc.contributor.authorEscobar Alméciga, Wilder Yesid
dc.contributor.authorEscobar Alméciga, Wilder Yesid
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda-Peña, Harold
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda-Peña, Harold
dc.contributor.authorLucero, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorLucero, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorGómez Lobatón, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorGómez Lobatón, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorCaviedes, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorCaviedes, Lorena
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-15T13:52:21Z
dc.date.available2020-05-15T13:52:21Z
dc.date.copyright2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractAlejándose de las visiones instrumentales del lenguaje, este libro ubica la enseñanza y el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera en un espectro más amplio de dinámicas discursivas elaboradas socioculturalmente. Para abordar esta compleja perspectiva, presenta cinco estudios de discurso basados en diversas metodologías, a fin de suscitar consideraciones más profundas sobre la enseñanza y el aprendizaje del inglés en los contextos colombianos. Asimismo, ilustra la construcción de una comunidad académica en la que instituciones, investigadores y estudiantes se reúnen para indagar, comprender y compartir sus hallazgos sobre la enseñanza y el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera en Colombia.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishBy moving away from instrumental views of language, the book Discourse Analysis Applied to English Language Teaching in Colombian Contexts: Theory and Methods situates the teaching and learning of English as a foreign language along a broader spectrum of socio-culturally elaborated discursive dynamics. To offer this complex and multifaceted perspective, it presents five discourse studies informed by diverse methodologies, and aims to provoke further and deeper considerations around the issue of English teaching and learning in Colombian contexts. Similarly, this work also exemplifies academic community building where different institutions, researchers and students have partnered to inquire into, understand, and share their findings regarding EFL teaching and learning in Colombia.eng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-739-061-2
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquespa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2821
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquespa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities ´A Brilliant Exegesis on Nationalism´. (Third ed.). New York, London: Verson: New Left Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesAppel, G., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 437-452. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/328583spa
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda, A. (2012). EFL Women-Learners’ Construction of the Discourse of Egalitarianism and Knowledge in Online-Talk-in-Interaction. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1) 163-179.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda-Peña, H. (2012). Profiling academic research on discourse studies and second language learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1) 9-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesChapetón Castro, C. M. (2009). The Use and Functions of Discourse Markers in EFL Classroom Interaction. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, (11) 57-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesClark, J. B. (2010). Multilingualism, citizenship and identity: Voices of youth and symbolic investments in an urban, globalized world. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W. Y. (2013). Identity-Forming Discourses: A Critical Discourse Analysis on Policy Making Processes Concerning English Language Teaching in Colombia. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 15(1) 45-60.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, W., & Gómez, J. (2010). Silenced fighters: Identity, language and thought of the Nasa people in bilingual contexts of Colombia. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(1), 125-140.spa
dc.relation.referencesFairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoucault, M. (1988). “Technologies of the Self.” In L. Martin, H. Gutman and P.H. Hutton. Amherst (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.spa
dc.relation.referencesGee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London, UK: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez Lobatón, J. C. (2012). Language learners’ identities in EFL settings: resistance and power through discourse. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1) 60-76.spa
dc.relation.referencesJørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaloof Avendaño, C. E. & Housset Fonseca, M. (2009). Use of discourse analysis to enhance students’ critical thinking skills. Zona Próxima, (10) 36-49.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R., Malancharuvin-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. (2005). Critical Discourse Analysis in Education: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, (3) 65-416.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoler, S. (2012). Between Dark Black and Light Brown. Discourses and Ethnic Identities among Afrodescendant Boys and Girls in School Context in Bogotá. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1) 146-162.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-283.spa
dc.relation.referencesVargas Torres, M. R. (2010). Towards a Discourse for Criticism in Language Teaching: Analysis of Sociocultural Representations in Mass Media. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(2) 179-190. Recuperado de https://estudiosterritoriales.org/articulo.oa?id=169215620012spa
dc.relation.referencesBellack, A., Kliebard, H., Hyman, R., & Smith, F. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlackbourn-Brockman, E. (2001). Investigating the role gender plays in adolescents’ writing processes and products. WILLA, (10), 27-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesCazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Postmouth, NH: Heinemann.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis. London: Continuum.spa
dc.relation.referencesDerrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDobinson, T. (2001). Do learners learn from classroom interaction and does the teacher have a role to play? Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 189-211.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuff, P. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289-332.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesFairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlynn, E. (1988). Composing as a woman. College Composition and Communication, 39 (2), 432-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. London: Penguin Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, J., & Dixon, C. (2002). Exploring differences in perspective on microanalysis of classroom discourse: Contributions and concerns. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 393-406.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 222-245). London: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.) Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp 268-85). Rowley: Newbury House.spa
dc.relation.referencesLyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesMehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 323-347.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunn, R. (2001). Language learning across boundaries: Negotiating classroom rituals. TESL-EJ Journal, 5(2), 1-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesPotter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally-occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 200-221). London: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesRampton, B., Roberts, C., Leung, C., & Harris, R. (2002). Methodology in the analysis of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 373-392.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeedhouse, P. (1995). L2 classroom transcripts: Data in search of a methodology? TESL-EJ Journal, 1(4), 1-37.spa
dc.relation.referencesSheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300.spa
dc.relation.referencesSinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrike, K. A. (1974). On the expressive potential of behaviorist language. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 103-120.spa
dc.relation.referencesTannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand. Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: Ballantine.spa
dc.relation.referencesTannen, D. (1994). Genero y discurso, Barcelona: Paidós.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Dijk, T. (1981). Discourse studies and education. Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-26.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoung, R., & Nguyen, H. (2002). Modes of meaning in high school science. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 348-372.spa
dc.relation.referencesZuengler, J., & Mori, J. (2002). Microanalyses of classroom discourse: A critical consideration of method. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 283-288.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmaya, L. F. (2008). Teaching culture: is it possible to avoid pragmatic failure? Revista alicantina de estudios ingleses, (21), 11-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesAridah, A. (2010). Politeness Phenomena as a Source of Pragmatic Failure in English as a Second Language. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English. 12 (2).spa
dc.relation.referencesBachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBassols, M. (2003). Pragmatics and discourse analysis. Noves SL. Revista de Sociolingüística, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www6.gencat.net/llengcat/noves/hm03hivern/a_bassols1_3.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesBardovi-Harlig, Kathleen (1992): “Pragmatics as Part of Teacher Education.” TESOL Journal, 1(1), 28-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorg, E. (2003). Discourse community. ELT Journal, 57(4), 398-400. doi: 10.1093/elt/57.4.398spa
dc.relation.referencesBortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123-147.spa
dc.relation.referencesBreeze, R. (2011). Disciplinary values in legal discourse: a corpus study. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), (21), 93-115.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. (14th ed.). London, England: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesByon, Andrew S. (2005): “Teaching Refusals in Korean.” The Korean Language in America 10: 1-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesCanale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (eds.)spa
dc.relation.referencesCanale, M. (1988). The measurement of communicative competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 8, 67-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, L. (1999). Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In L.Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 105– 132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, L. (2006). MetNet Group: e MetaphorAnalysis Project. Retrieved from https://creet.open.ac.uk/projects/metaphoranalysis/index.cfmspa
dc.relation.referencesCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approach to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. doi: 10.1093/applin/I.1.1spa
dc.relation.referencesChapetón, C. M. (2010). Identificación de Lenguaje Metafórico en textos argumentativos en inglés como lengua extranjera: un estudio de corpus. Folios: revista de la Facultad de Humanidades, (32), 125-140.spa
dc.relation.referencesChomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00001515spa
dc.relation.referencesCrystal, D. (2008). A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. In D. Crystal (Ed.), (6th ed., pp. 1-555). Blackwell Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavies, Mark. (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available online at https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelahaie, J. (2011, April). Sociopragmatic competence in ffl language teaching: discourse markers as contextualization cues. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 Atelier afls, Bristol. doi: halshs-00689854spa
dc.relation.referencesDiemer, S. (2009). Corpus linguistics with google? Saarland University. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/isle/files/2012/01/Stefan-Diemer-Corpus-Linguistics-with-Google.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDippold, D. (2008). Reframing one’s experience: Face, identity and roles in l2 argumentative discourse. In M. Pütz & J. Neff-van (Eds.), Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross-Cultural Pragmatics (pp. 131 - 154). Mouton de Gruyter.spa
dc.relation.referencesDubroca Galin, D. (2013). Traduction économique en français et en espagnol ou comment rentabiliser le réseau Internet par le biais de corpus (méthodes et applications). Çedille. Revista de Estudios Franceses, (9) 547-550.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W. Y. & Gómez Lobatón, J. C. (2010). Silenced Fighters: Identity, Language and Thought of the Nasa People in Bilingual Contexts of Colombia. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(1) 125-140.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W. Y. (2013a). Identity-Forming Discourses: A Critical Discourse Analysis on Policy Making Processes Concerning English Language Teaching in Colombia. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 15(1) 45-60.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W. Y. (2013b). A Socio-cognitive Approach to English language learning. In W. Escobar (Ed.), Social Research Applied to English Language Teaching in Colombian Contexts: Theory and Methods (pp. 15-20). Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Universidad El Bosque.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W., Arias, L., Vinck, K. (2013) Corpus of EFL learners (EFLLC): 114.000 words (Unpublished)spa
dc.relation.referencesFish, S. (1976). Interpreting the “variorum.” Chicago Journals, 2(3), 465-485. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1342862spa
dc.relation.referencesFish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGumperz, J. J. (2001). The speech community. Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 66-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldstein, B. (2009). New Framework: Starter Student´s Book. (1st ed.). Spain: Santillana Educación S.L., Richmond Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoldstein, B., Metcalf, R., Holley, G., and Norris, L. (2009). New Framework: advanced Student´s Book. (1st ed.). Spain: Santillana Educación S.L., Richmond Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, P. S. (2002). The usage of amount, quantity and body in a corpus of biology. IBÉRICA, 4, 113-127.spa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera, S. (2008). A metaphor corpus in business press headlines. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), (15), 51-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, J. (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. New York: Longman Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesHouse, J. and G. Kasper. (1981). ‘Politeness markers in English and German’ in F. Coulmas (ed.). Conversational/tourine (157-86). The Hague: Mouton.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohns, A. M. (1997). Text Role and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesJudd, Elliot L. (1999): “Some Issues in the Teaching of Pragmatic Competence.” In E. Hinkel, ed., Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152-166.spa
dc.relation.referencesKasper, G. (1982). Teaching-induced aspects of interlanguage discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(02), 99-113.spa
dc.relation.referencesKasper, G. (1997). Can Pragmatic Competence be Taught? (NetWorks No. 6). Honolulu: University of Hawaii. Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved November 3, 2013 from: https://www.lll.hawaii.edu/nflrc/NetWorks/NW6/spa
dc.relation.referencesKawecki, R., & Lorient, F. (2009) Teaching and learning French with the help of a French Caribbean corpus.spa
dc.relation.referencesKelly, E. C. (2004). Pragmatic competence and failure in the Japanese university EFL classroom. 文京学院大学外国語学部文京学院短期大学紀要, (3), 17-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeech, G., & Thomas, J. (1990). Language, meaning and context: pragmatics. In N.Collinge (Ed.), An encyclopaedia of language. London, England: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, H. (2006). An Exploratory Study of Interlanguage Pragmatic Development. (Master Thesis, National University of Defense Technology, 2006). Retrieved April 8, 2009, from: https://www.lunwenjia.com/zhongguoyuyan/222603.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, J. (2004). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Available from City U. Institutional Repository. Retrieved from https://lbms03.cityu.edu.hk/theses/abt/phd-en-b18713191a.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMartinez, M. (2011). A corpus-based approach to gerundial and infinitival complementation in Spanish esl writing. (Master’s thesis), Available from UNT Digital Library. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc68011/spa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, C. F. (2006). Corpus Linguistics, the World Wide Web, and English Language Teaching. Ibérica, (12) 9-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. [MEN] (2014). Colombia Very Well! Programa Naional de Ingles 2015-2025. Retrieved July 28, 2015 from https://www.colombiaaprende.edu.spa
dc.relation.referencesMirzaei, A., Roohani, A., & Esmaeili, M. (2012). Exploring Pragmalinguistic and Sociopragmatic Variability in Speech Act Production of L2 Learners and Native Speakers. Journal of Teaching Language Skills. 4(3), 79-102.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiezgoda, K., & Röver, C. (2001). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of the learning environment. Pragmatics in language teaching, 63-79.spa
dc.relation.referencesPatiño García, P. (2013). FTA Corpus: a parallel corpus of English and Spanish Free Trade Agreements for the study of specialized collocations. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 3(1). Business terminology and phraseology corpus.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiqué-Angordans, J. (2006). Summary of “Corpus Linguistics Applications for the Study of English” de Ana María Hornero, María José Luzón & Silvia Murillo (eds.). Ibérica, (12), 163-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorter, J. E. (1986). Intertextuality and the Discourse Community. Rhetoric Review. 5/I: 34-47.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrior, P. (2003). Are communities of practice really an alternative to discourse communities? In meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Arlington, VA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRayson, P. (2009) Wmatrix: a web-based corpus processing environment, Computing Department, Lancaster University. https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/spa
dc.relation.referencesRayson, P. (2003). Matrix: A statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison (Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University)spa
dc.relation.referencesRecski, L. J. (2006). Corpus linguistics at the service of English Teachers. Literatura y Lingüística, (17) 303-324.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoger, S. (1999). A history of language. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesSavignon, S. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 261-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. (3rd- ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesSearle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesScott, M. (2012). Looking back or looking forward in corpus linguistics: What can the last 20 years suggest about the next? Ibérica, (24) 75-85. Recovered from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287024476007spa
dc.relation.referencesSwales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwales, J. (2004). Then and now: A reconsideration of the first corpus of scientific English. Ibérica, (8) 5-21. Recovered from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287026422002spa
dc.relation.referencesTaguchi, N. (2009). Pragmatic competence. New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.spa
dc.relation.referencesTello, L.Y. (2006). Análisis Contrastivo e Interlingüístico de Peticiones en Inglés y Español. Íkala, (11 (1)), 89-116.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas, J. (1983). Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied linguistics. 4(2), 91-112.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrosborg, A. (Ed.). (2010). Pragmatics across languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeliz, M. (2008). “La lingüística del corpus y la enseñanza del Inglés (como lengua extranjera): Un matrimonio forzado?” Literatura y lingüística, No. 19 Universidad Catolica de Chile. Recoveredspa
dc.relation.referencesViana, V. (2006). Modals in Brazilian Advanced EFL Learners’ Compositions: A Corpus-Based Investigation. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, (7) 77-86. Recovered from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169213802006spa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWu, C. (2009). Corpus-based research. In M. Halliday & J. Webster (Eds.), An Introduction to Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.128-142) New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesXiaole, G. (2009). A Study of Interrelations Between Sociopragmatic and Linguistic Competences. Intercultural Communication Studies, 18(1), 237.spa
dc.relation.referencesZeng, X. M. (2006). A Study on Chinese EFL Learners Interlanguage Pragmatic Competence in the Speech Act of Apology. (Master Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006).spa
dc.relation.referencesAllwright, D. (1984). Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach? - The Interaction Hypothesis. In Singleton and Little (eds), Language Learning in Formal and Informal Contexts (pp. 3-18), Dublin: BAAL/IRAAL.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaxter, J. (2002). Competing discourses in the classroom: a post-structuralist discourse analysis of girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts, in Discourse and Society 13 (6), 827-842.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaxter, J. (2003). Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, D. (2001a). What is discourse and why to analyze it? In Working with Spoken Discourse, London: Sage, 7-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron, D. (2001b). Sequence and structure: Conversation Analysis. In Working with Spoken Discourse, London: Sage, 87-105.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University  Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring Language Pedagogy Through Second Language Acquisition Research. NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesFairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. USA: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesGass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.). (1996). Second Language Classroom Research: Issues and Opportunities. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbons, P. (2006). Bridging Discourses in the ESL Classroom. New York: Continuun.spa
dc.relation.referencesHalliday, M.A. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. Michigan: University Park Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesJakobson, R. (1982). Verbal Art, Serbal Sign, Verbal Time. USA: University of Minnesota.spa
dc.relation.referencesJackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, K. (1995). Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesKurhila, S. (2006). Second Language Interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesLabov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. USA: University of Pennsilvania Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M.L. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesLewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach. London: Language Teaching Publications, Commercial Colour Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLightbown, P. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences. In H. Seliger and M. Long (Eds.), Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 217-243). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. R. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. and Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and Functions of teachers’ questions. In H. Seliger and M. Long (Eds.), Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucero, E. (2011). Code switching to know a TL equivalent of an L1 word: Request-Provision-Acknowledgement (RPA) Sequence. How Journal, 18, 58-72.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucero, E. (2012). Asking about Content and Adding Content: Two patterns of classroom interaction. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14 (1), 28-44.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucero, E., Penagos, J., Granados, M. (2006). The Influence of Students’ Spanish Lexicon on English as a Foreign Language Classes. (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation). Universidad de La Salle, Bogota, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesMackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses and Red Herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarkee, N. (2000). Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesReda, M. (2009). Between Speaking and Silence: A Study of Quiet Students. NY: State University of New York Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRitchie, W. & Bathia, T. (Eds.) (2009). The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. UK: Emerald Group Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesRivers, W. (1983). Communicating Naturally in a Second Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Teaching Library: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichmond, V. & McCroskey, J. (Eds.) (1992). Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control, and Concern. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, R. (2004). An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education (2nd ed.). NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchegloff, E. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech acts theory to ordinary conversation, Journal of Pragmatics 12, 55-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchegloff, E. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational Organization and its Development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchegloff, E. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165-187.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchegloff, E. (2000). When others initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21 (2), 205-243.spa
dc.relation.referencesSearle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeedhouse, P. (2004a). Conversation Analysis as Research Methodology. In J. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applied Conversation Analysis (pp. 251-266). NY: Palgrave McMillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeedhouse, P. (2004b). Conversation Analysis Methodology. Language Learning, 54(S1), 1-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeedhouse, P. (2004c). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Madison, USA: Language Learning Monograph Series.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. NY: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStern, H.H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTannen, D. (1982). Analysing Discourse: Text and Talk. USA: Georgetown University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesThornbury, S., & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner. New York: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesWodak, R. & M. Meyer (Eds.) (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesWunderlich, D. (1980). Methodological remarks in Speech Act Theory. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer, & M. Bierwish (Eds.). Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (pp. 290-312). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesAppiah, K.A., Gates, H.L. Jr., (1995). Multiplying identities. In: Identities Ed. Appiah, K.A., Chicago, IL. Univ. Chicago Press. (pp. 1, 6)spa
dc.relation.referencesBakhtin, M.N. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBelsey, C. (1980). Critical Practice. London: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. (Revised edition). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCanagarajah, A. S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601-626.spa
dc.relation.referencesCerulo, A. (1997). Identity construction: new issues, new directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 385-409.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoulthard, M. (1975). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin, N., & Lincoln, I. (Eds.) A handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 509-535) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagespa
dc.relation.referencesChavez, M. (2007). The orientation of learner language use in peer work: teacher role, learner role and individual identity, Language Teaching Research 11, (2), 161-188spa
dc.relation.referencesDuff, P. & Uchida, Y. (1997). The negotiation of teachers’ sociocultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 31 (3), 451-486.spa
dc.relation.referencesEgan-Robertson, A. (1998). Learning about culture, language and power: understanding relationships among personhood, literacy practices and intertexuality. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 449-487.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGaynesford, M. (2009). Illocutionary acts, subordination and silencing. Analysis 69 (3), 488-490.spa
dc.relation.referencesGee, J. (1990). Social Linguistics and literacies. London: Falmer Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGee, J., & Crawford, V. (1998). Two kinds of teenagers: Language, identity and social class. In Alvermann, D., Moore, D., & Waff, D. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives. (pp. 225-246) Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, J. (2012). Language learners’ identities in EFL settings: resistance and power through discourse. CALJ, 24 (1) 60-76.spa
dc.relation.referencesGumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D. and Cain, C. (1998), Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.spa
dc.relation.referencesLe Page, R. (1986). Acts of identity. English Today 8, 21-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesLesser, E. L. & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal 40 (4).spa
dc.relation.referencesLuke, A. (1996). Text and discourse in education: an introduction to critical discourse analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/ pp. 1 - 48.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindsay, A., & Lapadat, J. (1999). Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of technique to interpretive positionings In Qualitative Inquiry; 5 (2) 64-86.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohstone, B. (2008). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. (1999). Critical classroom discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 453-484.spa
dc.relation.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching. From method to postmethod. Constituents and Categories of methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London. pp. 83-96.spa
dc.relation.referencesLuke, A. (1996). “Text and Discourse in Education: An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis.” https://www.jstor.org/ p. 1-48.spa
dc.relation.referencesMackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development. An empirical study of question formation in ESL. SSLA, 21, 557-587.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan, J. (2000). Critical Pedagogy: the spaces that make the difference, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 8, pp. 273-289.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4) 573-603.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorton, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 9-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1998). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaskalev, V. (2011). Review on Group agency. The possibility, design and status of group agents. Oxford University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesPunch, M. (1994). Politics and Ethics in qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. & Nunan, D. (1990). Second Language Teacher Education. Cambridge: London.spa
dc.relation.referencesSinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSunderland, J., and Litosseliti, L. (2002). Gender identity and discourse analysis, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.spa
dc.relation.referencesTudor, I. (2006). Dynamics of Classroom Interaction.spa
dc.relation.referencesTurnbull, M. (2009). First language in second and foreign language learning. London: Multilingual Matters.spa
dc.relation.referencesWallace, M. (1998). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWebb, R. & Sherman, R. (1988). Qualitative research in education: focus and methods. UK: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaxter, J (2003). Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesBourne, J. (2001). Discourses and Identities in a Multi-Lingual Primary Classroom. Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Mar., 2001), pp. 103-114. Available in Jstor. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1050996spa
dc.relation.referencesCastañeda-Peña, H. (2008), “I said it” “I’m first!” Gender and Language Learning Identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. 10. pp. 112-125.spa
dc.relation.referencesCandela, A. (2001) Corrientes teóricas sobre discurso en el Aula. In, Revista Mexicana de Investigación educativa. Vol. 6, No. 12. Available in: https://www.comie.org.mx/revista/Pdfs/Carpeta12/12invest1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCaviedes Cadena, L. (2012). Unveiling Language Learners’ Identities through Peer-Approval Discourses. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeCosta, M., Clifton, J. and Roen, D. (2010). EJ in Focus: Collaboration and Social Interaction in English Classrooms. The English Journal, Vol. 99, No. 5 (May 2010), pp. 14-21. Retrieved from Jstor. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27807184spa
dc.relation.referencesDurán, N. (2006).”Exploring Gender Differences in the EFL Classroom.” Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8. pp. 123-136.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmmerich, R. and Heller, R. (Producers) and Kreuzpaintner, M. (Director) (2007). Trade (Motion Picture). Germany and USA. Lionsgate and Roadside Attractions.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W.Y. and Gómez Lobatón, J.C. (2010) “Silenced Fighters: Identity, Language and Thought of the Nasa People in Bilingual Contexts of Colombia” PROFILE Journal Vol.12 No.1spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Alméciga, W.Y. (2013) “Identity-Forming Discourses: A Critical Discourse Analysis on Policy Making Processes Concerning English Language Teaching in Colombia.” PROFILE Journal Vol.15 No.1. pp. 45-60.spa
dc.relation.referencesGee, J.P. (2010). How to do Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesGravetter, F. and Forzano, L. (2011). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis? Oxon, OX: Routledge Falmer.spa
dc.relation.referencesHalliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London, UK: Edward Arnold.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenderson, J. G., Hawthorne, R. D. and Stollenwerk, D.A. (2000). Transformative Curriculum Leadership (2nd Ed.). Michigan University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHudak, G. and Kihn, P. (2001) Labeling: Pedagogy and Politics. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.spa
dc.relation.referencesKendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKielhofner, G. (2007). Model of Human Occupation Theory and Application (4th Ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins: a Walters Kluwer business.spa
dc.relation.referencesLantolf, P. and Appel, G. (1994, Winter). Speaking as Mediation: A Study of L1 and L2 Text Recall Tasks. The Modern Language Journal. Vol. 78, No 4. pp. 437 – 452. Retrieved from www.Jstor.org.spa
dc.relation.referencesLave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy, C. and Crichlow, W. (1993). “Theories of Identity, theories of Representation, Theories of Race” in McCarthy, C. and Crichlow, W. (eds) Race, Identity and Representation in Education. pp. xiii-xxix. New York, NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London, UK: Continuum.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKay, S.L. and Wong, C. (1996) “Multiple Discourses, Multiple Identities: Investment and Agency in Second Language Learning Among Chinese Adolescent Immigrant Students” Harvard Educational Review, v66 n3 p577-608 Fall 1996. Retrieved from: https://www.eric.ed.gov.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorton Peirce, B. (1995, Spring). Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning. Retrieved from: TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 9-31. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3587803spa
dc.relation.referencesNorton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and educational Change. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, A. (1997). Trabajo Social y Procesos Familiares. Buenos Aires, BsAs: Lumen.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 9, No 1. Pp. 41-51. Retrieved from Jstor database.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchieffelin, B. and Ochs, E. (1986). Language Socialization Across Cultures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeutsch –Dwyer, (2001). (Re) “Constructing Masculinity in a New Linguistic Reality.” In Aneta Pavlenko et al. (eds.) Multilingualism, Second Language Acquisition and Gender. pp. 175-198. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.spa
dc.relation.referencesTudor, I. (2001). The Dynamics of the Language Classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. New York, NY: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalkerdine, V. (1998). Counting Girls Out: Girls and Mathematics. London, UK: Falmer Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeedon, C. (1987). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillet, J. (Autumn, 1995). Becoming First Graders in an L2: An Ethnographic Study of L2 Socialization. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 29, No. 3, Qualitative Research in ESOL, pp. 473-503. Retrieved from: www.Jstor.org. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3588072spa
dc.relation.referencesZuluaga Corrales, C. T., López Pinzón, M. M. and Quintero Corzo, J. (2009). Integrating the Coffee Culture with The Teaching of English. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 27-42.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-Nocomercial-SinDerivar 4.0 International*
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEducaciónspa
dc.subjectInvestigacionesspa
dc.subjectEnseñanza del inglésspa
dc.subjectEnseñanza superiorspa
dc.subjectColombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordsEducationeng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsTeaching Englisheng
dc.subject.keywordsHigher educationeng
dc.subject.keywordsColombiaeng
dc.titleAnálisis del discurso aplicado a la enseñanza del inglés en contextos colombianos: teoría y métodosspa
dc.title.englishDiscourse Analysis Applied to English Language Teaching in Colombian Contexts: Theory anda Methodseng
dc.title.translatedDiscourse Analysis Applied to English Language Teaching in Colombian Contexts: Theory anda Methodseng
dc.typebook
dc.type.coarhttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33
dc.type.coarversionhttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/book
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localLibro completospa

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
9789587390612.pdf
Tamaño:
2.33 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: