CLEFT-Q: detecting differences in outcomes among 2434 patients with varying cleft types

Miniatura

Archivos

Wong Riff, Karen W. Y..pdf (351.41 KB)

Fecha

2019

Autores

Título de la revista

Publicado en

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 0032-1052, Vol 144, Num 1, 2019, pag 78e-88e

Publicado por

American Society of Plastic Surgeons

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2339

URL de la fuente

https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006534-201907000-00038

ISSN de la revista

Título del volumen

Resumen

Descripción

Abstract

Background: Measuring the patient perspective is important in evaluating outcomes of cleft care. Understanding how treatment outcomes vary depending on cleft type may allow for better planning of treatments, setting of expectations, and more accurate benchmarking efforts. The CLEFT-Q is a patientreported outcome measure for patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Methods: The 12 CLEFT-Q scales measuring appearance (i.e., face, nose, nostrils, lips, cleft lip scar, teeth, and jaws), function (i.e., speech), and health-related quality of life (i.e., psychological, school, social, and speech-related distress) were field tested in a cross-sectional study in 30 centers in 12 countries. Patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate aged 8 to 29 years were recruited from clinical settings. Differences in CLEFT-Q scores by cleft subtypes were evaluated usingone-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H tests, with Tukey or Dunn procedure with Bonferroni corrections post hoc analyses, respectively. Scores are presented using radar charts to visualize all outcomes simultaneously. Results: The field test included 2434 patients. Scores on all CLEFT-Q scales varied significantly with cleft subtype. Patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and/or palate scored lower on all appearance scales compared with patients with cleft palate or unilateral incomplete cleft lip. Scores on the speech function and speech-related distress scales decreased with each progressive group in the Veau classification. Patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate scored lowest on the social, school, and psychological scales. Conclusions: Patient-reported outcomes measured with the CLEFT-Q vary significantly with cleft type. Visualizing multiple outcomes simultaneously with radar charts allows for an understanding of a patient’s overall status in a single graph.

Palabras clave

Keywords

Temáticas

Fisura del paladar
Anomalías maxilomandibulares
Estudio de evaluación

Citación

Colecciones

Artículos