Disagreement in Logic
| dc.creator | Vásquez Dávila, Omar Hildebrando | |
| dc.date | 2019-10-04 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-22T21:27:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22T21:27:20Z | |
| dc.description | In this brief paper the Quine´s famous thesis, according to which a change of logic implies a change in the meaning that logical expressions convey, is analyzed and criticized. First, as a result of the analysis, I show that this thesis is important to understand what it means to put Classical First Order Logic in question. Secondly, as a result of some remarks I make against the quinean thesis, I hold that it is possible to find a genuine disagreement between a classical logician and a deviant logician. In particular, I propose that in defining logical expressions we have to considerer the relationship between logical laws and some general uses of those expressions. Besides, as a strategy to form a common basis to allow the disagreement between a classical logician and a deviant logician I appeal to some ways of weakening logical laws | en-US |
| dc.description | En este breve trabajo es analizada y criticada la famosa tesis de Quine según la cual un cambio de lógica implica un cambio del significado de las conectivas lógicas. Primero, como resultado del análisis, muestro que dicha tesis es importante para entender qué significa cuestionar la Lógica Clásica de Primer Orden. En segundo lugar, como resultado de algunas críticas que dirijo a la tesis quineana, sostengo que es posible un desacuerdo genuino entre un lógico clásico y un lógico divergente. En particular, propongo que al definir las expresiones lógicas tenemos que considerar la relación entre leyes lógicas y algunos usos que hacemos de dichas expresiones. Además, como una estrategia para formar un significado básico común de las conectivas que permita el desacuerdo entre un lógico clásico y uno divergente, apelo a algunas maneras de debilitar las leyes lógicas clásicas. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format | text/html | |
| dc.format | application/xml | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/2452 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.18270/rcfc.v19i38.2452 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/17009 | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad El Bosque | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/2452/2206 | |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/2452/2912 | |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/2452/2819 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beall, J. C. “Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality and Gluts”. Noûs, 49 (2015): 410-423. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beall, J. C. and Greg Restall. Logical Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brun, G. “Logical expressivism, logical theory and the critique of inferences”. Synthese, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1662-y (2018): 1-17. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Haack, Susan. Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hjortland, O. T. “Logical Pluralism, Meaning-Variance, and Verbal Disputes”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91:2 (2013): 355-373. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Priest, G. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic, second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Quine, W. V. O. Philosophy of Logic, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Shapiro, S. Varieties of logic. Oxford University Press, USA, 2014. | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia | es-ES |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 19 No. 38 (2019): Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 19 Núm. 38 (2019): Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2463-1159 | |
| dc.source | 0124-4620 | |
| dc.source | 10.18270/rcfc.v19i38 | |
| dc.subject | leyes lógicas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Lógica clásica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Lógica paraconsistente | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Debilitamiento | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Usos | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Lógica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | logical laws | en-US |
| dc.subject | classical logic | en-US |
| dc.subject | Paraconsistent logic | en-US |
| dc.subject | weakening | en-US |
| dc.subject | uses | en-US |
| dc.title | Disagreement in Logic | en-US |
| dc.title | Desacuerdo en lógica | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |