NUEVA INDUCCIÓN Y LEBENSWELT
| dc.creator | Aguirre García, Juan Carlos | |
| dc.date | 2016-04-27 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-22T21:26:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22T21:26:32Z | |
| dc.description | Stanford ofrece una versión completa de lo que denominó el problema de las alternativasno concebidas o nueva inducción. Este se ha convertido en un gran desafío para elrealismo científico. Psillos, en respuesta a Stanford, homologa la nueva inducción con losproblemas que surgen de la formulación husserliana de la Lebenswelt. El propósito de esteartículo es cuestionar la lectura de Psillos a partir de las dificultades de tratar la nuevainducción a la luz de la Lebenswelt y la posibilidad de leer la Lebenswelt desde el realismocientífico, antes que desde el antirrealismo. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1634 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.18270/rcfc.v13i27.1634 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/16708 | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad El Bosque | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1634/1228 | |
| dc.relation | 10.18270/rcfc.v13i27.1634.g1228 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Aguirre, J. “Husserl y la justificación indirecta”. Anuario Colombiano de Fenomenología | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/4 (2010): 313-31. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Aguirre, J. “Husserl y la filosofía de la ciencia: Desafíos y posibilidades”. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cuadernos de Epistemología 5. Eds. L. Jaramillo y J. Aguirre. Popayán: | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Universidad del Cauca, 2011. 103-29. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, “Husserl y el antirrealismo (¿o realismo?) científico”. Kriterion 129 (2014): | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/en prensa. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Aguirre, J. y L. Jaramillo. “La ciencia y el sentido común: por la enseñanza | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/de un sentido común crítico”. Educación y Educadores 13.3 (2010): 477-94. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Belousek, D. W. “Husserl on Scientific Method and Conceptual Change: a | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Realist Appraisal”. Synthese 115 (1998): 71-98. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bunge, M. Chasing Reality: Strive over Realism. Toronto: University of Toronto | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Press, 2006. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Chakravartty, A. “What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt You: Realism and the | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Unconceived”. Philosophical Studies 137 (2008): 149-58. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Devitt, M. Realism and Truth. 2 ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, “Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism?” Journal | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/for General Philosophy of Science 42.2 (2011): 285-93. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dodd, J. Crisis and Reflection: An Essay on Husserl’s Crisis of the European | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Føllesdal, D. “The Lebenswelt in Husserl”. Science and the Life-world: Essays | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/on Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences. Eds. D. Hyder y H.-J. Rheinberger. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010. 27-45 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gutting, G. “Husserl and Scientific Realism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Research 39.1 (1978): 42-56. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Husserl, E. Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1962. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Investigaciones lógicas I. Madrid: Altaya, 1995. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Phantasy, Image, Consciousness, and Memory (1898-1925). Dordrecht: | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Springer, 2005. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, La tierra no se mueve. Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 2006. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental. Buenos | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Aires: Prometeo, 2008. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge. Lectures 1906/1907. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Laudan, L. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”. Philosophy of Science 40.1 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/: 19-49. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Milone, R. “Lebenswelt husserliana y concepción semántica de las teorías”. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ideas y Valores 56.135 (2007): 85-94. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mormann, T. “Husserl’s Philosophy of Science and the Semantic Approach”. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Philosophy of Science 58.1 (1991): 61-83. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Poincaré, H. Science and Hypothesis. Nueva York: Dover, 1905. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Psillos, S. “Scientific Realism and the ‘Pessimistic Induction’ ”. Philosophy of | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Science 63 (1996): S306-S314. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. Londres: Routledge, 1999. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Philosophy of Science A – Z. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Londres: Palgrave McMillan, 2009. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, “Is the History of Science the Wasteland of False Theories?” Adapting | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom. Eds. P. V. Kokotas, K. S. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Malamitsa y A. A. Rizaki. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2011. 17-36. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, “Scientific Realism with Humean Face”. Continuum Companion to The | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Philosophy of Science. Eds. S. French y J. Saatsi. Londres: Continuum, 2011. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/75-95. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Putnam, H. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/University Press, 1975. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, The Many Faces of Realism. Illinois: Open Court, 1995. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rouse, J. “Husserlian Phenomenology and Scientific Realism”. Philosophy of | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Science 54 (1987): 222-32. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Saatsi, J.; Psillos, S.; Grønfeldt W; Rasmus & Stanford, K. “Grasping at | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Realists Straws”. Metascience 18 (2009): 355-390. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sankey, H. “Ciencia, sentido común y realidad”. Discusiones Filosóficas 16 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/: 41-58. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sklar, L. Theory and Truth: Philosophical Critic within Foundational Science. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Soffer, G. “Phenomenology and Scientific Realism: Husserl’s Critique of | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Galileo”. Review of Metaphysics 44 (1990): 67-94. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stanford, K. “An Antirealist Explanation of the Success of Science”. Philosophy | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/of Science 67.2 (2000): 266-84. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/We Take Serioustly?” Philosophy of Science 68 (2001): S1-S12. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, Exceeding our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, “Underdetermination of Scientific Theory”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Philosophy (2009). En línea. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/ | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/entries/scientific-underdetermination> | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ströker, E. “Science and Lifeworld: A Problem of Cultural Change”. Human | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Studies 20 (1997): 303-14. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, The Husserlian Foundations of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Publishers, 1997. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/—, The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Walton, R. J. “Edmund Husserl, Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916-1937). | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rochus Sowa (ed.) (Series Husserliana, vol. XXXIX)”. Husserl Studies 26 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/: 205-224. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wiltsche, H. “What is Wrong with Husserl’s Scientific Anti-Realism?” Inquiry | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/2 (2012): 105-30. | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 13 No. 27 (2013) | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 13 Núm. 27 (2013) | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2463-1159 | |
| dc.source | 0124-4620 | |
| dc.title | NUEVA INDUCCIÓN Y LEBENSWELT | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |